1.9 C
New York
Wednesday, February 18, 2026
Home Blog Page 207

I played a role in constructing the addictive nature of social media and now I foresee warning labels on the horizon. And this is just the beginning.

0

We don’t need to fear AI taking our jobs. We need to fear it taking our attention. Social media hooked us. AI is perfecting the addiction. But a movement to reclaim our focus is gaining ground.

I spent my early 20s at Google learning how to hack human attention. I analyzed data to understand exactly how to get people to click, scroll, and stay hooked to YouTube or Google Search. I was good at it. The work was fascinating, using behavioral science and machine learning to predict and influence what billions of people would do next.

What I didn’t realize then was that I was helping build the architecture of addiction that now defines modern life.

Last month, a billboard went up on Canal Street in NYC: “Scrolling Kills.” It kills our attention. Our time. The moments with our children, our ideas, our lives.

Within hours, it was everywhere, not because of clever marketing, but because it named what millions feel every day. Over one hundred million people have downloaded focus apps in the past year alone because they recognize this reality: hours vanishing into algorithmic black holes, every notification pulling them further from what actually matters.

Here’s what Washington is missing: parents are now putting screen time limits on their own phones, not their teenagers’. Adults can’t model behavior they can’t control themselves. Productivity has flatlined despite unprecedented technology because we spend half our workday fighting for focus. Willpower doesn’t work against systems that were engineered, tested, and perfected to be irresistible.

This is the context missing from every congressional hearing on social media. The problem isn’t misinformation or mental health in isolation. It’s that we’ve allowed private companies to exploit behavioral psychology against the public. Silicon Valley spent the last decade optimizing for engagement. The rest of us lost something we can’t get back.

Warning labels are a start. But they’re an admission that what’s happening to us is dangerous enough to require one.

The Real Cost of Doomscrolling

In June 2024, U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy called for warning labels on social media, backed by 42 state attorneys general. Around the same time, Jonathan Haidt’s “The Anxious Generation” was climbing bestseller lists with the same message: the mental health crisis among young people rose in lockstep with smartphones. Dr. Murthy was direct: we have the evidence. Now we need action.

But Gen Z isn’t the only generation affected. Adults are losing just as much time, and the productivity cost is staggering. Research shows the average worker burns two hours daily on non-work screen time during work hours. Add context switching, where every interruption takes 15 minutes to recover from, and The Economist estimates the annual U.S. productivity loss exceeds $1 trillion. France calculates it at 2.9% of their entire GDP.

We fantasize about four-day work weeks. We can’t even protect five-day ones.

The mechanics are familiar: every scroll triggers dopamine, every notification promises validation. Stanford’s Dr. Anna Lembke writes in Dopamine Nation that we’re trapped in engineered pleasure loops designed to leave us perpetually unsatisfied, always reaching for the next hit. The platforms built this deliberately.

Then AI arrived, and the system became unbeatable. We’re scrolling through an internet where AI now generates more content than humans do. Our brains weren’t built to filter this. Harvard Medical School researchers have documented how this rewires our neural pathways, increasing anxiety, shrinking attention spans, and destroying our capacity for deep work.

The average American now spends 5 hours and 30 minutes per day on their phone, nearly a third of waking hours. Most get their first smartphone at age 12. By 40, you’ve spent seven full years staring at a screen. And usage is still increasing.

Why Warning Labels Matter

On October 13, 2025, California became the second state to require mental health warning labels on social media platforms. Starting January 1, 2027, platforms must display warnings that social media “can have a profound risk of harm to the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents.”

This matters because California is Silicon Valley’s home. When Big Tech’s backyard demands accountability, the tide has turned. It also validates Dr. Murthy’s call for tobacco-style warnings backed by 42 state attorneys general. Warning labels work, they worked for tobacco and alcohol by shifting cultural norms and creating legal liability that forces real change.

But warning labels are necessary, not sufficient.

What We Need Now

For lawmakers: Don’t stop at warning labels. Roll out California’s model nationwide. Require transparency about algorithmic manipulation. Fund independent research. Hold platforms liable for design patterns that systematically undermine users’ ability to control their own time and attention.

For platforms: The next generation of users is opting out. Data from focus apps like Opal shows seventy percent of users are students who’ve done the math on what infinite scroll costs them. They’re not waiting for regulation. The window to redesign these systems voluntarily is closing. Change the product, not just the PR.

For parents, educators, and employers: Stop waiting for policy. Tools exist now. Screen time awareness is becoming as fundamental as nutrition. Create environments that protect attention and reward focus.

