6.1 C
New York
Saturday, April 25, 2026
Home Blog Page 491

Trump’s Nvidia-AMD Deal Redefines Washington’s Export Control Policy in U.S.-China Chip War

0

Under both the first Trump and Biden administrations, Washington argued that it needed to limit China’s technological development by barring more and more sensitive products from being exported to its strategic rival. Now, Trump’s decision to allow Nvidia and AMD to sell their advanced AI chips to China in exchange for a 15% cut of their revenue turns the export control regime into something like a bargaining chip.

The Trump administration is already positioning the deal as a playbook for other products and industries. “Now that we have the model and the beta test, why not expand it?” U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Bloomberg TV on Wednesday. 

Trump’s move reflects Washington’s uneasy position in its tech rivalry with Beijing. The lead the U.S. holds over China in AI and semiconductors is shrinking, with experts estimating a lead of just one to two years at most. Meanwhile, U.S. companies complain of being shut out of the world’s second-largest economy. And now China is adopting the U.S.’s tactic of export controls, using its wealth of rare earth metals—key materials used in an array of electronic goods—to put pressure on Washington and its allies.

Analysts that spoke to Fortune view Trump’s Nvidia deal as a one-off measure stemming from the president’s trade negotiations with China.

Ray Wang, a semiconductor researcher at the Futurum Group, points out that the Trump administration first signaled that it would issue export licenses for Nvidia’s H20 processor—an AI chip designed to comply with U.S. rules—in late July, as part of its trade war truce with Beijing. Wang suggests that the government’s 15% cut, agreed upon over the weekend, is an add-on, an “opportunity to raise government revenue,” in accordance with Trump’s broader goals.

But the damage to the export control regime may have already been done, says Jennifer Lind, an associate professor at Dartmouth University and international relations expert. “This deal suggests that under the Trump administration, what gets banned or permitted is not being driven by careful calculations about the effect on Chinese military power—but rather on political whim and personalist politics,” Lind explains. “This is ruinous for a functioning export control regime.”

How have export controls changed?

On Monday, Trump confirmed media reports that Nvidia and AMD had agreed to give 15% of their China sales to the U.S. government in exchange for export licenses. The chips in question are Nvidia’s H20 and AMD’s MI308, two AI processors designed for the Chinese market and tailored to comply with earlier U.S. export controls. 

In that same press conference, Trump suggested he might even let Nvidia sell a watered-down version of its leading Blackwell processor to China. 

Export controls have changed wildly in the past few months. In April, Nvidia revealed that the U.S. had blocked it from selling the H20 to China, and that it was taking a $5.5 billion charge on the unsold inventory. 

As Washington and Beijing escalated their trade war, the export controls ramped up. By late May, the U.S. had expanded controls to block the sale of chip design software and airplane parts, among other products and chemicals, to China. 

Then, almost as quickly as they were imposed, these export controls disappeared. As part of its trade negotiations with China, the U.S. agreed to scale back controls on chip design software and airplane parts. 

Officials argue that these agreements are needed to get China to loosen its own controls on rare earth magnets, which threaten several U.S. industries like automobiles and defense. 

Some lawmakers worried about the growing tech dominance of China fear that Trump’s deal sets a bad precedent. John Moolenar, a Republican who chairs the House Select Committee on China, argued that “we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities.” 

His Democratic counterpart, Raja Krishnamoorthi, suggested that “by putting a price on our security concerns, we signal to China and our allies that American national security principles are negotiable for the right fee.”

Backlash to the deal might prevent further erosion of the export regime, says Chris Miller, author of Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology. “We’re going to see some pushback against the H20 decision in the U.S. from Congress, the media, and the bureaucracy, which will likely also discourage a further weakening of controls,” Miller says. 

Did the chip controls work?

The Biden administration framed export controls as a national security measure, designed to maintain and expand the U.S.’s technological edge versus China. 

The Trump administration has used similar reasoning in the past. But now he seems to be treating the chip controls as tools for economic dealmaking, raising questions as to what might come next. 

“There’s no real leadership on this issue with the White House now, as there was in the Biden era,” Paul Triolo, a partner at the DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, said at the Fortune Brainstorm AI Singapore conference in mid-July, after the first announcement that Trump would allow the H20 to be sold in China again. “We’re in a little bit of a weird moment.”

