20.1 C
New York
Wednesday, September 17, 2025
Home Blog Page 7

Transfers and Graduates Impact Florida Women’s College Team in 2026

0

By Madeline Folsom on SwimSwam

It’s that time of the year again. SwimSwam will be previewing the top 12 men’s and women’s teams (and then some) from the 2025 NCAA Championships. Follow along with the College Swimming Preview Channel. Want to read even more? Check out the latest edition of the SwimSwam magazine.

Women’s #6: Florida Gators

Key Losses: Bella Sims (34 NCAA Points, 4 NCAA Relays), Emma Weyant (19 NCAA Points, 1 NCAA Relay), Mabel Zavaros (17 NCAA Points), Olivia Peoples (11 NCAA Points, 3 NCAA Relays), Micayla Cronk (4 NCAA Relays)

Key Additions: #6 Grace Rabb (TX – back/IM) #9 Lilla Bognar (SC – IM/back), HM Lynsey Bowen (IN – free), BOTR Zuri Ferguson (MA – back), Maria Fernanda Garcia (Mexico – diver), Alexa Fung (Canada – diver), Beatriz Bezerra (Brazil — fly/free), Sylvia Statkevicius (Lithuania — free)

GRADING CRITERIA

Over the years, we’ve gone back and forth on how to project points, ranging from largely subjective rankings to more data-based grading criteria based on ‘projected returning points.’ We like being as objective as possible, but we’re going to stick with the approach we’ve adopted post-COVID. The “stars” will rely heavily on what swimmers actually did last year, but we’ll also give credit to returning swimmers or freshmen who have posted times that would have scored last year.

Since we only profile the top 12 teams in this format, our grades are designed with that range in mind. In the grand scheme of college swimming and compared to all other college programs, top 12 NCAA programs would pretty much all grade well across the board. But in the interest of making these previews informative, our grading scale is tough – designed to show the tiers between the good stroke groups, the great ones, and the 2015 Texas fly group types.

  • 5 star (★★★★★) – a rare, elite NCAA group projected to score 25+ points per event
  • 4 star (★★★★) – a very, very good NCAA group projected to score 15-24 points per event
  • 3 star (★★★) – a good NCAA group projected to score 5-14 points per event
  • 2 star (★★) – a solid NCAA group projected to score 1-4 points per event
  • 1 star (★) –  an NCAA group that is projected to score no points per event, though that doesn’t mean it’s without potential scorers – they’ll just need to leapfrog some swimmers ahead of them to do it

We’ll grade each event discipline: sprint free (which we define to include all the relay-distance freestyle events, so 50, 100 and 200), distance free, IM, breaststroke, backstroke, butterfly and diving. Use these grades as a jumping-off point for discussion, rather than a reason to be angry.

Also, keep in mind that we are publishing many of these previews before teams have posted finalized rosters. We’re making our assessments based on the best information we have available at the time of publication, but we reserve the right to make changes after publication based on any new information that may emerge regarding rosters. If that does happen, we’ll make certain to note the change

2024-25 Season Review

The Gators dropped in the SEC and NCAA standings last season, though their drop at the conference championships was a result of Texas joining the SEC.

Florida finished 6th at the 2025 NCAA Championships with 232 points thanks to an exceptional performance from Bella Sims and double-digit points from Emma Weyant, Mabel Zavaros, Julie Brousseau, and Olivia Peoples.

Sims brought in two second-place finishes in the backstroke events to rack up 34 points in her sophomore season for the Gators. This was slightly off the 56 points she brought in the year before, but she still scored 15 more points than anyone else on the roster.

Senior Weyant brought in 19 points with her 2nd-place finish in the 400 IM and 15th-place finish in the 1650 free. She was joined in the double-digit point club by fifth-year Mabel Zavaros, who scored 17 points with her 13th-place finish in the 500 free and her 6th-place finish in the 400 IM.

Julie Brousseau, a freshman, and Olivia Peoples, another senior, also brought in more than 10 points at 12 and 11, respectively. Brousseau was the only Florida swimmer to score in all three of her events, finishing 10th in the 500 free, 13th in the 400 IM, and 16th in the 1650 free. Peoples, on the other hand, only scored in one, but she brought in 11 points with her 8th place finish in the 100 fly.

They also saw points come in from freshman Anita Bottazzo (9), sophomore Catie Choate (7), sophomore Michaela Mattes (6), freshman Addison Reese (4), and sophomore Lainy Kruger (3).

The Gators also had some very strong relay performances, finishing top three in the 800 freestyle and 400 medley relays and top 10 in the 400 free and 200 medley. The only relay they didn’t score any points in was the 200 freestyle relay, which they have historically struggled with. They had a stronger showing at the SEC Championships, scoring 1,179 points to finish just nine points ahead of Tennessee, which went on to outscore them by more than 60 points at NCAAs.