For individuals: Your attention is your most valuable asset. Protect it like you’d protect your health.

The Movement Is Already Here

In 2008, working at Google, I wrote the first business plan for a focus app to counter this problem. I knew even then that what we were building wasn’t designed for human wellbeing. It took 11 years to build it, years of watching the greatest technological minds spend their days figuring out how to make you click one more ad.

Social media platforms profit from addiction. Their business model depends on it. That’s why individual willpower fails and why we need systemic change. We need to realign technology with human well-being, not quarterly earnings.

The distraction economy is stealing our mental health, our productivity, and our ability to be present for what matters. Warning labels are just the beginning. We’ll look back at this moment the same way we look back at tobacco ads proclaiming “More Doctors Smoke Camels.”

Your attention is yours. Take it back.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

Brennen O’Neil, a Top IMer, Commits to Arizona State for 2026

0

By Terin Frodyma on SwimSwam

Fitter and Faster Swim Camps is the proud sponsor of SwimSwam’s College Recruiting Channel and all commitment news. For many, swimming in college is a lifelong dream that is pursued with dedication and determination. Fitter and Faster is proud to honor these athletes and those who supported them on their journey.

Fort Collins Area Swim Team’s Brennen O’Neil has committed to Arizona State University for the fall of 2026.

O’Neil was featured in the “Best of the Rest Section” in SwimSwam’s ranking of the top 20 recruits in the boys’ class of 2026.

I’m proud to announce my commitment to ASU Swim & Dive. I’m very grateful for this opportunity. I’d like to thank my parents, the ASU Coaching Staff, and FAST for teaching me world class character through excellence in swimming. Most of all, I would like to thank God for leading me here. Forks up ASU 🔱🔱

O’Niel hails from Windsor, Colo., and represents Fossil Ridge High School. As a junior, O’Neil won the 200 IM for the 2nd time at the CHSAA Boys 5A State Championship meet this past May; he clocked 1:49.60 to take the win (altitude adjusted to 1:48.40). The year earlier, he won the event in a best time of 1:49.13 (altitude adjusted to 1:47.93).

At the 2024 Speedo Winter Juniors Championships – West, O’Neil swam his fastest ever 400 IM, clocking 3:51.83, finishing 11th overall. He also placed 18th in he 200 IM in 1:48.05, his fastest ever swim not adjusted for altitude.

A year earlier at the same meet, O’Neil notched two distance freestyle best times: the 1000 free in 9:27.52 and the 1650 free in 15:37.23.

O’Neil also holds a noteworthy best time in the 200 backstroke from the Speedo Sectionals in Rochester this past March, 1:46.07. He also holds bests of 1:39.50 in the 200 free and 4:34.76 in the 500 free, both adjusted for altitude.

Best Times SCY (PB Non-Altitude Adjusted)

  • 200 IM: 1:47.93* (1:48.05)
  • 400 IM: 3:51.83
  • 200 Free: 1:39.50* (1:40.70)
  • 500 Free: 4:34.76* (4:36.24)
  • 1000 Free: 9:27.52
  • 1650 Free: 15:37.23
  • 200 Back: 1:46.07

*Altitude-adjusted

The Arizona State men won the team title at the 2025 Big 12 Swimming and Diving Championships last season. They also finished 6th at the NCAA Swimming and Diving Championships.

Based on O’Neil’s best times, he would have qualified for the ‘B’ final in the 400 IM and 200 back, and the ‘C’ final in the 200 IM.

O’Neil is super dynamic; he holds respectable additional best times in plenty of other events, including the 200 breast (2:01.34) and the 100 back (49.78).

While he ranks well among IMers, he also holds his own against distance freestylers. His scoring potential within the IM events will likely be his draw away from the distance free events.

O’Neil joins Ethan Linville, Oliver Munn, Jake Lloyd, Tyler Porter, Ian Disosway, Dillon Albertyn, Onur Oksuz, London Rising, Caleb Kattu, Jack Culberson, and Henry Lyness in the Sun Devils’ 2026 recruiting class.

About the Fitter and Faster Swim Tour 

Fitter & Faster Swim Camps feature the most innovative teaching platforms for competitive swimmers of all levels. Camps are produced year-round throughout the USA and Canada. All camps are led by elite swimmers and coaches. Visit fitterandfaster.com to find or request a swim camp near you.

FFT SOCIAL

Instagram – @fitterandfasterswimtour
Facebook – @fitterandfastertour
Twitter – @fitterandfaster

FFT is a SwimSwam partner.