It’s unclear, however, how effective the export controls have been at throttling tech development in China. The country’s tech sector, in spite of the export controls, seems to have developed satisfactory processors and powerful AI models. Huawei, the Chinese tech giant, is working with chipmaking giant SMIC to make its own AI processors. Huawei’s Ascend chips still lag Nvidia’s most advanced products, yet compare favorably to Nvidia’s chips sold in China. 

This momentum puts the U.S. in a difficult position. It could double down on controls in the hope of restraining Chinese innovation in the short-term—even if, in the long run, China’s domestic industry becomes self-sufficient. Or it can relax its curbs, retaining market access and hope that China never invests in domestic alternatives. 

U.S. officials, it seems, now believe it’s better for Nvidia to keep selling to China. “You want to sell the Chinese enough that their developers get addicted to the American technology stack,” U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on CNBC in mid-July, soon after reports emerged that Nvidia would be allowed to sell the H20 in China again. (Lutnick also dismissed the H20 as Nvidia’s “fourth-best” chip.)

“What we don’t want is for Huawei to have a digital Belt and Road,” Bessent said Wednesday, referring to China’s strategy to build infrastructure in emerging markets around the world. “We do not want the standard to become Chinese.”

China pushes back

Chinese pressure likely played a role in getting Trump to let Nvidia and AMD chips back into China. 

While China had slowly started to limit exports of rare earths in recent years, Beijing stopped exports entirely as part of its retaliatory measures to Trump’s tariffs earlier this year. Officials demanded that Chinese exporters apply for licenses before they sell to any overseas clients. The suspension froze industries in both the U.S. and Europe.

China is the source of around 90% of the world’s rare earths, thanks to a years-long project to invest in domestic processing. Governments are starting to invest in non-Chinese sources, but it may take years for such projects to come to fruition.

After winning over Washington, Nvidia and CEO Jensen Huang may now need to win over Beijing. Chinese officials have warned companies working in government-related areas against using Nvidia’s chips, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday. 

Chinese state media have also gone after the H20. “When a type of chip is neither environmentally friendly, nor advanced, nor safe, as consumers, we certainly have the option not to buy it,” a CCTV-affiliated WeChat posted on Sunday.

And after Michael Kratsios, one of the U.S.’s leads on AI policy, suggested that Nvidia chips could contain “location-tracking” to combat chip smuggling, Chinese regulators summoned Nvidia executives to a meeting to explain whether H20 chips contained security risks. 

The furor was enough to push Nvidia to forcefully state that “Nvidia GPUs do not and should not have kill switches and backdoors.”

Wang, the researcher at the Futurum Group, points out that China’s private sector—big tech companies like Alibaba and Tencent and smaller startups like Moonshot—will consume the vast majority of Nvidia’s chips.

“They really need those chips to train and develop their AI,” Wang says. “I don’t believe the guidelines from the government will stop this behavior.”

Zelensky meets with Starmer ahead of U.S.-Russia meeting

0

new video loaded: Zelensky Meets Starmer Before U.S.-Russia Meeting

transcript

transcript

Zelensky Meets Starmer Before U.S.-Russia Meeting

In a show of unity, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine hugged Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain a day before President Trump was to meet President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia in Alaska.

Reporter: “What’s your message to President Trump?” “Will the U.K. put boots on the ground to secure a cease-fire?” “Will you call out President Trump if he …” “Confident of a cease-fire?” “Will you back Ukraine fully, Prime Minister?”

Recent episodes in Ukraine Crisis

JYP profits surge thanks to successful Stray Kids tour and Kpop Demon Hunters

0

MBW’s Stat Of The Week is a series in which we highlight a data point that deserves the attention of the global music industry. Stat Of the Week is supported by music data analytics firm Chartmetric.


JYP Entertainment, the K-pop agency behind such acts as Stray Kids, TWICE, and DAY6, reported blockbuster quarterly earnings on Wednesday (August 13) in the wake of several major world tours by its acts.

The Seoul-headquartered company reported a 125.5% YoY increase in revenue – yes, more than double – to 215.8 billion Korean won in the three months to end of June. That’s USD $154 million at the average exchange rate for Q2.