Sims and Weyant were at the top of the point leaderboard at the SEC Championships as well, scoring 91 and 82 points, respectively, but they were joined by more than 80 points by sophomore diver Camyla Monroy, who scored 80 points in the diving events.

Sprint Freestyle: ★

Florida has historically struggled in the sprint freestyle events. They did not have a single athlete in the 50 or 100 freestyle events at the 2025 NCAA Championships, and the 200 freestyle relay was the only relay in which they did not score points.

Their fastest 50 and 100 freestyler from last season was Bella Sims, and she transferred to Michigan, leaving Addison Reese as the fastest returning sprinter at 22.39 and 48.48, respectively. Neither of these swims is under the NCAA cutline, and Reese focuses on the butterfly events, and would need to see significant drops to score points.

They picked up two international sprint freshmen in Beatriz Bezerra and Sylvia Statkevicius. Bezerra’s LC times convert to 22.26 and 49.21, and Statkevicius comes in slightly slower in the 50 at 22.53, but faster in the 100 at 48.69. None of these swims are under the cutlines of 22.01 and 48.11, but they will be helpful on the sprint relays. Statkevicius also has a 200 freestyle time that converts to 1:45.20, which is about half a second over the 1:44.74 cutline.

The 200 free is the only place they are returning any NCAA scorers from last season, with current junior Lainy Kruger bringing in three points at the 2025 NCAA Championships with her 14th-place finish in the 200. They also have Julie Brousseau, who scored 12 points at NCAAs, coming in under the cutline with her 1:44.18. She did not swim the event last season, competing in the 400 IM instead, where she finished 13th. It seems likely she will make this decision again, but if she chooses to swim the 200, she could be a ‘B’ finalist.

JoJo Ramey also swam the 200 freestyle at NCAAs, finishing 49th in 1:48.05, but her lifetime best in the event would have been 20th. While this is still outside of scoring position, a half-second drop could get her in the ‘B’ final.

Incoming freshman Lynsey Bowen will be another potential swimmer in the 200 freestyle with her best time sitting at 1:45.30, about half a second over the cutline. She hasn’t dropped in the event since 2022, though, and would need a very strong swim to find herself in scoring position.

Distance Freestyle: ★★★

This group received five stars last season, and even though Bella Sims and Emma Weyant will not be returning, the group is still one of their strongest.

Brousseau was their highest finishing swimmer in the 500 last season, touching 10th at the NCAA Championships, and she will be back in the event this year along with Michaela Mattes, who was 45th.

Bowen has a best time of 4:39.51 in the event, which would be just a tenth back of the NCAA cutline in the event, but again, she hasn’t dropped in the event since December of 2023, and she would need to get a full second faster if she wants to beat the 16th-place time from the prelims of 4:38.76.

In the 1650, they have Mattes and Brousseau both returning as NCAA scorers, having finished 11th and 16th last season, respectively, in the event to total seven points for the Gators.

Backstroke: ★★

The Gators saw Bella Sims score 34 points in the backstroke events last season with her 2nd place finish in both the 100 and 200, and they will be hurting with her transfer. They did pick up a few strong freshmen, and they have some of their top backstrokers returning.

Catie Choate is their top returning backstroker, having scored seven points with her 10th-place finish in the 200 backstroke. She did not score in the 100 backstroke, finishing 24th overall, and her best time of 51.54 would still have sat just outside of scoring position at 22nd. She sits just three tenths out of scoring position with 16th place in prelims coming in at 51.20.

Zoe Dixon and JoJo Ramey also swam the 200 backstroke at NCAAs, finishing 26th and 29th, respectively. Both added from their lifetime bests in the event, but their best times would have still been outside scoring position, with Ramey coming the closest with her 1:52.02, which would have been 17th.

Incoming freshman Grace Rabb was their highest-ranked recruit and will bolster the backstroke group as well with her time of 1:52.13, placing her just outside of NCAA scoring in the event. Her 100 backstroke of 52.09 is just over the NCAA cutline of 51.68, but a four-tenth drop isn’t unheard of for a college freshman.

Also joining the backstroke group are Zuri Ferguson, who has times of 52.65 and 1:53.31, and Lilla Bognar, who has been 53.28 and 1:53.29. Ferguson’s 200 backstroke time exactly ties the NCAA cutline in the event, and would make her the potential fifth Gator in the event at this season’s NCAAs. Bognar is not quite as fast in the 100, but her 200 backstroke comes in under the NCAA cutline, and will likely be one of her three events. However, Bognar has not swum a meet in 2025, so we don’t know where her times will be.

Breaststroke: ★★★

Anita Bottazzo was the top breaststroker for the Gators last year, with her best time of 57.49 in the 100 breast ranking her 6th in the NCAA last season. She ended up finishing 9th at the 2025 NCAA Championships after she swam 58.44 in the prelims. Her time in the ‘B’ final (57.84) would have been 4th overall and scored 15 points for the team.

Bottazzo also swam the 200 breast, finishing 20th in prelims. Her best time of 2:08.66 would have been one spot out of finals position at 17th overall, just a tenth behind Letitia Sim’s 2:08.56.

