25.9 C
New York
Wednesday, September 24, 2025
Home Blog Page 239

Syria’s Assad Regime Buries Victims in Mass Graves

0

The Najha cemetery is about five miles south of Damascus, the capital. It was established decades ago as a modest burial ground for people from Damascus and neighboring towns.

Shortly after the crackdown on the Syrian revolution in March 2011, President Bashar al-Assad’s government began using the cemetery to bury people it killed — many after being detained and tortured in prisons. The regime’s victims included anti-government protesters, activists, journalists; loyalists who fell out of favor; and members of rebel factions.

Satellite image from November 2011 by Maxar Technologies

The New York Times

While the existence of mass graves at Najha was previously known, our investigation reveals — for the first time — how the regime methodically developed the cemetery into one of the country’s largest mass grave sites.

Ms. al-Assad’s intelligence forces initially used empty, existing tombs that had not yet been taken for civilian burials, and then began dumping bodies into crudely dug pits. In more recent years, long trenches were filled with bodies, section by section.

The Times visited the Najha cemetery in February, two months after rebels overthrew Mr. al-Assad’s government.

Times journalists also analyzed satellite images from 2011 to 2024, reviewed photos and videos, and interviewed more than 20 people — including neighbors and former workers who were coerced into taking part in mass burials at Najha. Their accounts are consistent with each other and with what human rights groups have reported about Najha and other mass graves.

There is now a broad effort to identify and locate what are believed to be dozens of mass graves across the country. Najha was identified before the Assad government collapsed. At least 60 total locations have been reported to the White Helmets, a Syrian civil defense group that is leading an effort to excavate the graves.

The Assad government repeatedly denied killing people in detention, but the practice has been documented extensively. The exact number of bodies in mass graves — including Najha — cannot be known until excavations are completed. The Syrian Network for Human Rights estimates that more than 160,000 people who had been held in the regime’s detention centers are still missing.

Families of missing prisoners in Marjeh Square in Damascus looked at posters detailing information of their relatives.

Nicole Tung for The New York Times

“The mass graves that we’ve seen so far are bigger than anything we’ve encountered,” said Kathryne Bomberger of the International Commission on Missing Persons.

Bodies were initially piled into existing tombs

2011 – 12

The Assad government began burying the bodies of detainees at Najha in mid-2011, according to former grave workers.

The early mass burials used sites meant for people to bury their loved ones — rows of prebuilt tombs several feet below ground.

But former workers at Najha said that the regime’s officers buried multiple bodies in a single tomb. By using existing sites, the regime was able to keep the initial burials more covert.

Muhammad Afif Naifeh — at the time a clerk at the local mortuary office — said his manager first ordered him to accompany intelligence officials to Najha in mid-2011. There, he witnessed them opening an unmarked tomb and dumping six to seven bodies inside. The same operation was repeated at least twice more in 2011, he said, with the number of bodies increasing each time.

“There were so many decomposed bodies that they started slipping out of the truck,” said Mr. Naifeh, who eventually was forced to manage some aspects of the burial operations. Bodies that were not already decomposed had torture marks on them, he said.

Satellite images analyzed by The Times confirmed signs of mass grave activity — earth disturbances, large vehicles, widespread digging and excavation — in the area described by Mr. Naifeh.

The bodies came to Najha and other mass graves nearby from torture prisons like Sednaya and military hospitals like Tishreen and Harasta, according to reports by human right groups, including the Association of Detainees and Missing Persons of Sednaya Prison.

The Times spoke to a former driver for the Assad government, who said he transported truckloads of bodies from the Harasta military hospital to mass graves and witnessed burials at Najha.

“I thought about leaving, but that would have put my family at risk,” said the driver, who spoke to The Times on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retribution for speaking out. “Every truck driver had to follow orders,” he added, because the Assad government was “merciless.”

As killings soared, bodies were dumped into deep pits

2012

By 2012, a year into the civil war, deaths under the Assad regime began to soar. As more detainees were killed, the government ramped up its mass burial operation at Najha.

Rather than use existing tombs, intelligence forces coerced local municipal workers to dig pits, some nearly 10 feet deep. Among them were Ragheb Turki Mihzah and Youssef Ubayd, who at the time drove heavy machinery for the Damascus governorate.

They said that intelligence officers directed workers to fill the pits with hundreds of bodies that arrived in 50-feet-long refrigerated trucks typically used to transport produce.