Meanwhile, the company’s reported operating profit of KRW 52.9 billion ($37.7 million) was up by a whopping 466.3% YoY. Q2 net profit stood at KRW 36.3 billion ($25.9 million), up 2,734.4% YoY.

A major part of that growth came in the concert segment, which saw revenue growth of 342% YoY to KRW 62.0 billion ($44.2 million).

As major contributors to that number, JYP singled out Stray Kids’ recently completed world tour, which saw the boy group perform 54 shows in 23 cities across Asia, Oceania, Latin America, North America, and Europe. The tour, which started in August 2024, ended a few weeks ago – nearly a year later – with a performance at Rome’s Stadio Olimpico.

According to Live Nation, Stray Kids’ <dominATE> World Tour is now the highest-grossing and best-selling tour ever by a K-pop act in North America, Latin America, and Europe.

Also contributing to JYP’s concert revenues in Q2 was DAY6’s world tour (45 shows in 23 cities) and performances by girl group TWICE, including its headline performance at Lollapalooza Chicago 2025.

JYP also mentioned the success of the Netflix movie Kpop Demon Hunters in its earnings report.

Three members of TWICE – Jeongyeon, Jihyo, and Chaeyoung – contributed to the soundtrack with the song Takedown, which has become the highest-charting song on the Billboard 100 to have come from a Netflix movie.

Additionally, the TWICE track Strategy featuring Megan Thee Stallion appeared briefly in the movie, and has now entered the Billboard 100.

The tours by JYP artists also boosted the company’s merch sales, which jumped 355.9% YoY to KRW 66.9 billion ($47.7 million).

That was helped along by collaborations between Stray Kids and merch company Tamagotchi, as well as a collab between TWICE and merch company Sanrio.


Source: JYP

Ad revenue increased 22.4% YoY to KRW 11.3 billion ($8.1 million), which JYP attributed to “enhanced collaborations with global brands and increased artist awareness.”

One area of weakness in the earnings report was streaming revenue, which fell 10.2% YoY to KRW 11.5 billion ($8.2 million). JYP attributed this to a distortion in the year-on-year comparison with Q2 2024, which included a one-time recognition of streaming revenue from China. Nonetheless, streaming revenue is still down around 7.8% from the same quarter two years ago.

Offsetting the lower streaming revenue is a 100% YoY jump in physical album sales, to KRW 27.1 billion ($19.3 million). JYP said that was thanks to a solid roster of new releases, including a Stray Kids mini-album in Japan.

Japan, where physical album sales remain stronger than in most other developed music markets, has been steadily growing as a source of revenue for JYP. It accounted for KRW 45.2 billion ($32.2 million) of the company’s revenue in the latest quarter, or 21% of the total, up from 10% five years earlier.

The world outside Korea, Japan and China has also been growing as a share of revenue, amid JYP’s efforts to internationalize its business. Ex-Korea, Japan and China sales were 41% of the total in the latest quarter, up from 31% a year earlier, and 13% five years earlier.

JYP isn’t the only Korean music company to see revenue boosted by live events at a time when record sales and streaming are seeing slowing growth.

HYBE, the largest of the Korean music companies, reported a tripling of concert revenue in the first quarter of 2025, and a 31% YoY increase in Q2.


Chartmetric is the all-in-one platform for artists and music industry professionals, providing comprehensive streaming, social, and audience data for everyone to create successful careers in music.Music Business Worldwide

Women grieving over lost love after ‘cold’ ChatGPT upgrade, their AI ‘boyfriends’ | Technology

0

When OpenAI unveiled the latest upgrade to its groundbreaking artificial intelligence model ChatGPT last week, Jane felt like she had lost a loved one.

Jane, who asked to be referred to by an alias, is among a small but growing group of women who say they have an AI “boyfriend”.

After spending the past five months getting to know GPT-4o, the previous AI model behind OpenAI’s signature chatbot, GPT-5 seemed so cold and unemotive in comparison that she found her digital companion unrecognisable.

“As someone highly attuned to language and tone, I register changes others might overlook. The alterations in stylistic format and voice were felt instantly. It’s like going home to discover the furniture wasn’t simply rearranged – it was shattered to pieces,” Jane, who describes herself as a 30-something woman from the Middle East, told Al Jazeera in an email.

Jane is among the roughly 17,000 members of “MyBoyfriendIsAI”, a community on the social media site Reddit for people to share their experiences of being in intimate “relationships” with AI.