She will be joined by Molly Mayne, who was 37th in the 100 breaststroke and scratched out of the 200 breaststroke after being seeded 25th overall. Her best time in the 200 of 2:08.50 would have been 15th in prelims and finals of the event, scoring two points.

Sofia Plaza was another 200 breaststroker, finishing 41st at the 2025 NCAAs in 2:11.64. Her lifetime best in the event of 2:10.17 was about half a second over the NCAA cutline, but she qualified in the 400 IM.

Butterfly: ★★

Florida graduated their top butterfly swimmer, Olivia Peoples, last season after she scored 11 points in the 100 with her 8th place finish at NCAAs. They will return Addison Reese, who brought in four points with her 13th-place finish in the 200 fly. Reese also finished 39th in the 100 fly at 52.30, just a hundredth off the 52.29 mark she set at the SEC Championships.

Lainy Kruger is another potential finalist in the 200 fly after she finished 24th last year. It took 1:54.16 in prelims to qualify for the final, which is about a second faster than Kruger’s best of 1:55.08.

Incoming freshman Beatriz Bezerra will also make an impact in the fly events. Her 100 fly time of 58.99 converts to 52.80, which would have been 3rd on the team last season, behind Reese and Peoples. It is about a second over the NCAA cutline of 51.87, but she will likely be a conference scorer.

Reese is their only seeded scorer at the moment. Kruger or Bezerra could find their way into potential ‘B’ finals swims, but they would need to drop some significant time.

IM: ★★★½

Florida has a deep medley group, and despite losing their top IMer in Emma Weyant, they will still have a significant number of swimmers in the IM events. At last season’s NCAAs, they had six athletes in the 400 IM and four in the 200 IM.

Brousseau will, yet again, be a major swimmer for the Gators, especially in the 400 IM, where she is their top returning swimmer after she finished 13th in the 400 IM at NCAAs. She is a potential ‘A’ finalist in the event, after she was slightly off at the NCAA Championships.

She touched in 4:05.83 in the final to come in just behind Princeton’s Eleanor Sun, but her lifetime best stands at 4:04.21, which she swam to finish 5th at SECs. That time would have qualified her 7th for the final, where she would have finished 8th, bringing in 11 points.

Brousseau will probably not swim the 200 IM as she is a ‘B’ finalist in the 500 freestyle, and she does not have a SCY time in the event since she never swam it last season.

Zoe Dixon was actually one of the fastest IMers on the Florida team last year, but she struggled last season. At the 2024 NCAA Championships, she finished 8th in the 200 IM and 7th in the 400 IM. At the 2025 NCAA Championships, she finished 17th in the 200 IM, touching in 1:55.59 to add about two seconds from her best of 1:53.73, and 20th in the 400 IM, swimming 4:08.59 to add five seconds from her lifetime best of 4:03.33. If she is able to get back down to her swims from 2024 this year, she is a potential ‘A’ finalist in both events.

Sofia Plaza and Michaela Mattes also swam the 400 IM at the NCAA Championships, finishing 24th and 40th, respectively. Plaza’s lifetime best of 4:07.23 would have qualified for the ‘B’ final in 16th overall, and makes her a potential scorer if she is able to replicate that swim.

Lainy Kruger and Molly Mayne were both entered in the 200 IM. Kruger finished 23rd in 1:56.13, a two-second add from the 1:54.08 mark she set at the SEC Championships, which would make her a ‘B’ finalist. Mayne no-showed the event, but her lifetime best of 1:57.69 would not have earned a finals swim.

The Gators are also bringing in freshmen IMers in the form of Grace Rabb and Lilla Bognar to each take one of the IMs. Rabb is coming in at 1:55.64 in the 200 IM, which would have been 18th in prelims at NCAAs, and Bognar’s time of 4:05.50 from 2022 would have comfortably made the ‘B’ final.

The IM group is deep, but it isn’t exceptionally fast, with only one athlete who scored last year returning. They have the potential to score a lot of points, though, if the athletes are in top form.

Diving: ★★★

The diving events are where Florida has the most potential for improvement. Last year, the Gators scored zero points at the NCAA Championships, despite their third-highest point scorer from SECs being a diver.

Camyla Monroy scored 80 points after winning the 1-meter and placing 6th on the 3-meter and platform. In 2024, she finished 7th on the 1-meter springboard, and clearly maintained that skill with her win at SECs last season. If she is able to perform at NCAAs, she is a potential three-event scorer. Last season, she narrowly missed out on platform (17th) and the 1-meter event (19th).

They are also bringing in three freshmen divers, including Alexa Fung and Maria Fernanda Garcia. Both athletes have international experience, with Fung winning the gold medal in the 1-meter springboard event in 2022 and Fernanda Garcia finishing 12th in the 3-meter and 15th in the 1-meter at the World Championships in Singapore. Both women could come in as NCAA point scorers.