In precisely the area that both Mr. Mihzah and Mr. Ubayd said they dug with bulldozers, The Times found evidence of deep pits. The dimensions of many pits match Mr. Mihzah’s description.

The burials at Najha took place during early mornings and at night, according to former grave workers. Government forces would clear out anyone who was in the area and guard the entrance. The officials would confiscate grave workers’ phones and threaten to execute them if they refused to do as told.

Mr. Mihzah, 47, said that as bodies overflowed from a pit, an officer once told a bulldozer driver, “Push them down, or I’ll put you with them.”

Ayman Muhammad Khalil, a guard in the part of Najha used by civilians, said that he sometimes noticed signs of fresh dirt that had been turned over in the morning — a sign of recent digging. He was not allowed to be near the mass graves when the government forces were there.

“We were scared to come here,” said Mr. Khalil, who has worked at Najha for almost two decades and believes that some of his missing friends and relatives may be buried there. “They would take away anyone who would stand here.”

Mr. Khalil walked through the part of Najha that witnesses said was used for mass burials.

Lynsey Addario for The New York Times

Residents who lived next to Najha told The Times they were aware of the mass burials but remained silent for more than a decade, fearing retribution.

Falah al-Za’al, 52, who had a direct view of the graves from his home, lost more than a dozen relatives to the Assad regime, some of whom he believes may be buried at Najha.

Mr. al-Za’al at his window, where he could see the mass graves at Najha cemetery.

Diego Ibarra Sanchez for The New York Times

He never uttered a word about what he saw. “The fear is like when you’re near to death,” he said.

In recent years, bodies were discarded in long trenches

2018 – 24

Mass grave activity at Najha slowed for a time around 2013 because rebel advances in the area made it difficult for the burials to continue.

With limited access to Najha, the government that year shifted operations to another large mass grave site in Qutayfa, a town about 20 miles north of Damascus. Mr. Mihzah, who worked at both sites, said that at Qutayfa, he and others excavated long and narrow trenches.

The government regained control of the area near the Najha cemetery in 2014. The Times was unable to verify activity at Najha in satellite imagery until years later, but residents said that they saw trucks arriving at the cemetery then.

“I was terrified,” said Mohammad Ali al-Saleh, 48, a farmer who initially fled and returned to his home near Najha in 2014. “We saw the refrigerated trucks, but we couldn’t even get close — we would’ve been killed.”

Beginning in 2018, long trenches, similar to those at Qutayfa, began appearing in satellite images analyzed by The Times. The trenches were much longer than the crudely dug pits from years earlier. The operation at Najha had become more systematic.

The trenches appeared to be prepared months in advance of their use. The diggers tunneled for up to hundreds of feet, so as to not have to come back multiple times.

The Times was not able to interview anyone who worked directly on the trenches at Najha. But a longtime guard, Abdul Aziz, who is known by his nickname Abu Jihad, said that he witnessed small and large trucks arriving at the cemetery from 2018 to 2020. Around 2020, Mr. Aziz said that he and his brother saw exposed body parts in a trench where he suspected a mass burial had just happened.

Younes Adnan, a farmer who lived adjacent to the cemetery, said that he first saw excavators and trucks arriving at Najha in 2011 and was still seeing them as recently as 2024.

“Every now and then, we’d see an excavator coming from afar — we didn’t dare approach,” said Mr. Adnan, who believes his brother is buried in a mass grave. “But when the excavator showed up, we knew something abnormal was happening.”

A wall separates the local community from the mass graves.

Diego Ibarra Sanchez for The New York Times

Competition watchdog in UK warns Ticketmaster of potential legal action for Oasis ticket sales

0

The UK’s competition regulator has threatened to take Ticketmaster to court over its pricing practices during the sale of more than 900,000 tickets in 2024 for the 2025 Oasis reunion.

The Competition and Markets Authority wrote a letter on Wednesday (July 2) to the Business and Trade Select Committee, saying it has now “discharged its obligation to consult with Ticketmaster” as “no undertakings have been offered or agreed.”

The CMA launched an investigation in September 2024 to scrutinize “whether the sale of Oasis tickets by Ticketmaster may have breached consumer protection law.”

Following “a thorough investigation,” the regulator said it has found that Ticketmaster sold “Platinum” tickets at nearly 2.5 times standard prices without explaining they offered no additional benefits beyond regular seats.

The regulator also determined the company failed to inform fans about two tiers of standing tickets at different prices, leaving many in lengthy online queues unaware they would face higher-than-expected costs.