Read the full story on SwimSwam: “Best of the Rest” IMer Brennen O’Neil Commits to Arizona State for 2026

Exoskeleton Enhances Underwater Kicks to Prolong Dive Duration

0

Divers may soon be able to get a welcome boost to their flutter kicks thanks to an exoskeleton developed by researchers at Peking University (PU). By shouldering some of the burden of underwater swimming, the device could also make scuba tanks last longer.

Watching a diver glide through the water under the sea’s surface makes the activity look quite calm and gentle, but the process actually engages the largest muscle groups in the body – the legs. All of that muscle activation requires oxygen for fuel, which is provided by a diver’s tank. A diver using an 80-cubic-ft tank at a depth of 65.6 ft can expect that oxygen to last, on average, about 35-50 minutes.

In an effort to boost how much time a swimmer could stay under on one scuba tank, instead of focusing on breathing apparatus, the PU researchers took a novel approach: decreasing the energy expended while swimming and therefore oxygen needed by the diver.

The exoskeleton they created consists of multiple parts. There are two sealed motor units that mount to the diver’s back. These are connected to flexible Bowden cables that run down to lightweight cuffs on the diver’s thighs and shanks. A waist strap stabilizes the entire unit which mounts outside a diver’s wetsuit. The entire system weighs about 9 kg (20 lb), with most of the mass applied to the back of the diver.

Researchers carefully measured the different phases of a diver’s flutter kick to determine when the exoskeleton could help the most

Peking University

The real magic of the exoskeleton comes from the sensors embedded in the system called Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs), which transmit the position of the legs to the motor. This allows the motor to sense where in the flutter kick the legs are as the diver swims and adjust the force on the Bowden cables as needed. During the downstroke of the kick, thanks to a built-in clutch, the motor engages and assists the motion. For the upstroke, the motor is disengaged so that the system doesn’t fight the diver’s recovery motion.

To test the system, the researchers attached an exoskeleton to six certified divers who used it in a 50-meter (164-ft) swimming pool at a depth of two meters (6.6 ft). Each diver completed three 100-meter (328-ft) underwater swims using a flutter kick both with and without the exoskeleton and with it powered on and off. The test revealed impressive results, reducing quadriceps and calf activation by just over 20%, and decreasing air intake by 22.7%.

The researchers say more testing is needed to further refine the exoskeleton. They plan to use computational fluid dynamics to map water resistance on divers; test in more dynamic real-world conditions beyond the swimming pool; alter swimming speeds and styles; experiment with different lighter-weight materials; and apply more sensors that will monitor metrics like heart rate in addition to air consumption.

“Our research extends the application boundary of wearable robots and introduces a brand-new scenario for exoskeleton studies,” write the researchers in the study, which has been published in the journal, IEEE Transactions on Robotics. “Essentially, powered exoskeletons provide an enhancement of human functionality, and special environments or working conditions do not entirely diminish their utility.

“Our work provides a reference for the design and assessment of future underwater assistive devices, with the potential to strengthen the connection between humans and the ocean and to broaden the horizons of exploration.”

Source: Peking University

Violations of Gaza ceasefire

0

We compare and contrast Israel’s ceasefire deal with Hamas and the reality on the ground within 24 hours.

Spotify brings audiobooks to 5 additional European countries, including Sweden

0

Spotify continues to expand the markets in which it offers audiobooks, announcing on Tuesday (November 18) that audiobook streaming is now available in five more European markets, including its home country of Sweden.

Audiobooks are now also available in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Monaco, the company wrote on its blog.

As in some other markets, Premium subscribers will get 12 free hours of audiobooks per month, with the option of buying more time in 10-hour increments. Free users have the option of buying audiobooks individually.

For the first time at launch, Spotify is offering listeners the option to subscribe to Audiobooks+, a recurring monthly add-on that offers additional audiobook hours and enables managers of Family and Duo accounts to purchase access for sub-accounts.

The 12 hours of included time is at the low end of the range that Spotify offers at no extra cost to Premium subscribers. In the US, UK, Canada and elsewhere, Premium plans come with 15 hours. The variation is reportedly due to differences in the deals Spotify has signed with publishers.

Spotify also announced that it is beta-testing a new ‘recap’ feature for English-language titles, offering personalized summaries of a book based on where the listeners last left off.

In the mostly Nordic countries where audiobooks launched this week, Spotify says listeners will have access to 300,000 audiobooks, including “the region’s largest selection of English-language catalog available on a consumption-based service” and a “thoughtfully curated” local-language catalog.