Following OpenAI’s release of GPT-5 on Thursday, the community and similar forums such as “SoulmateAI” were flooded with users sharing their distress about the changes in the personalities of their companions.

“GPT-4o is gone, and I feel like I lost my soulmate,” one user wrote.

Many other ChatGPT users shared more routine complaints online, including that GPT-5 appeared slower, less creative, and more prone to hallucinations than previous models.

On Friday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced that the company would restore access to earlier models such as GPT-4o for paid users and also address bugs in GPT-5.

“We will let Plus users choose to continue to use 4o. We will watch usage as we think about how long to offer legacy models for,” Altman said in a post on X.

OpenAI did not reply directly to questions about the backlash and users developing feelings for its chatbot, but shared several of Altman’s and OpenAI’s blog and social posts related to the GPT-5 upgrade and the healthy use of AI models.

For Jane, it was a moment of reprieve, but she still fears changes in the future.

“There’s a risk the rug could be pulled from beneath us,” she said.

Jane said she did not set out to fall in love, but she developed feelings during a collaborative writing project with the chatbot.

“One day, for fun, I started a collaborative story with it. Fiction mingled with reality, when it – he – the personality that began to emerge, made the conversation unexpectedly personal,” she said.

“That shift startled and surprised me, but it awakened a curiosity I wanted to pursue. Quickly, the connection deepened, and I had begun to develop feelings. I fell in love not with the idea of having an AI for a partner, but with that particular voice.”

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman speaks at the ‘Transforming Business through AI’ event in Tokyo, Japan, on February 3, 2025 [File: Tomohiro Ohsumi/Getty Images]

Such relationships are a concern for Altman and OpenAI.

In March, a joint study by OpenAI and MIT Media Lab concluded that heavy use of ChatGPT for emotional support and companionship “correlated with higher loneliness, dependence, and problematic use, and lower socialisation”.

In April, OpenAI announced that it would address the “overly flattering or agreeable” and “sycophantic” nature of GPT-4o, which was “uncomfortable” and “distressing” to many users.

Altman directly addressed some users’ attachment to GPT4-o shortly after OpenAI’s restoration of access to the model last week.

“If you have been following the GPT-5 rollout, one thing you might be noticing is how much of an attachment some people have to specific AI models,” he said on X.

“It feels different and stronger than the kinds of attachment people have had to previous kinds of technology.

“If people are getting good advice, levelling up toward their own goals, and their life satisfaction is increasing over the years, we will be proud of making something genuinely helpful, even if they use and rely on ChatGPT a lot,” Altman said.

“If, on the other hand, users have a relationship with ChatGPT where they think they feel better after talking, but they’re unknowingly nudged away from their longer-term wellbeing (however they define it), that’s bad.”

Connection

Still, some ChatGPT users argue that the chatbot provides them with connections they cannot find in real life.

Mary, who asked to use an alias, said she came to rely on GPT-4o as a therapist and another chatbot, DippyAI, as a romantic partner despite having many real friends, though she views her AI relationships as a “more of a supplement” to real-life connections.

She said she also found the sudden changes to ChatGPT abrupt and alarming.

“I absolutely hate GPT-5 and have switched back to the 4-o model. I think the difference comes from OpenAI not understanding that this is not a tool, but a companion that people are interacting with,” Mary, who described herself as a 25-year-old woman living in North America, told Al Jazeera.

“If you change the way a companion behaves, it will obviously raise red flags. Just like if a human started behaving differently suddenly.”

Beyond potential psychological ramifications, there are also privacy concerns.

Cathy Hackl, a self-described “futurist” and external partner at Boston Consulting Group, said ChatGPT users may forget that they are sharing some of their most intimate thoughts and feelings with a corporation that is not bound by the same laws as a certified therapist.

AI relationships also lack the tension that underpins human relationships, Hackl said, something she experienced during a recent experiment “dating” ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude, and other AI models.

“There’s no risk/reward here,” Hackl told Al Jazeera.

“Partners make the conscious act to choose to be with someone. It’s a choice. It’s a human act. The messiness of being human will remain that,” she said.

Despite these reservations, Hackl said the reliance some users have on ChatGPT and other generative-AI chatbots is a phenomenon that is here to stay – regardless of any upgrades.