However, the letter said: “The CMA did not find evidence that Ticketmaster used an algorithmic pricing model to adjust ticket prices in real time according to changing conditions like high demand.”

“[G]iven that no undertakings have been offered or agreed, [the CMA] is now preparing to litigate the matter if necessary.”

UK Competition and Markets Authority

The algorithmic pricing cited by the CMA refers to Ticketmaster‘s dynamic pricing model that saw some tickets sold in the UK more than doubling in price, with rates surging from around £150 to £355.

Due to the ticketing fiasco in the UK, Oasis decided not to use Ticketmaster‘s dynamic pricing model for its North American tour dates. Oasis said in October: “It is widely accepted that dynamic pricing remains a useful tool to combat ticket touting and keep prices for a significant proportion of fans lower than the market rate and thus more affordable.”

“But, when unprecedented ticket demand (where the entire tour could be sold many times over at the moment tickets go on sale) is combined with technology that cannot cope with that demand, it becomes less effective and can lead to an unacceptable experience for fans.”

In March, the CMA provided a progress update on its probe. At the time, the regulator said Ticketmaster has made changes to “some aspects” of its ticket sales process. However, the CMA said it “does not currently consider these changes are sufficient to address its concerns.”

“Having carefully considered Ticketmaster’s response, the CMA’s view is that there is fundamental disagreement between the CMA and Ticketmaster about whether Ticketmaster’s practices infringed consumer law.”

UK Competition and Markets Authority

Most recently, the regulator said Ticketmaster provided its response on June 16. However, the watchdog said: “Having carefully considered Ticketmaster’s response, the CMA’s view is that there is fundamental disagreement between the CMA and Ticketmaster about whether Ticketmaster’s practices infringed consumer law.”

It added: “Ticketmaster has declined to provide undertakings in the terms sought by the CMA or indicate whether there is a form of undertakings which it would be prepared to offer.”

As a result, the CMA said it has notified Ticketmaster that it “has now discharged its obligation to consult” with the ticketing giant.

“[G]iven that no undertakings have been offered or agreed, [the CMA] is now preparing to litigate the matter if necessary,” it said. However, the watchdog indicated that it would continue to engage with Ticketmaster “in an effort to secure a voluntary resolution.”

MBW has reached out to Ticketmaster for comment.


The Oasis Live ’25 Tour is set to begin on Friday, July 4, at the Principality Stadium in Cardiff, Wales.Music Business Worldwide

Video: UN expert strongly condemns the ‘economy of genocide’

0

UN Special Rapporteur has named dozens of companies implicated what she calls “an economy of genocide".

Challenging Client

0



Client Challenge



JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi unite to challenge Bola Tinubu in Nigeria

0

Mansur Abubakar

BBC News, Abuja

AFP via Getty/Reuters Peter Obi, on the left hand side of the composite photo, wears a black shirt and black-rimmed glasses. He is smiling in the photo. Atiku Abubakar, on the right hand side, wears glasses, a suit and a patterened tie.AFP via Getty/Reuters

Can Peter Obi (left) and Atiku Abubakar (right) work together now?

Nigeria’s two main opposition leaders have joined a new political party to challenge President BolaTinubu and his ruling party in the next election.

Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi have chosen the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as their new political home after breaking away from their respective parties – the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Labour Party (LP).

This is one of the biggest shake-ups in Nigerian politics since the end of military rule in 1999.

Some political heavyweights from Tinubu’s All Progressives Congress (APC) party have also thrown their weight behind the formation.

Why have they joined forces?

The announcement is the culmination of a series of talks between the leaders to put up a united front in the 2027 election, rather than splitting their vote.

Tinubu won the 2023 election with just 37% of the vote after opposition supporters were divided between Abubakar who got 29%, and Obi with 25%.

Obi had broken away from the PDP after the party chose Abubakar as its presidential candidate.

At their unveiling with the ADC, interim chairman David Mark said it was an attempt to save the country’s democracy and to stop Nigeria from becoming a one-party state.

Both the PDP and LP are also battling internal crises which some believe were instigated by external forces.

Analyst Shehu Iliyasu said Abubakar and Obi are learning the lessons of the last election.

“Both Atiku [Abubakar] and Obi felt they came so close in 2023 and would have maybe won on a joint ticket so they want to amend their mistake by working together this time around,” he told the BBC.

Who else is in the ADC?