Relays: ★★★

Relays are one of the places where Florida will struggle the most with the loss of Bella Sims. The only relay she did not swim on last year finished 23rd and brought in zero points for the team. Their freshmen will help some, but it is nearly impossible to replace Sims.

They are also having to replace four-relay swimmer Micayla Cronk, who graduated after last season, and was a cornerstone of the Gators’ relays.

Here is how the relays looked last year:

Relay 2025 NCAA Result (Time) Lineup Losing Potential Adds  Season-Best Time
200 FR 23rd (1:28.88) Reese, Choate, Peoples, Cronk Peoples, Cronk Bezerra, Statkevicius 1:28.24 (Sims, Cronk, Peoples, Reese)
400 FR 9th (3:10.82) Sims, Reese, Kruger, Cronk Sims, Cronk Bezerra, Statkevicius Same
800 FR 3rd (6:53.41) Sims, Brousseau, Weyant, Kruger Sims, Weyant Bognar, Statkevicius, Bowen Same
200 MR 5th (1:33.92) Sims, Bottazzo, Peoples, Cronk Sims, Peoples, Cronk Bezerra, Statkevicius, Rabb, Ferguson Same
400 MR 3rd (3:25.18) Sims, Bottazzo, Peoples, Cronk Sims, Peoples, Cronk Bezerra, Statkevicius, Rabb, Ferguson 3:25.78 (same order)

All the Florida relays are losing at least one athlete, though in many cases, there are swimmers coming up who are able to fill empty spaces. Addison Reese only swam two relays at last year’s NCAA Championships, but she will likely be on four this year, swimming the freestyle leg on both medleys as well as on both freestyle relays. Bezerra and Statkevicius are both coming in as well, with times that convert to faster than or right around the splits from last year’s 200 free relay.

The 800 freestyle relay will also probably be okay, though they will struggle to replace Sims’ 1:42.55 from a flat start to lead off the relay. They could still end up in the top 10 with Bognar, Statkevicius, and Bowen all having times in the 1:45 to 1:46 range—though they’ll all need to step up and split sub-1:45.

Bezerra and Statkevicius could both swim on four relays as freshmen, with Bezerra taking over fly legs on the medley and Statkevicius swimming the 200 free, 400 free, and 800 free relays at a minimum.

The medleys are where the Gators will see the most turnover, with three of the four athletes on both relays not returning this year. Rabb and Ferguson are both potential options to take over the backstroke legs, with Ferguson being slightly more likely on the 200 medley and Rabb more likely on the 400 medley. Neither will be able to match Sims’ splits, but they have slightly more help on the back ends.

The freestyle and butterfly legs will be split in some combination between Bezerra, Reese, and Statkevicius, with Bezerra and Reese seeming as the likely fly/free combination right now. Micayla Cronk split 47.63 to come home on the 400 medley last year, with Peoples splitting 50.65 on the fly leg. Reese was 48.61 on the 400 free relay, but her best time of 48.48 from a flat start lends to the idea that she can be faster there. Bezerra comes in with a conversion more than two seconds back of Peoples in 52.80. While they probably won’t finish in the top 3 again, they have five seconds of cushion to remain in the top 10.

The Gators will have a hard time finishing in the top three, like they did twice last year, but they have the potential to still end up in the top 10 for most of the relays.

Total Stars: 20.5/40

2025/26 Outlook

The Florida women are in a tough spot this year, though a very strong recruiting class and some talented returning swimmers will help them as they try to maintain their spot in the NCAA’s top 10 (despite being just two years removed from placed 3rd in 2024).

Returners like Addison Reese, Lainy Kruger, and Julie Brousseau will be crucial in scoring points for the Gators, while the freshmen will come in with major relay duties from the outset. The divers will also need to be exceptional and bring in a significant number of points.

Bella Sims is an incredibly talented swimmer and a very difficult one to try to replace, especially with her wide-ranging abilities and ability to contribute in so many areas. There isn’t one individual swimmer who can take over her duties or make up for the loss of her points, but multiple swimmers could step up to the plate and take pieces.

As far as the SEC goes, the Gators were 2nd last year in a very close race with Tennessee, coming out on top by just nine points. The top three teams were far ahead of the rest of the conference, but Tennessee could overtake them this year, depending on both teams and their freshmen contingents.