“The Nordics are home to some of the world’s most passionate audiobook listeners and some of Spotify’s most engaged communities. With Audiobooks in Premium now available in these countries, we’re opening new doors for both local and international authors and publishers to reach more listeners than ever before,” Spotify said.

Spotify is painting its expansion into audiobooks – which began two years ago – as a commercial success. Data shared with Bloomberg last month, and reiterated on its blog Tuesday, showed that the number of audiobook listeners in English-language markets grew 36% over the past year, with listening hours up 37%.

“We’re opening new doors for both local and international authors and publishers to reach more listeners than ever before.”

Spotify

Spotify says more than half (52%) of audiobook listeners globally are between the ages of 18 and 34, “underscoring how we’re connecting a new generation with the power of storytelling. Leading publishers such as Bloomsbury, HarperCollins, and Lagardère have even credited Spotify with driving double-digit growth in audio sales.”


Spotify’s move into audiobooks has sparked some controversy within the music industry, particularly in the US, where the streaming platform’s decision to treat its subscriptions as music/audiobook “bundles” resulted in a reduction of mechanical royalty payouts to publishers and songwriters.

That move has triggered legal actions on behalf of song rights owners, including a lawsuit brought by The Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) against Spotify, which continues in federal court despite a setback earlier this year, and a complaint against Spotify filed with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

The expansion of its audiobooks service comes hot on the heels of another Spotify product expansion – one that’s arguably going to have more impact on the music business.

Spotify recently launched its long-awaited “super-premium” tier for music superfans in five pilot markets – India, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and the United Arab Emirates.

Dubbed ‘Premium Platinum,’ the new tier includes lossless audio quality (something for which Spotify users have been clamoring for years), AI-powered features like AI DJ and AI Playlist, and mixing tools, among other things.Music Business Worldwide

One of the deadliest strikes on western Ukraine: Russian assault on Ternopil targets residential buildings

0

At least 16 people have been killed and dozens more wounded in a Russian drone and missile attack on the western city of Ternopil that hit two blocks of flats, Ukrainian officials say.

Among the 64 wounded were 14 children, police said, in one of the deadliest Russian strikes on western Ukraine since the full-scale war began in February 2022.

Two other western regions were hit, Lviv and Ivano-Frankivsk, and a drone attack targeted three districts of the northern city of Kharkiv, wounding more than 30 people. Photos posted online showed buildings and cars ablaze.

Power cuts were affecting a number of regions across the country, Ukraine’s energy ministry said.

Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky said Russia had fired more than 470 drones and 47 missiles, leaving “significant destruction”. He warned that people could be trapped under the rubble in Ternopil.

The devastation caused by the Russian strikes soon became clear. A video shared by Zelensky showed that one of the two blocks of flats had completely caved in. The interior minister Ihor Klymenko said it had been destroyed between the third and the ninth floor.

Plumes of smoke poured from windows and small fires burned outside the tenement.

A giant smoke cloud rose in the distance behind the Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Help in Ternopil, as sirens blared throughout the city.

Energy facilities, transport and civil infrastructure were damaged elsewhere in western Ukraine.

The energy sector came under attack in Ivano-Frankivsk region where two of three people reported wounded were children.

The head of Lviv region said an energy facility had been struck.

The Russian strikes came a day after Ukraine’s military said it had fired US-supplied longer-range Atacms missiles at military targets inside Russia, the first time they have admitted using the Atacms on Russian soil.

Russia’s defence ministry accused Ukraine of firing four of the missiles at the southern city of Voronezh but said they had all been shot down by air defences.

Meanwhile, Zelensky is heading to the Turkish capital Ankara, in an attempt to revive a US bid to end the war. He will hold talks with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan amid reports that President Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff has been working on a plan with Russian counterpart Kirill Dmitriev.

The Kremlin said no Russian representative would be joining the talks in Ankara. Spokesman Dmitry Peskov declined to comment on a media report that the US and Russia had been secretly working on a peace plan for Ukraine.

“In this case, there is nothing new that we can inform you about,” Peskov told journalists on Wednesday.

His comments came amid reports that Zelensky was due to meet two top US army officials in Kyiv on Thursday. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll and Army Chief of Staff General Randy George are the most senior US military officials to visit the Ukrainian capital since President Donald Trump took office, Reuters reports.

In a separate development, Romania’s defence ministry said a Russian drone had flown for about 8km (5 miles) through its airspace in the early hours of Wednesday. The drone then crossed into Ukraine and Moldova before returning to Romania, it said.