Getty Images Former Nigerian vice president Atiku Abubakar wearing a traditional gown and holding a microphoneGetty Images

Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar is expected to run for president again in 2027

Tinubu’s biggest challengers in the last elections, Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi are the face of the coalition.

Although there’s a long way to go before candidates are officially announced, political commentators are predicting that 78-year-old Abubakar will have another shot at the presidency – it would be his fifth attempt – with former Anambra governor Obi, 63, as his vice-presidential pick.

Other political heavyweights in the coalition include former Senate President David Mark, who like Atiku is leaving the PDP, former Tinubu ally turned foe Nasir El-Rufai and powerful minister in the last dispensation Rotimi Amaechi.

Is the ADC a new party?

No. The politicians are joining an already existing party which has an acronym closer to the All Democratic Alliance (ADA) they wanted to register.

The party was originally named Alliance for Democratic Change when it was formed in 2005, but it was renamed the African Democratic Congress by the time the party was registered with the Nigerian Independent National Electoral Commission (Inec).

The ADC’s Jamilu Danladi said they were sceptical of getting ADA ready in time and that is why they instead went for the ADC.

Registering a new political party is a difficult process. The Inec chairman recently announced that it had received over 100 applications from associations and groups that have submitted letters of intent to become political parties.

Many of those won’t make it, as apart from other conditions, the group must have a presence in at least 24 out of Nigeria’s 36 states and have a headquarters in Abuja.

The ADC’s Dumebi Kachikwu came fifth in the last presidential election and it currently has two members of parliament in the lower chamber.

Despite not being one of the big parties in Nigeria, the ADC has a good national spread and an active political machinery in each state, which will no doubt be boosted with the money and support of the political heavyweights who have joined it.

Its first presidential candidate in 2007 Professor Pat Utomi was instrumental in it getting national acceptance as he’s a renowned economist.

Can Obi and Abubakar work together again?

This is the question on the lips of many, as Obi’s large support base do not want to see him play second fiddle to anyone else – and this is why he quit the PDP to join the Labour Party in the last election.

While Abubakar’s supporters feel with him being the only former vice-president seeking the presidency, every other politician naturally comes second.

When both politicians worked together in 2019 with Obi serving as Abubakar’s running mate, they lost to the APC’s Muhammadu Buhari.

It will be interesting to see how things pan out from now to 2027.

What are their chances in 2027?

Analyst Ben Kenneth say he believes the coalition has a better chance of defeating Tinubu than last time.

“If you look at what Atiku and Obi got in the last election, it’s clear to see that they would’ve won assuming they worked together, so it’s a good thing they have realised they need each other,” he noted.

However, another analyst Sani Hamisu feels 73-year-old Tinubu has a better chance now than in 2023.

“In Nigeria and Africa, when a leader is in office seeking a second term, he hardly loses, it is very rare and that’s why I feel Tinubu has a better chance now than when he wasn’t in office in 2019,” he said.

Is the ruling party worried?

The ruling party says it is not bothered in the least by the coalition which it does not see as a real threat.

Acting chairman Ali Bukar Dalori told BBC Hausa the coalition would have no impact on the APC.

“Nobody is talking about a coalition except in Abuja. Even in Abuja, they are in a hotel, and when they are defeated in elections, they will leave the country,” he said.

What are the main political parties saying?

The country’s biggest opposition party, the PDP had since ruled out joining the coalition, preferring to face the APC on its own.

The Labour Party also called on its supporters to remain focused and resolute behind the party, denying any plans to join a coalition.

More BBC stories on Nigeria:

Getty Images/BBC A woman looking at her mobile phone and the graphic BBC News AfricaGetty Images/BBC

Penske Automotive purchases Ferrari dealership located in Modena, Italy

0


Penske Automotive acquires Ferrari dealership in Modena, Italy

Converting Agricultural Waste into Green Hydrogen

0

Green hydrogen is emerging as a key complement to solar and wind energy on the path to global sustainability. Its benefits are numerous: it serves as an effective energy storage solution, can be used in vehicles like airplanes without the weight burden of batteries, and can power heating systems or industrial processes without emitting greenhouse gases.

The critical factor for green hydrogen to surpass fossil fuels lies in its production—achieving hydrogen in a clean and efficient manner. The University of Illinois Chicago has recently unveiled a groundbreaking technique for generating it from agricultural or livestock biomass.