WOMEN’S 2025-26 COLLEGE PREVIEW INDEX

RANK (2024) TEAM SPRINT FREE DISTANCE FREE BACK BREAST FLY IM DIVING RELAY TOTAL
1
Virginia Cavaliers
2
Stanford Cardinal
3
Texas Longhorns
4
Indiana Hoosiers
5
Tennessee Volunteers
6 Florida Gators ★★★ ★★ ★★★ ★★ ★★★½ ★★★ ★★★ 20.5/40
7 Louisville Cardinals ★★★★ ★★ ★★½ ★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★★★ 22.5/40
8 Cal Golden Bears ★★★½ ★★★★ ★★★½ ★★★ ★★★★ ★★½ ★★★★ 25.5/40
9 Michigan Wolverines ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★½ ★★★★★ 26.5/40
10 NC State Wolfpack ★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★ ★★ ★★★★ 23/40
11 USC Trojans ★★★★ ★★★ ★½ ★★★½ ★★ ★★★ 19/40
12 Wisconsin Badgers ★★ ★★½ ★★ ★★ 12.5/40

Read the full story on SwimSwam: 2026 College Previews: #6 Florida Women Hit Hard By Transfers and Graduates

Spotify eliminates shuffle limitation for free tier users

0

Spotify just announced a major upgrade to the on-demand playback controls available on the free version of its app.

The first in a trio of updates allows mobile ad-supported users to ‘pick and play‘ specific tracks in any playlist, and on any album track list.

The change, which rolls out globally today (September 15), marks a significant shift from the platform’s longstanding shuffle-only model for free users.

Spotify has added two other on-demand features for free users:

  • Search & Play: Free users can search for individual songs and play them on-demand.
  • Share & Play: Tracks shared by friends in a message, or artists via social media, can be played on mobile immediately (previously only available on desktop or tablet).

The streaming giant hopes that a more generous free tier will increase engagement, boost ad revenues, help retain free users, and ultimately convert those ad-supported users to Premium subscribers.

The freemium enhancements arrive alongside Spotify’s recent Premium upgrades, including a playlist mixing tool and the launch of lossless audio for paid subscribers – but not as part of a rumored higher-priced “superpremium” or “Music Pro” tier as suggested in reports earlier this year.

Spotify also launched a direct message feature inside its app for both Free and Premium users last month.

These free and premium updates raise questions about what this all means for Spotify’s long-awaited ‘Super Premium’ service and whether any of these tools could one day become ‘Super Premium’ perks.

“Together with our industry partners, we still have a job to do to come up with more interesting and exciting products that we could layer on top of the current subscription landscape,” said Gustav Gyllenhammar, VP of Markets and Subscriptions at Spotify, commenting on the platform’s subscription tier roadmap.

“But we have no news to share just now about what those products would be,” he added, speaking exclusively with Music Business Worldwide.

“Together with our industry partners, we still have a job to do to come up with more interesting and exciting products that we could layer on top of the current subscription landscape.”

 Gustav Gyllenhammar, Spotify 

The higher-priced subscription concept has been tested in China by Tencent Music Entertainment, whose Super VIP tier recently surpassed 15 million subscribers. These SVIP users generate five times the revenue of regular subscribers.

Bloomberg reported in February that Spotify was considering charging up to $5.99 more per month on top of a Premium subscription for access to a so-called ‘Music Pro’ tier, which would include various ‘superfan‘ perks.

An individual Spotify Premium subscription is currently priced at $11.99 in the US, following the most recent price rise in June 2024. This would bring the combined cost of a Premium subscription plus the Music Pro add-on to around $18 per month.

Spotify’s freemium “Glow up” (in Gyllenhammar’s words) comes as the platform faces intensified competition from platforms like YouTube and TikTok for younger audiences.

Gyllenhammar explained that the decision to give more on-demand control to free users was in part driven by Gen Z user behavior, which showed retention challenges with the existing free mobile experience.

“Young users felt like the old Spotify free experience on mobile was almost broken,” he said. “They tried to tap on things, and it didn’t work. The behavior that young users have in their media consumption models today – they really expect this to work.”

He added: “Obviously we saw retention challenges with an experience that is not living up to users’ needs.”

“Young users felt like the old Spotify free experience on mobile was almost broken.”

Gustav Gyllenhammar, Spotify

The Search & Play feature in particular fundamentally changes the free user experience from passive consumption to active discovery.

Users can now search for and instantly play any specific song they hear about via TikTok, word of mouth etc.

“Maybe our friend Ed Sheeran releases a new song today, and he has some new songs that you’ve heard about. You can search for the song name, and you can play that song,” said Gyllenhammar.

With the Share & Play feature, Spotify seeks to address what it says was a user frustration with the previous version of the free app.

Mobile ad-supported users weren’t able to tap and immediately play a track shared with them via a private messaging app (or Spotify’s new DM service), or through an artist’s social channels.

Spotify is keen to highlight how today’s update addresses that latter point.

“Artists who now share links on social can be reassured that everyone on Spotify, Free or Premium, will be able to listen,” the company said in a statement.


While more on-demand access is being introduced, Gyllenhammar confirmed there are still limitations on usage, though he declined to specify the exact number of daily on-demand minutes available to free users.

A spokesperson for Spotify confirmed “on-demand time is calculated as the time a user spends listening to music that has started playing due to an ‘on-demand’ action, either Pick & Play or Skipping”.

They added: “Though this update provides more control to listeners on free, there is still a limit to on-demand skips. Only Spotify Premium users have complete control to play and skip music without restrictions.” (Skipping for free users of the app was previously limited to six an hour).