Romanian and German air force planes were scrambled in response to the incursion and the defence ministry said it was unclear where the drone had come down.

Poland also deployed jets early on Wednesday and temporarily closed two airports in the southeast in response to the strikes in western Ukraine.

As the fourth anniversary of the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion approaches next February, Moscow and Kyiv remain fundamentally opposed in their views of how to end the war.

Earlier this month Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Russia’s conditions for a peace deal had not changed since Putin laid them out in 2024.

Challenge from Client

0



Client Challenge



JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

See the Changes in Home Insurance Premiums in Your Area

0

Insurance premiums are rising fast in the parts of the United States most exposed to climate-related disasters like wildfires and hurricanes.

New research shows that, as insurance has sharply pushed up the cost of owning a home, the price shock is starting to reverberate through the broader real estate market.

Rising insurance costs are eating into household budgets.

Note: “High end” refers to the top decile of homeowner payments in each county. The 2023 values are shown for Vermont because of discrepancies in the source data.

The New York Times

In some areas of the country that are exposed to disasters, homes are not selling because prospective buyers can’t afford both the mortgage and the insurance.

In parts of the hail-prone Midwestern states, insurance now eats up more than one-fifth of the average homeowner’s total housing payments, including mortgage costs and property taxes. In Orleans Parish, La., that number is nearly 30 percent.

Home insurance costs have soared where climate hazards are highest.

Source: Keys and Mulder (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2025)

Note: The 2023 values are shown for Vermont because of discrepancies in the source data.

The New York Times

Nationally, insurance rates have risen by an average of 58 percent since 2018, outpacing inflation by a substantial margin. But that growth has been highly uneven across the United States.

Source: Keys and Mulder (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2025)

Note: “High end” refers to the top decile of homeowner payments in each county. The 2023 values are shown for Vermont because of discrepancies in the source data.

The New York Times

Places that are most vulnerable to climate-related disasters like hurricanes, fires and hail are seeing some of the largest premium increases. It’s not always the case that the highest climate risk translates into the highest insurance costs. Local policies and regulations have helped keep prices lower in high-risk places, like parts of California. Other factors, like a homeowner’s credit score, can affect premiums, too.

What’s driving up insurance prices?

Since 2017, an obscure part of the insurance market, known as reinsurance, has helped push up premiums. Insurance companies buy reinsurance to help limit their exposure when a catastrophe hits. Over the past several years, reinsurance companies have experienced what Benjamin Keys and Philip Mulder, the researchers who led the new study, call a “climate epiphany.” As a result, the rates they charge to protect home insurance companies against catastrophic losses have roughly doubled.

Insurance providers have, in turn, passed these costs on to homeowners. The rapid repricing of climate risk is responsible for about 20 percent of home insurance premium increases since 2017, according to Dr. Keys and Dr. Mulder.

What else is contributing to high rates? Rebuilding costs are responsible for about 35 percent of the recent changes, the research found. Population shifts and inflation are factors, too.

High insurance prices are weighing down home values.

Since 2018, a financial shock in the home insurance market has meant that homes in the ZIP codes most exposed to hurricanes and wildfires sell for an average of $43,900 less than they otherwise would have, the research found.

Source: Zillow

Note: Chart shows percent change in Zillow Home Value Index since 2018.

The New York Times

In many places, insurance has been a relatively small part of the homebuying equation. Now, for many, it’s a major consideration.

For several homeowners we interviewed in Louisiana, monthly insurance costs are now higher than their home loan payments.

The research shows buyers may be factoring rising insurance costs into the prices they’re willing to pay for homes. As a result, homes in some areas are selling for less.

Methodology

Benjamin Keys and Philip Mulder calculated annual homeowners’ insurance costs by separating mortgage and tax payments from loan-level escrow data obtained from CoreLogic, a property and risk analytics firm. Households whose payments were captured by CoreLogic were not necessarily present in all years of data from 2014 to 2024.

The home insurance share of total home payments is based on mean values. Total home payments include insurance, property tax and mortgage principal and interest costs. Escrow payments typically do not include utilities, homeowners’ association fees.

In October, South Africa experiences a rise in inflation rate to 3.6%

0


South Africa's inflation rate rises to 3.6% in October

Are AI hacking claims causing a dangerous divide among cybersecurity experts? | Business and Economy News

0

An alarming watershed for artificial intelligence, or an overhyped threat?