How green hydrogen is produced

To start, a brief overview: green hydrogen is produced from renewable energies like wind or solar. Since hydrogen is not typically found in its pure form in nature, it needs to be extracted from compounds such as water. This extraction process, commonly performed through electrolysis, requires energy, which is where renewable sources come into play. If fossil fuels were used instead, it would result in gray hydrogen.

Green hydrogen from solar energy and biomass

The innovation from engineers at the University of Illinois Chicago introduces a method to produce green hydrogen from water using only solar energy and agricultural waste. This technique is remarkable for its energy efficiency, reducing the energy required by 600%. The process involves a solution of agricultural and livestock waste in sulfuric acid as biochar, significantly lowering the electricity needed to produce hydrogen.

So, what is biochar? It is a carbon-rich compound produced through the pyrolysis of biomass in the absence of oxygen. Biochar can sequester carbon in a stable form for many decades, preventing its release as CO2 and improving soil fertility.

In the recent research, adding a biochar solution to the anode during green hydrogen electrolysis reduced the electrical power needs. Experiments show that the most efficient biochar comes from cow manure, reducing the energy required for one unit of hydrogen to one-sixth.

Thus, a single 15-milliampere photovoltaic cell and a current of 0.5 volts—less than the power of an AA battery—were enough to produce green hydrogen. The carbon in the biochar solution reacts with the O2 produced in electrolysis to generate CO2, which can be captured and reused in other industrial processes, such as fertilizer production, as mentioned in this article.

According to the researchers, the high efficiency of the process, achieving a 35% conversion of solar energy into hydrogen, could offer a cheaper and more sustainable alternative to current green hydrogen production methods, reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Self-sufficient farms  

One of the most intriguing prospects suggested by the researchers is a future where farms can combine energy from photovoltaic panels with plant or animal waste to generate green hydrogen, achieving energy self-sufficiency.

A hydrogen fuel cell offers high efficiency in powering machinery and complements other energy sources like solar or wind, regardless of weather or daylight hours. Moreover, the method developed by the University of Illinois Chicago isn’t limited to hydrogen production but can also generate other valuable products from agricultural waste.

If you are interested in learning more about green hydrogen production and other clean energy technologies contributing to a sustainable world, we recommend subscribing to our newsletter at the bottom of this page.

 

Source:

Lawyers claim Kilmar Abrego Garcia was subjected to torture in El Salvador prison, according to reports

0

New court filings detail man’s ordeal after his mistaken deportation became a flashpoint in Trump’s immigration crackdown.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man legally residing in the US state of Maryland, whom the Trump administration mistakenly deported in a high-profile case in March, was severely beaten and subjected to psychological torture in prison there, his lawyers say.

The alleged abuse was detailed in court documents filed in Abrego Garcia’s civil lawsuit against the Trump administration on Wednesday, providing an account of his experiences following his deportation for the first time.

Abrego Garcia’s case has become a flashpoint in the US government’s controversial immigration crackdown since he was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador in March, despite an earlier order by an immigration judge barring such a move.

According to his lawyers, Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador as a teenager to avoid gang violence, arriving in the United States around 2011. He has lived for more than a decade in Maryland, where he and his American wife are raising three children.

He was returned to the US last month and is currently locked in a legal battle with the US government, which has indicted him on charges of migrant smuggling and says it plans to deport him to a third country.

“Plaintiff Abrego Garcia reports that he was subjected to severe mistreatment upon arrival at CECOT, including but not limited to severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture,” his lawyers said in the filing, referring to the Salvadoran mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Centre, or CECOT.

Severe beatings, threats

The filings, made in a civil suit in federal court against the US government brought by Abrego Garcia’s wife in Maryland, said her husband was hit and kicked so frequently upon his arrival at the prison that the next day his body was covered in lumps and bruises.

The filings also said he and other inmates were forced to kneel for nine hours straight throughout the night, or were hit by guards, in a cruel exercise of sleep deprivation.

It said prison staff repeatedly threatened to transfer Abrego Garcia to cells with gang members who would “tear” him apart, and claimed that he lost 31 pounds (14kg) in his first two weeks in jail as a result of the abuse.

‘Administrative error’

Abrego Garcia was detained by immigration officials and deported to El Salvador on March 15. Trump and US officials have accused him of belonging to the notorious MS-13 gang, which he denies.

The deportation took place despite an order from a US immigration judge in 2019, which barred Abrego Garcia from being sent back to El Salvador because he likely faced persecution there from gangs.