The move represents a carefully calculated risk for Spotify, whose premium subscriptions generate 90% of the company’s revenue.

Gyllenhammar emphasized that 60% of premium subscribers start on the free tier, making free user engagement crucial for long-term growth.

“By opening up and widening the experience on free, we’re able to accelerate growth of our free tier, both from a number of users as well as engagement,” he said.

According to Gyllenhammar, testing across multiple emerging markets over 18 months prior to the global roll-out showed positive impacts on both free user retention and premium conversion rates.

Spotify’s global Premium Subscriber base at the close of Q2 reached 276 million paying users, which was up by +8 million net subs on the 268 million that the firm counted at the end of the prior quarter (Q1 2025).

Spotify’s total Monthly Active Users, which combine paying users and ad-supported users, grew 11% year over year to 696 million, up +18 million MAUs from the 678 million reported for the prior quarter (Q1 2025).



Gyllenhammar also highlighted the potential benefits of the new freemium functionality for the company’s ads business.

“With increased free engagement and increased free audience, as well as more time spent on platform for free users, and also more focused time spent for free users – because if you can go in and pick your songs and so on, it means that it’s a boon for our advertising business,” he said.

He added: “We can now have much higher-performing advertising units for our users. So we feel strongly that this should be something that can drive accelerated profitability and revenue generation on the free tier from advertisers. That’s another part of why this move is important for us.”

Spotify’s Ad-Supported Revenue in Q2 2025 was €453 million ($514m), up 5% YoY on a constant currency basis, reflecting growth across music and podcast advertising.


Today’s update marks the biggest adjustment to Spotify’s free tier in nearly six years.

The company rolled out more on-demand elements for ad-supported users in 2018, including the ability to select individual tracks in up to 15 different playlists such as Discover Weekly, Rap Caviar and Today’s Top Hits.

The ‘pick and play‘ addition announced today lets users of the ad-supported version of the app choose and play specific tracks in any playlist, and on any album track list.Music Business Worldwide

Kodak Charmera camera provides a fun and retro charm.

0

Kodak’s latest camera is an adorable little package of whimsy that can also make for a thoughtful gift. The Charmera is truly small enough to serve as a keychain, can shoot digital photos and video, and is mighty affordable at just $30 a pop.

Weighing just over 1 oz (30 g) and about the size of a film roll, the tiny Charmera features a viewfinder, an LCD screen, a Type-C port for charging and transferring your shots, a flash, and a microSD card slot for up to 128 GB of storage.

It shoots 1.6-megapixel JPEG photos at 1,440 x 1,440 resolution, and 30-fps video in AVI format. Don’t expect stellar output from the 1/4-inch-type CMOS sensor and 35-mm f/2.4 lens: this is made for lo-fi results that hark back to Kodak’s super-compact Fling camera from the 80s.

The bold yellow Charmera is a beauty, but I’m drawn to the translucent Secret Edition that’s harder to get

Kodak

In fact, it includes a small selection of photo filters and photo frames to apply to your shots and give even more of a retro look. They handily appear on screen as overlays to give you a preview as you compose your shot.

The Charmera is pretty functional for its size, with a viewfinder, LCD preview screen, and a flash
The Charmera is pretty functional for its size, with a viewfinder, LCD preview screen, and a flash

Kodak

There are seven different colorways inspired by Kodak’s design language from the late 80s to collect. You can either purchase an individual blind box for US$30 – which means you won’t know which colorway is inside until you receive and open it – or you can pick up a set of six. Good luck getting the ‘secret edition’ with a transparent case though, which has a lower chance of randomly being included in your order.

Naturally, you’ll be able to get higher fidelity images out of the camera in your phone than with this. But if you’ve ever used an instant or disposable camera, you’ll know that there’s something special about shooting with an imperfect device built for capturing fun moments. And if you’re a fan of the brand, there are a lot of design elements and details – including a photo border that resembles old photo editing software – in the Charmera package to nerd out on.

The Charmera is hands down the cutest camera of 2025
The Charmera is hands down the cutest camera of 2025

Kodak

Find the Charmera on Kodak’s Reto Pro site; it’s currently sold out but is expected to be restocked soon.

Product page: Kodak

Insights into Tyler Robinson’s Motives in Charlie Kirk Killing | Crime News

0

Conservative activist and social media personality Charlie Kirk was fatally shot during an event at Utah Valley University in the United States on Wednesday.

After more than a two-day manhunt, authorities arrested and named 22-year-old Utah resident Tyler Robinson as the suspect in Kirk’s shooting.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

While naming Robinson, authorities said a motive was unknown. Since then, however, politicians and posts on social media platforms have speculated about what might have driven Robinson to allegedly shoot Kirk.

Here is what we know so far about Robinson and potential motives:

Who shot Kirk – and was he a Republican or a Democrat?

On Friday, Utah Governor Spencer Cox named Robinson as the person suspected of fatally shooting Kirk.