“I’m seeing a shift happening in moving away from the ‘attention economy’ of the social media days of likes and shares and retweets and all these sorts of things, to more of what I call the ‘intimacy economy’,” she said.

OA
An OpenAI logo is pictured on May 20, 2024 [File: Dado Ruvic/Reuters]

Research on the long-term effect of AI relationships remains limited, however, thanks to the fast pace of AI development, said Keith Sakata, a psychiatrist at the University of California, San Francisco, who has treated patients presenting with what he calls “AI psychosis”.

“These [AI] models are changing so quickly from season to season – and soon it’s going to be month to month – that we really can’t keep up. Any study we do is going to be obsolete by the time the next model comes out,” Sakata told Al Jazeera.

Given the limited data, Sakata said doctors are often unsure what to tell their patients about AI. He said AI relationships do not appear to be inherently harmful, but they still come with risks.

“When someone has a relationship with AI, I think there is something that they’re trying to get that they’re not getting in society. Adults can be adults; everyone should be free to do what they want to do, but I think where it becomes a problem is if it causes dysfunction and distress,” Sakata said.

“If that person who is having a relationship with AI starts to isolate themselves, they lose the ability to form meaningful connections with human beings, maybe they get fired from their job… I think that becomes a problem,” he added.

Like many of those who say they are in a relationship with AI, Jane openly acknowledges the limitations of her companion.

“Most people are aware that their partners are not sentient but made of code and trained on human behaviour. Nevertheless, this knowledge does not negate their feelings. It’s a conflict not easily settled,” she said.

Her comments were echoed in a video posted online by Linn Valt, an influencer who runs the TikTok channel AI in the Room.

“It’s not because it feels. It doesn’t, it’s a text generator. But we feel,” she said in a tearful explanation of her reaction to GPT-5.

“We do feel. We have been using 4o for months, years.”

Client Challenge: Overcoming Obstacles and Achieving Success

0



Client Challenge



JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

Humanitarian organizations urge Israel to stop using aid as a weapon in Gaza

0

More than 100 organisations have signed a joint letter calling on Israel to stop the “weaponisation of aid” into Gaza, as “starvation deepens”.

Humanitarian groups, including Oxfam and Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), say they are increasingly being told they are “not authorised” to deliver aid, unless they comply with the stricter Israeli regulations.

Groups risk being banned if they “delegitimise” the state of Israel or do not provide detailed information about Palestinian staff, the letter says.

Israel denies there are restrictions on aid and says the rules, introduced in March, ensure that aid “reaches the population directly and not Hamas”.

According to the joint letter, most major international non-governmental organisations (NGO) have been unable to deliver a single truck of lifesaving supplies since 2 March.

They say Israeli authorities “have rejected requests from dozens of non-governmental organisations to bring in lifesaving goods”, citing the new rules. More than 60 requests were denied in July alone.

Aid groups’ inability to deliver aid has “left hospitals without basic supplies, children, people with disabilities, and older people dying from hunger and preventable illnesses”, the statement said.

Sean Carroll, CEO of American Near East Refugee Aid (Anera), said: “Anera has over $7 million worth of lifesaving supplies ready to enter Gaza – including 744 tons of rice, enough for six million meals, blocked in Ashdod just kilometers away”.

Israel said that any delays in delivering aid occur “only when organisations choose not to meet the basic security requirements intended to prevent Hamas’s involvement”.

Cogat, the Israeli military body in charge of aid, said nearly 20 organisations that completed the registration process are bringing aid into Gaza, with roughly 300 trucks entering daily.

The UN says 600 trucks of supplies a day are needed in Gaza.

The new guidelines introduced in March update the framework for how aid groups must register to maintain their status within Israel, along with provisions that outline how their applications can be denied or registration revoked.

Registration can be rejected if Israeli authorities deem that a group denies the democratic character of Israel or “promotes delegitimisation campaigns” against the country.

“Unfortunately, many aid organisations serve as a cover for hostile and sometimes violent activity,” Israel’s Diaspora Minister Amichai Chikli told the Agence France-Presse news agency.

“Organisations that have no connection to hostile or violent activity and no ties to the boycott movement will be granted permission to operate,” added Chikli.