Abrego Garcia’s treatment gained worldwide attention, with critics of Trump’s aggressive immigration policy saying it demonstrated how officials were ignoring due process in their zeal to deport migrants. The Trump administration later described the deportation as an “administrative error”.

Last month, the US government complied with a directive from the court to return Abrego Garcia to the US, but only after having secured an indictment charging him with working with coconspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the US illegally.

He is currently being detained in Nashville, Tennessee, while his criminal case is pending, having pleaded not guilty to illegally transporting undocumented immigrants.

The US government is arguing that the new civil suit is now moot, as Abrego Garcia has been returned from El Salvador. It has said it plans to deport him to a third country after he is released from custody.

Abrego Garcia a ‘criminal’ for DHS

In the wake of the latest court filings, the Trump administration doubled down on its attacks on Abrego Garcia as a dangerous illegal immigrant.

In a post on the social media platform X, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said the “media’s sympathetic narrative about this criminal illegal gang member has completely fallen apart”.

“Once again the media is falling all over themselves to defend Kilmar Abrego Garcia,” it said.

“This illegal alien is an MS-13 gang member, alleged human trafficker, and a domestic abuser,” DHS claimed, without providing any evidence.

House GOP Struggles to Pass Trump’s Tax Bill as Members from Center and Far-Right Resist During Late-Night Session

0

House Republicans strained through a day of starts and stops trying to advance President Donald Trump’s tax and spending cuts package, GOP leaders working almost around the clock to persuade skeptical holdouts to send the bill to his desk by the Fourth of July deadline.

A procedural roll call that started late Wednesday night was held open into Thursday morning as several Republicans refused to give their votes. With few to spare from their slim majority, the outcome was in jeopardy. House Speaker Mike Johnson had recalled lawmakers to Washington, eager to seize on the momentum of the bill’s passage the day before in the Senate, and he vowed to press ahead.

“Our way is to plow through and get it done,” Johnson said, emerging in the middle of the night from a series of closed-door meetings. He expected votes later Thursday morning. “We will meet our July 4th deadline.”

But as voting stalled Trump, who hosted lawmakers Wednesday at the White House and spoke with some by phone, lashed out in a midnight post: “What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove???” He also warned starkly of political fallout from the delay “COSTING YOU VOTES!!!”

The idea of quickly convening to for a vote on the more than 800-page bill was a risky gambit, one designed to meet Trump’s demand for a holiday finish. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way, often succeeding by the narrowest of margins — just one vote. Their slim 220-212 majority leaves little room for defections.

Several Republicans are balking at being asked to rubber-stamp the Senate version less than 24 hours after passage. A number of moderate Republicans from competitive districts have objected to the Senate bill’s cuts to Medicaid, while conservatives have lambasted the legislation as straying from their fiscal goals.

It falls to Johnson and his team to convince them that the time for negotiations is over. They will need assistance from Trump to close the deal, and lawmakers headed to the White House for a two-hour session Wednesday to talk to the president about their concerns.

“The president’s message was, ‘We’re on a roll,’” said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. “He wants to see this.”

Republicans are relying on their majority hold of Congress to push the package over a wall of unified Democratic opposition. No Democrats voted for bill in the Senate and none were expected to do so in the House.

“Hell no!” said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, flanked by fellow Democrats outside the Capitol.

In an early warning sign of Republican resistance, a resolution setting up terms for debating Trump’s bill barely cleared the House Rules Committee on Wednesday morning. As soon as it came to the full House, it stalled out as GOP leadership waited for lawmakers who were delayed coming back to Washington and conducted closed-door negotiations with holdouts.

By nightfall, as pizzas and other dinners were arriving at the Capitol, the next steps were uncertain.

Trump pushes Republicans to do ‘the right thing’

The bill would extend and make permanent various individual and business tax breaks from Trump’s first term, plus temporarily add new ones he promised during the 2024 campaign. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. In all, the legislation contains about $4.5 trillion in tax cuts over 10 years.

The bill also provides about $350 billion for defense and Trump’s immigration crackdown. Republicans partially pay for it all through less spending on Medicaid and food assistance. The Congressional Budget Office projects the bill will add about $3.3 trillion to the federal debt over the coming decade.

The House passed its version of the bill in May by a single vote, despite worries about spending cuts and the overall price tag. Now it’s being asked to give final passage to a version that, in many respects, exacerbates those concerns. The Senate bill’s projected impact on the nation’s debt, for example, is significantly higher.