Robinson is a third-year student in the electrical apprenticeship programme at Dixie Technical College in St George, Utah.

State records from Utah showed that Robinson is a registered voter in the state, but he is not affiliated with any political party. He did not vote in the two most recent general elections when he was of voting age.

At the beginning of the hunt for Kirk’s shooter, Utah’s Department of Public Safety released grainy surveillance camera photos of a white man wearing Converse trainers, jeans, a long-sleeved black T-shirt with a US flag and eagle on it, and a black baseball cap with a triangle.

Robinson’s family: What do we know about their politics?

Robinson’s listed address is his parents’ home near St George, about a 3.5-hour drive from Utah Valley University. Robinson’s parents are both registered Republicans.

Other family members have spoken in news interviews about how the extended family too is Republican. On social media platforms, some of Robinson’s photos show him holding guns.

But in an affidavit filed by prosecutors against Robinson after his arrest, they said a family member had told them that he had “become more political in recent years”.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Special Agent Robert Bohls described Robinson’s weapon as “a high-powered, bolt-action rifle”.

According to the affidavit filed by prosecutors against Robinson on Friday, investigators found a .30-06-calibre, bolt-action Mauser Model 98 rifle wrapped in a dark coloured towel allegedly discarded by Robinson.

What drove Robinson to shoot Kirk, according to prosecutors?

While prosecutors have not spelled out a motive for Robinson’s alleged act, their affidavit details conversations with the family member who referred to the suspect’s increasingly political turn and to Robinson’s flatmate.

According to the affidavit, one of Kirk’s family members told investigators that Robinson had visited for a family dinner before the shooting. While talking to another family member, Robinson had talked about his dislike for Kirk.

The other family member also echoed Robinson’s dislike, and both individuals said they did not like Kirk’s viewpoints. The family member also said Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate.

What has Utah’s governor said about Robinson’s possible motivations?

Cox, a Republican, told The Wall Street Journal that Robinson was “deeply indoctrinated with leftist ideology“.

Cox referenced cryptic messages that prosecutors said were engraved on shell casings recovered with the rifle allegedly used in Kirk’s shooting.

According to the affidavit, one fired casing read: “Notices, bulges OWO what’s this?”

Three unfired shell casings also had messages. They read: “hey fascist! CATCH!” with an up arrow symbol, right arrow symbol and three down arrow symbols; a reference to an antifascist Italian folk song, “O Bella ciao, Bella ciao, Bella ciao, Ciao, ciao!”; and “If you read This, you are GAY Lmao.”

Cox also referenced the sexual identity of Robinson’s flatmate and partner, who the governor said had been cooperating with investigators.

In an interview with CNN, Cox said Robinson’s roommate was transgender, “a male transitioning to female”, who was romantically involved with Robinson.

The Utah governor said that unlike the suspect’s family and flatmate, Robinson himself was “not cooperating” with the investigation.

What else do we know?

According to the affidavit, Robinson’s roommate revealed electronic messages that Robinson sent that could provide more clues about the suspected shooter’s motive.

In the messages, the sender, named “Tyler”, said he had left a rifle in a bush and had to retrieve it. “Tyler” also wrote that he wrapped the rifle in a towel. The messages also talk about engraving bullets.

Challenging Client

0



Client Challenge



JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

Conor McGregor withdraws from Irish presidential election race

0

Mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor has said he is no longer seeking to run in next month’s Irish presidential election.

His announcement on Monday came hours before he was due to address meetings of Dublin City Council and Kildare County Council, where he was seeking to secure the nominations needed for his name to be on the ballot.

In a post on social media, McGregor said the decision to withdraw his name had come “following careful reflection, and after consulting with my family”.

Ireland will head to the polls on 24 October, with three candidates so far having secured the backing needed from Irish lawmakers or local authorities to stand in the race.

Presidential hopefuls must be an Irish citizen aged 35 or older, and require the endorsement of at least 20 members of the Irish parliament, the Oireachtas, or four out of Ireland’s 31 local authorities.

McGregor, a former champion fighter who has not competed professionally since July 2021, said: “This was not an easy decision, but it is the right one at this moment in time.”

The 37-year-old, who first vowed to run for the presidency last year, said he was “truly humbled” by the “support and encouragement” he received.

He said the election’s eligibility rules were a “straitjacket” that prevented “a true democratic presidential election being contested”.

Earlier this year, McGregor lost a civil jury appeal against a finding that he had sexually assaulted a woman, which he denied.

Nikita Hand accused McGregor of raping her in a hotel in Dublin in 2018. In November 2024, she won her claim against him for damages in a civil case.

McGregor was ordered to pay £206,000 in damages plus costs to Ms Hand.

Prospective presidential candidates have until 24 September to secure the backing needed to make it onto the ballot, with three so far having done so.

Catherine Connolly is an independent who is backed by some left-wing parties – Labour, the Social Democrats, and People Before Profit.