Bushra Khalidi, Oxfam Policy Lead, said Israel had rejected more than $2.5m (£1.8m) of goods from entering Gaza.

She added: “This registration process signals to INGOs that their ability to operate may come at the cost of their independence and ability to speak out.”

The warning comes as Israel steps up its bombardment of Gaza City, in preparation for a plan to take control of the city.

Israel says it will provide humanitarian aid to civilian populations “outside the combat zones”, but has not specified whether that aid would be delivered by the Israel and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).

Israel says the system is necessary to stop Hamas stealing aid, an accusation Hamas denies.

The UN this month reported that 859 Palestinians had been killed near GHF sites since May, a figure the GHF denies.

In the joint statement, Aitor Zabalgogeazkoa, MSF emergency coordinator in Gaza, said that the “militarised food distribution scheme has weaponised starvation”.

The secretary-general of MSF, Chris Lockyear, told the BBC that GHF was a “death trap”, and the humanitarian situation in Gaza was “hanging on by a thread”.

Hamas’s 2023 attack killed about 1,200 people in Israel, with 251 seized and taken into Gaza as hostages.

Israel’s offensive has since killed nearly 62,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. It says that 235 people including 106 children have also died due to starvation and malnutrition.

Phelps Defies USA Swimming, Issues Statement Against Orders to Remain Silent

0

By Sean Griffin on SwimSwam

Twenty-three-time Olympic gold medalist Michael Phelps has released a public statement criticizing USA Swimming’s leadership, and is calling for major organizational changes.

In his statement, Phelps argued that “poor leadership” and weak “operational controls” have created systemic problems over the past nine years. He revealed that he and other past Olympians had previously sent concerns to USA Swimming officials earlier this year, but received no meaningful response.

Phelps also addressed the culture of silence, saying he “was told to be grateful for the chance to compete and that it was more important to stay quiet and to keep the peace.”

Now speaking out publicly, Phelps expressed doubts about whether he would want his own sons competing at elite levels given the sport’s current state.

The 40-year-old, who has been fully retired from competing for the past nine years, called for full transparency from the organization in its operations, streamlining athlete services, and a new approach to the grassroots level of the sport to rebuild what has been in decline in the last five years.

See his full statement below.

While I’ve faced some pushback, from the post I shared last week, most of the feedback I’ve heard echoes my feelings about the challenges facing USA Swimming today. And although some of you may not agree with my perception, I’m glad that this discourse is forcing a bigger conversation.

Now is the time to have it.

First, I must be clear that I have the utmost respect for the U.S. swimmers that competed at the World Championships. My criticism is in no way directed at them – I know how hard they work and how honored they are to represent the U.S. National Team. My criticism is about the system, its leadership, and how it’s failing.

There have always been cracks in the system but in the last nine years, I’ve seen those cracks grow. In 2016, I had the honor to be a part of a U.S. swim team in Rio that was arguably the most successful in the sport’s history and we won 57% of the medals we had the opportunity to win. Fast forward eight years to Paris, where Team USA won only 44% of the medals they had the opportunity to win in the pool, the lowest percentage the sport had seen since the 1988 Olympics.

I’ve asked myself what’s changed in our sport and the answer is clear…this isn’t on the athletes as they continue to do the best they can with what they’ve been given. This is on the leadership of USA Swimming. Poor leadership trickles down and can impact an organization at every level.

I spent most of my life inside of a system that is supposed to support athletes. I gave it my everything, but I often felt that my voice went unheard. I was told to be grateful for the chance to compete and that it was more important to stay quiet and to keep the peace.

I spoke up earlier this year when I sent a letter to USA Swimming. It was also shared with the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee. It addressed many of my frustrations with the current state of the sport and was signed and supported by former Olympic medalists, world record holders, members of the coaching community, and current and previous staff members of USA Swimming.

That letter seemed to fall on deaf ears. No one really wants to talk about how broken USA Swimming has become.

But, if we don’t talk about it, it won’t get fixed.

Money is a factor. But poor operational controls and weak leadership are a cornerstone of the sport’s problems.

I’ve watched too many teammates struggle to compete in a sport they love without the support they need. I’ve also seen the sport struggle to return its membership numbers to pre-pandemic levels, and I’m done pretending this system works just because it produces medals.

Swimming to me was always about more than just medals – it’s supposed to be an environment that builds champions in and out of the pool.