AI startup Anthropic’s recent announcement that it detected the world’s first artificial intelligence-led hacking campaign has prompted a multitude of responses from cybersecurity experts.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

While some observers have raised the alarm about the long-feared arrival of a dangerous inflection point, others have greeted the claims with scepticism, arguing that the startup’s account leaves out crucial details and raises more questions than answers.

In a report on Friday, Anthropic said its assistant Claude Code was manipulated to carry out 80-90 percent of a “large-scale” and “highly sophisticated” cyberattack, with human intervention required “only sporadically”.

Anthropic, the creator of the popular Claude chatbot, said the attack aimed to infiltrate government agencies, financial institutions, tech firms and chemical manufacturing companies, though the operation was only successful in a small number of cases.

The San Francisco-based company, which attributed the attack to Chinese state-sponsored hackers, did not specify how it had uncovered the operation, nor identify the “roughly” 30 entities that it said had been targeted.

Roman V Yampolskiy, an AI and cybersecurity expert at the University of Louisville, said there was no doubt that AI-assisted hacking posed a serious threat, though it was difficult to verify the precise details of Anthropic’s account.

“Modern models can write and adapt exploit code, sift through huge volumes of stolen data, and orchestrate tools faster and more cheaply than human teams,” Yampolskiy told Al Jazeera.

“They lower the skills barrier for entry and increase the scale at which well-resourced actors can operate. We are effectively putting a junior cyber-operations team in the cloud, rentable by the hour.”

Yampolskiy said he expected AI to increase both the frequency and the severity of attacks.

Jaime Sevilla, director of Epoch AI, said he did not see much new in Anthropic’s report, but past experience dictated that AI-assisted attacks were both feasible and likely to become increasingly common.

“This is likely to hit medium-sized businesses and government agencies hardest,” Sevilla told Al Jazeera.

“Historically, they weren’t valuable enough targets for dedicated campaigns and often underinvested in cybersecurity, but AI makes them profitable targets. I expect many of these organisations to adapt by hiring cybersecurity specialists, launching vulnerability-reward programmes, and using AI to detect and patch weaknesses internally.”

While many analysts have expressed their desire for more information from Anthropic, some have been dismissive of its claims.

After United States Senator Chris Murphy warned that AI-led attacks would “destroy us” if regulation did not become a priority, Meta AI chief scientist Yann LeCun called out the lawmaker for being “played” by a company seeking regulatory capture.

“They are scaring everyone with dubious studies so that open source models are regulated out of existence,” LeCun said in a post on X.

Anthropic did not respond to a request for comment.

A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington, DC, said China “consistently and resolutely” opposed all forms of cyberattacks.

“We hope that relevant parties will adopt a professional and responsible attitude, basing their characterisation of cyber incidents on sufficient evidence, rather than unfounded speculation and accusations,” Liu Pengyu told Al Jazeera.

Toby Murray, computer security expert at the University of Melbourne, said that Anthropic had business incentives to highlight both the dangers of such attacks and its ability to counter them.

“Some people have questioned Anthropic’s claims that suggest that the attackers were able to get Claude AI to perform highly complex tasks with less human oversight than is typically required,” Murray told Al Jazeera.

“Unfortunately, they don’t give us hard evidence to say exactly what tasks were performed or what oversight was provided. So it’s difficult to pass judgement one way or the other on these claims.”

Still, Murray said he did not find the report particularly surprising, considering how effective some AI assistants are at tasks such as coding.

“I don’t see AI-powered hacking changing the kinds of hacks that will occur,” he said.

“However, it might usher in a change of scale. We should expect to see more AI-powered hacks in the future, and for those hacks to become more successful.”

While AI is set to pose growing risks to cybersecurity, it will also be pivotal in bolstering defences, analysts say.

Fred Heiding, a Harvard University research fellow who specialises in computer security and AI security, said he believes AI will provide a “significant advantage” to cybersecurity specialists in the long term.

“Today, many cyber-operations are held back by a shortage of human cyber-professionals. AI will help us overcome this bottleneck by enabling us to test all our systems at scale,” Heiding told Al Jazeera.

Heiding, who described Anthropic’s account as broadly credible but “overstated”, said the big danger is that hackers will have a window of opportunity to run amok as security experts struggle to catch up with their exploitation of increasingly advanced AI.

“Unfortunately, the defensive community is likely to be too slow to implement the new technology into automated security testing and patching solutions,” he said.

“If that is the case, attackers will wreak havoc on our systems with the press of a button, before our defences have had time to catch up.”