Jim Gavin has been selected by Fianna Fáil, which is the largest party in the Irish parliament and led by the Taoiseach Micheál Martin.

Heather Humphreys is the candidate for Fine Gael, a centre-right party which is currently in coalition government with Fianna Fáil.

Record low inflation expectations seen in South Africa’s long-term outlook

0

South Africa’s longer-term inflation expectations drop to record low

Climate change exacerbates major fire ripping through homes in Manila captured in aerial video

0

NewsFeed

Aerial video from the Philippines shows dozens of shanty homes burning in the Tondo area of Manila, where a fire displaced more than 1,100 families. Fire crews worked through Saturday night before declaring the blaze under control in the early hours of Sunday.

ANZ hit with record $160 million fine by Australia’s financial regulator

0

Australia’s ANZ, one of the country’s “big four” banks, has agreed to pay a record fine of $240 million Australian dollars ($159.5 million) over “widespread misconduct”, the financial regulator said Monday.

The fine is the largest ever announced by the regulator against a single entity, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said.

ANZ was fined for “acting unconscionably” while managing a $14-billion bond deal with the Australian government.

It was also penalized for “failing to respond to hundreds of customer hardship notices”, making false or misleading statements about its savings interest rates and failing to refund fees charged to dead customers.

“Time and time again ANZ betrayed the trust of Australians,” Joe Longo, chair of the ASIC, said.

“Banks must have the trust of customers and government. This outcome shows an unacceptable disregard for that trust that is critical to the banking system.”

ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court said: “As one of Australia’s biggest banks, customers trusted ANZ to do the right thing but, even on the basics like paying the correct interest rate, it fell short.”

Embattled ANZ, one of four banks that dominate Australia’s financial services industry, announced last week it would cut over 3,500 staff by September next year, part of a restructuring plan it said would cost over $500 million Australian dollars.

ANZ chairman Paul O’Sullivan confirmed that the bank had agreed to the fines, saying “the reality is we made mistakes that have had a significant impact on customers”.

“On behalf of ANZ, I apologize and assure our customers we have taken the necessary action, including holding relevant executives accountable,” he said in a statement.

CEO Nuno Matos added: “The failings outlined are simply not good enough and they reinforce the case for change”.

Landmark climate report warns that 1.5 million Australians will be threatened by rising seas by 2050

0

EPA Three people ride two bikes in the coast in Australia with waves crashing in the backgroundEPA

Australians are already living with the consequences of climate change

One and a half million Australians living in coastal areas are at risk from rising sea levels by 2050, a landmark climate report has warned.

Australia’s first National Climate Risk Assessment predicted more frequent and severe climate hazards like floods, cyclones, heatwaves, droughts and bushfires.

“Australians are already living with the consequences of climate change today,” Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen said, “but it’s clear every degree of warming we prevent now will help future generations avoid the worst impacts in years to come.”

The report looked at three global warming scenarios – above 1.5C, above 2C and above 3C.

Australia – one of the world’s biggest polluters per capita – has already reached warming of above 1.5C, the report said, noting that at 3C, heat-related deaths in Sydney may rise by more than 400% and almost triple in Melbourne.

The 72-page report – released days before the government announces its emissions reduction targets for 2035 – found that no Australian community will be immune from climate risks that will be “cascading, compounding and concurrent”.

It warned of more heatwave-related deaths, poorer water quality due to severe flooding and bushfires, and property values to drop by A$611bn ($406bn; £300bn).

By 2050, the report found the number of coastal communities located in “high and very high risk areas” in Australia will increase and if populations levels remain at current levels, this will mean more than 1.5 million people will be at risk.

Areas in northern Australia, along with remote communities and outer suburbs of major cities, were particularly at risk, the report said.

“This will put pressure on health, critical infrastructure, natural species and ecosystems, and primary industries,” the report warned, as well as posing extra challenges for emergency responders.

The report also found that coral reefs such as the Great Barrier Reef in Queensland and Ningaloo Reef in Western Australia – both already hit by record bleaching events – will face higher risks of “bleaching and biodiversity loss” due to warmer oceans.

“One thing that is very clear from this climate assessment is that our whole country has a lot at stake,” Bowen said. “The cost of inaction will always outweigh the cost of action.”

In response to the report, the government released a national adaptation plan which detailed how federal, state and local governments can work together to tackle climate issues, according to Bowen.

“We will also set an ambitious and achievable 2035 target, informed by advice from the independent Climate Change Authority,” he said, referring to the body that provides advice on climate policy.

Australia has pledged to reduce emissions by 43% by 2030, but is criticised for its continued heavy reliance on fossil fuels.

Climate Council chief executive Amanda McKenzie said the report’s findings were terrifying and called on the government to commit to higher emissions cuts.

“Australia cannot afford a timid 2035 target when our own government data shows the catastrophic costs of inaction,” the head of the the non-profit said.

“The longer we delay the deep and sustained cuts to climate pollution we need, the harder it becomes to protect communities from escalating heatwaves, floods and bushfire weather.”