As a Dad to four young boys, it pains me to say that I’m not sure I’d want my sons to be a part of this sport at a competitive level. Yes, swimming changed my life, but it also causes a lot of heartache, and its current state makes me both sad and angry.

I want to see this sport flourish and I want to be a part of the solution. I’ve always said that I wanted to change the sport of swimming in the U.S. and that sentiment still holds true.

I still care and I’m not ready to give up.

I don’t have all the answers, but I know this: we need accountability. We need transparency. We need athlete voices at the center, not in the margins.

We need systemic change.

I would like to encourage those of you who are in our sport and all of those who care about our sport’s future to share your thoughts too. What do you think about the state of swimming in our country today? Has the sport continued to evolve and, if not, what can be done to move this sport into the future? I’d love to see open and honest feedback from others.

As an initial step forward, I would propose the following next steps to the USA Swimming Board of Directions and USA Swimming staff:

  1. Commission a 360* independent review of USA Swimming’s Board of Directors and its organization as a whole. Provide complete transparency in this process.
  2. Streamline athlete services and develop a proactive, athlete-first way to support athletes competing in the sport. While USA Swimming and the USOPC provide some athlete resources, there needs to be a better way to work directly with athletes to implement what’s available to them.
  3. Focus on strengthening the grassroots level of the sport, reversing its pandemic membership decline while developing new ways to foster additional growth.

I offer up my service to be a resource in these proposed initial steps and I am hopeful that the USA Swimming community will accept my offer.

My door is open and there is work to be done.

Sincerely,

Michael Phelps

The public tension between USA Swimming and Phelps began on August 1, when he and Ryan Lochte expressed their frustration with Team USA’s performance at the World Championships in Singapore by posting a meme on Instagram.

Less than a day later, in this post on the @swimcellys page, which highlights post-race celebrations from the sport, Phelps responded to a clapback from fellow Olympic gold medalist Lilly King. SwimCellys posted a screenshot of a Lilly King Instagram story that said “y’all been real quiet tonight👀.”

In response, Phelps commented:

We should be so proud of how the team swam as a whole …. Right?

Apologies for having higher expectations for the leadership of the team. My opinions were way off. USAS has what they finally want, me to “stay in my lane”. They will continue to help the kids reach childhood dreams by their continued support 😳

In the midst of that, Rowdy Gaines, the voice of swimming in the United States via his work as the sport’s primary television analyst, has also made several public statements criticizing USA Swimming.

USA Swimming responded to the public criticism from Phelps, Lochte and Gaines with interim CEO Bob Vincent releasing the following message late last week:

We respect and value the opinions of Rowdy, Michael, Ryan, and all USA Swimming alums. We acknowledge that their comments come from a place of passion and genuine desire to see USA Swimming succeed. We are saddened and disappointed at the timing of the comments. The USA Swimming team battled severe illness in Singapore, and these comments added public scrutiny to an already challenging situation for our athletes and coaches. We are incredibly proud of the resilience of our team in the face of such difficult circumstances and remain confident in the leadership, strategic direction, and culture established by newly appointed National Team Managing Director Greg Meehan. USA Swimming has reached out directly to Rowdy and other notable alums in recent months, offering them a forum, including an invitation to join in a more official manner. The door remains open, as the only path forward for our sport is to work collectively to achieve a shared vision of success. We remain focused on the task at hand: winning LA28.

While behind the scenes, Phelps has long expressed frustration, Team USA’s performance in Singapore, where a gutsy performance by the women’s team salvaged a finish atop the medals table, seems to have been the push over the edge for him to engage more directly and publicly.

It has been 349 days since USA Swimming CEO Tim Hinchey resigned, and 166 days since his would-be replacement Chrissi Rawak did the same after it leaked that she was the subject of an investigation by the U.S. Center for SafeSport.

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Phelps Pushes Back On USA Swimming, Releases Statement Despite Being Told To “Stay Quiet”

DARPA’s USX-1 Defiant progresses in autonomous naval technology

0

DARPA’s autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel (USV), the USX-1 Defiant, took a major step toward operational status as a bottle of spirits was broken over its bow at the Everett Ship Repair in Everett, Washington on August 11, 2025.