“Lets go Republicans and everyone else,” Trump said in a late evening post.

The high price of opposing Trump’s bill

Johnson is intent on meeting Trump’s timeline and betting that hesitant Republicans won’t cross the president because of the heavy political price they would have to pay.

They need only look to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who announced his intention to vote against the legislation over the weekend. Soon, the president was calling for a primary challenger to the senator and criticizing him on social media. Tillis quickly announced he would not seek a third term.

One House Republican who has staked out opposition to the bill, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, is being targeted by Trump’s well-funded political operation.

Democrats target vulnerable Republicans to join them in opposition

Flanked by nearly every member of his caucus, Democratic Leader Jeffries of New York delivered a pointed message: With all Democrats voting “no,” they only need to flip four Republicans to prevent the bill from passing.

Jeffries invoked the “courage” of the late Sen. John McCain giving a thumbs-down to the GOP effort to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act, and singled out Republicans from districts expected to be highly competitive in 2026, including two from Pennsylvania.

“Why would Rob Bresnahan vote for this bill? Why would Scott Perry vote for this bill?” Jeffries asked.

Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that Medicaid cuts would result in lives lost and food stamp cuts would be “literally ripping the food out of the mouths of children, veterans and seniors,” Jeffries said Monday.

Republicans say they are trying to right-size the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse.

The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and applies existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to more beneficiaries. States will also pick up more of the cost for food benefits.

The driving force behind the bill, however, is the tax cuts. Many expire at the end of this year if Congress doesn’t act.

The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 tax cut for the top quintile. That’s compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired.

Trump’s major legislation set for final vote during late-night House session in the US

0

Brandon Drenon

BBC News, Washington DC

Watch: Trump reacts to the Senate narrowly passing his budget bill

The US House of Representatives is working in the middle of the night as Donald Trump and his allies try to pressurise holdouts in the president’s own Republican Party to back his mega-bill on tax and spending in a final vote.

The sprawling legislation, which could define Trump’s second term in office, passed a key procedural vote after 03:00 EDT (07:00 GMT).

Trump’s bill has been opposed not only by opposition Democrats, but by a handful of Republicans who criticise its potential impact on national finances, healthcare and other issues.

The bill ground through the Senate earlier this week in another overnight session. Trump hopes it will pass by Friday.

Both chambers of Congress are controlled by Trump’s Republicans, but within the party several factions are fighting over key policies in the lengthy legislation.

The House, or lower chamber, approved an earlier version of the bill in May with a margin of just one vote, and this bill, with new amendments that have frustrated some Republicans, must now be reconciled with the Senate version.

The bill narrowly cleared the Senate, or upper chamber, on Tuesday. Vice-President JD Vance cast a tie-breaking vote after more than 24 hours of debate and resistance from some Republican senators.

It has so far proven equally tricky for Trump’s allies to pass the bill through the House.

After about seven hours of wrangling that led to most lawmakers clearing from the chamber on Wednesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson scheduled a vote on the rule – a procedural vote that allows the legislation to be brought to the floor for a full vote.

This hurdle was ultimately cleared several hours later, and was seen as a signal that Republicans might have the support they needed after all.

The president has been very involved in attempting to persuade the holdouts and held several meetings at the White House on Wednesday in hopes of winning them over.

On Wednesday, he took to social media to apply further pressure, saying that the “House is ready to vote tonight”. He added that Republicans are “united” to deliver “massive growth”.

Ralph Norman, a House Republican from South Carolina, attended one of the meetings but wasn’t persuaded.

“There won’t be any vote until we can satisfy everybody,” he said, adding he believes there are about 25 other Republicans who are currently opposed to it. The chamber can only lose about three Republicans to pass the measure.

“I got problems with this bill,” he said. “I got trouble with all of it.”

Sticking points include the question of how much the bill will add to the US national deficit, and how deeply it will cut healthcare and other social programmes.

During previous signs of rebellion against Trump at Congress, Republican lawmakers have ultimately fallen in line.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise told reporters that Republicans were still on their way to Washington to vote, and that several had flight delays due to bad weather.

What is at stake this time is the defining piece of legislation for Trump’s second term. But several factions stand in its way.

The deficit hawks

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the version of the bill that was passed on Tuesday by the Senate could add $3.3tn (£2.4tn) to the US national deficit over the next 10 years. That compares with $2.8tn that could be added by the earlier version that was narrowly passed by the House.