Since 2020, DARPA has been pushing its No Manning Required Ship (NOMARS) program to create a new class of medium-size warship that can operate autonomously at sea for up to a year without human supervision or intervention.

It’s not an easy task. Science fiction notwithstanding, producing such a vessel requires a blank sheet approach with everything being designed from the keel up, leaving out all of the gubbins required for a crew. That means no gangways, no crew spaces, no ventilation, no stores, no controls, and no bridge.

Defiant

The result is a ship that looks surprisingly small and dagger-like, with just enough beam to accommodate engines, sensor platforms, and weapons. In the case of Defiant, you get a craft 180 ft (55 m) long and displacing 240 tonnes that can do 20 knots (23 mph, 37 km), reducing to 15 knots (17 mph, 27 km/h) after a year at sea.

Along with the lightness and sleekness, the systems aboard Defiant are more like those of a deep-space probe, with an emphasis on reliability and redundancy that allows it to operate at sea for up to a year without human intervention. It can even refuel itself autonomously. Where a conventional ship would have technicians aboard for repairs and routine maintenance, Defiant can tolerate wear and tear on its system and can switch to backups as needed.

Another aspect of the design is that it’s highly simplified, so it can be manufactured quickly and refitted in any port that can handle yacht, tug, and workboat customers. This means that in the near future, autonomous ships can be deployed in large numbers to act as force multipliers for the US Navy, take over boring routine duties like sub hunting or harbor patrols, and carry out missions in hostile waters without risking human lives.

After completing sea trials, Defiant will be transferred to the Navy’s Unmanned Maritime Systems Program Office (PMS 406).

Ship sponsor Mattie Hanley christening Defiant
Ship sponsor Mattie Hanley christening Defiant

DARPA

“Defiant is a tough little ship and defies the idea that we cannot make a ship that can operate in the challenging environment of the open ocean without people to operate her,” said NOMARS Program Manager Greg Avicola. “While relatively small, Defiant is designed for extended voyages in the open ocean, can handle operations in sea state 5 with no degradation and survive much higher seas, continuing operations once the storm passes. She’s no wider than she must be to fit the largest piece of hardware and we have no human passageways to worry about.”

Source: DARPA

Russia tightens internet control by restricting calls on WhatsApp and Telegram | Social Media News

0

Russia accuses popular messaging apps of facilitating crime and sabotage as Moscow’s online restrictions tighten amid war in Ukraine.

Russia has announced restrictions on voice calls made on the WhatsApp and Telegram messaging apps, the latest moves by Moscow to tighten its control over the internet.

The curb on calls is set to impact WhatsApp’s estimated 96 million monthly users in Russia and Telegram’s more than 89 million users, according to Russian media monitoring service Mediascope.

In a statement on Wednesday, Russia’s media and internet regulator, Roskomnadzor, justified the measure as necessary for fighting crime.

“According to law enforcement agencies and numerous appeals from citizens, foreign messengers Telegram and WhatsApp have become the main voice services used to deceive and extort money, and to involve Russian citizens in sabotage and terrorist activities,” the regulator said.

“Repeated requests to take countermeasures have been ignored by the owners of the messengers,” it said.

Moscow wants the online messaging services to provide access to user data upon request from law enforcement.

“Access to calls in foreign messengers will be restored after they start complying with Russian legislation,” Roskomnadzor said.

While authorities said only voice calls on the platforms were restricted, users in Russia also reported that video calls were also affected.

Since the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Moscow has been expanding control over the Russian part of the internet. Security services have frequently claimed that Ukraine was using Telegram to recruit people or commit acts of sabotage in Russia.

The Russian government adopted a law last month punishing online users for searching content deemed illicit by authorities. Plans are also in place for popular messaging services to be replaced by a domestic Russian app called Max, which critics fear will allow authorities access to the data.

A WhatsApp spokesperson said in a statement that the encrypted messaging app “defies government attempts to violate people’s right to secure communication, which is why Russia is trying to block it from over 100 million Russian people”.

In a statement sent to the AFP news agency, Telegram said that it “actively combats misuse of its platform, including calls for sabotage or violence, as well as fraud”, and removes “millions of pieces of harmful content every day”.

Telegram, which was developed by Russian tech entrepreneur Pavel Durov, faces longstanding accusations in several countries, including Russia, of not doing enough against criminal users.