The deficit means the difference between what the US government spends and the revenue it receives.

This outraged the fiscal hawks in the conservative House Freedom Caucus, who have threatened to tank the bill.

Many of them are echoing claims made by Elon Musk, Trump’s former adviser and campaign donor, who has repeatedly lashed out at lawmakers for considering a bill that will ultimately add to US national debt.

Shortly after the Senate passed the bill, Texas congressman Chip Roy, of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus, was quick to signal his frustration.

He said the odds of meeting Trump’s 4 July deadline had lengthened.

Getty Images Congressman Ralph Norman with his head in his hands looking exasperated at a hearingGetty Images

Congressman Ralph Norman is among the Republicans threatening to vote down the bill

Freedom Caucus chairman Andy Harris of Tennessee told Fox News that Musk was right to say the US cannot sustain these deficits. “He understands finances, he understands debts and deficits, and we have to make further progress.”

On Tuesday, Conservative congressman Andy Ogles went as far as to file an amendment that would completely replace the Senate version of the bill, which he called a “dud”, with the original House-approved one.

Ohio Republican Warren Davison posted on X: “Promising someone else will cut spending in the future does not cut spending.”

A pair of bar charts compare the estimated increases and savings in US federal spending from Trump's budget bill. The first bar chart shows the cumulative cost increases over 10 years. It highlights tax-cut extensions (worth $4.5tn), defence (worth $150bn) and borders (worth $129bn). The bar representing tax-cut extensions is much longer than any of the bars on the bar chart that shows total savings. This second bar chart highlights Medicaid (worth $930bn in savings), green energy (worth $488bn) and food benefits (worth $287bn)

The Medicaid guardians

Representatives from poorer districts are worried about the Senate version of the bill harming their constituents, which could also hurt them at the polls in 2026.

According to the Hill, six Republicans were planning to vote down the bill due to concerns about cuts to key provisions, including cuts to medical coverage.

Some of the critical Republicans have attacked the Senate’s more aggressive cuts to Medicaid, the healthcare programme relied upon by millions of low-income Americans.

“I’ve been clear from the start that I will not support a final reconciliation bill that makes harmful cuts to Medicaid, puts critical funding at risk, or threatens the stability of healthcare providers,” said congressman David Valadao, who represents a swing district in California.

This echoes the criticism of opposition House Democrats, whose leader, Hakeem Jeffries, posted a picture of himself on Wednesday to Instagram, holding a baseball bat and vowing to “keep the pressure on Trump’s One Big Ugly Bill”.

Other Republicans have signalled a willingness to compromise. Randy Fine, from Florida, told the BBC he had frustrations with the Senate version of the bill, but that he would vote it through the House because “we can’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good”.

House Republicans had wrestled over how much to cut Medicaid and food subsidies in the initial version their chamber passed. They needed the bill to reduce spending, in order to offset lost revenue from the tax cuts contained in the legislation.

The Senate made steeper cuts to both areas in the version passed on Tuesday.

Changes to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (better known as Obamacare) in the Senate’s bill would see roughly 12 million Americans lose health insurance by 2034, according to a CBO report published on Saturday.

Under the version originally passed by the House, a smaller number of 11 million Americans would have had their coverage stripped, according to the CBO.

Hakeem Jeffries/Instagram US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries holds a brown baseball bat while standing in an office. He is surrounded by chairs including a brown couch with yellow cushions which is behind him. He is wearing a blue dress shirt and black trousersHakeem Jeffries/Instagram

House Democrats, led by Hakeem Jeffries, are united against the bill

The state tax (Salt) objectors

The bill also deals with the question of how much taxpayers can deduct from the amount they pay in federal taxes, based on how much they pay in state and local taxes (Salt). This, too, has become a controversial issue.

There is currently a $10,000 cap, which expires this year. Both the Senate and House have approved increasing this to $40,000.

But in the Senate-approved version, the cap would return to $10,000 after five years. This change could pose a problem for some House Republicans.

Watch as the Senate narrowly passes Trump’s bill

A thin, grey banner promoting the US Politics Unspun newsletter. On the right, there is an image of the Capitol Building against a background of vertical red, grey and blue stripes. The banner reads: "The newsletter that cuts through the noise.”

Follow the twists and turns of Trump’s second term with North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher’s weekly US Politics Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can sign up here. Those outside the UK can sign up here.