17.6 C
New York
Wednesday, September 17, 2025
Home Blog Page 6

US allegedly destroys Venezuelan drug boat, reportedly killing three

0

President Donald Trump says the US military has destroyed an alleged Venezuelan drug vessel travelling in international waters on the way to the US.

Trump said on Monday that three men were killed in the attack on “violent drug trafficking cartels”. He provided no evidence that the boat was carrying drugs.

Shortly before, his Venezuelan counterpart Nicolás Maduro said Caracas would defend itself against US “aggression”, calling America’s top diplomat Marco Rubio the “lord of death and war”.

Tensions between the two countries escalated after the US deployed warships to the southern Caribbean on what officials said were counter-narcotics operations, carrying out a strike which killed 11 people.

“This morning, on my orders, US military forces conducted a second kinetic strike against positively identified, extraordinarily violent drug trafficking cartels and narcoterrorists,” Trump said.

“These extremely violent drug trafficking cartels pose a threat to US national security.”

The post also included a nearly 30 second video, which appeared to show a vessel in a body of water exploding and then on fire.

Rubio had earlier on Monday defended the first attack on a boat said to be carrying drugs from Venezuela, which killed all 11 people on board, saying “what needs to start happening is some of these boats need to get blown up”.

During an interview on Fox News, the US secretary of state said Maduro represented “a direct threat to the national security” of the US due to his alleged involvement in drug trafficking.

Later on Monday, Maduro said that relations with the US had “been destroyed by their bomb threats”.

“We have moved from a period of battered relations to a completely broken one”.

The Venezuelan president said the government would “fully” exercise its “legitimate right to defend itself”.

Legal experts previously told the BBC that the fatal strike on the first vessel in international waters may have violated international human rights and maritime law.

Asked by a journalist on Sunday whether the US would now “start doing strikes on mainland Venezuela”, Trump answered: “We’ll see what happens.”

Speaking to reporters in New Jersey, the president said Venezuela was “sending us their gang members, their drug dealers and drugs”.

He said that maritime traffic in the Southern Caribbean had reduced significantly “since the first strike”.

Experts raised questions about the legality of the 2 September attack on the alleged drug boat, saying that it may have violated international law.

Venezuela responded by flying two F-16 fighter jets over a US Navy destroyer two days later.

That led Trump to warn that any Venezuelan jets putting “us in a dangerous situation” would be shot down.

After a brief lull, tensions rose again on Saturday when Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil accused US forces of boarding a Venezuelan vessel.

Gil said the vessel, which he described as a “small, harmless” fishing boat, was seized “illegally and hostilely” for eight hours.

In a statement, the Venezuelan foreign ministry alleged that those who ordered the seizure were “looking for an incident to justify escalating war in the Caribbean, with the aim of regime change” in Caracas.

The US, and many other nations including the UK, have not recognised the re-election of Maduro in July 2024, pointing to evidence gathered by the opposition with the help of independent observers showing that his rival, Edmundo González, had won the election by a landslide.

US officials have also accused Maduro of leading a drug cartel called the Cartel of the Suns and are offering a reward of $50m (£37m) for information leading to his capture.

Maduro has denied the allegations and has accused the US of an “imperialist move” to depose him.

He has called on Venezuelans to enlist in the militia, a force made up of civilians which in the past has been used mainly to boost numbers at political rallies and parades.

Public sector workers have reported being pressured into joining the militia.

Challenging Client

0



Client Challenge



JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

During his visit to Jerusalem, Rubio expresses doubts about Gaza deal.

0

new video loaded: Rubio Is Skeptical of Gaza Deal During Jerusalem Visit

transcript

transcript

Rubio Is Skeptical of Gaza Deal During Jerusalem Visit

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio cast doubt on the possibility of a diplomatic solution to the Gaza war after talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem.

I don’t know of anyone who would not rather see a negotiated settlement in which Hamas agrees to no longer be a terrorist group, lay down their arms, free the hostages, by the way — not just the hostages that they’re holding from Israel, but frankly, the people of Gaza that they’re also holding hostage as human shields. So that would be the ideal outcome, and one we would all like to see. It’s one that’s been worked on, but I think we have to be prepared for the fact that savage terrorists don’t normally agree to things like that. But we’ll continue to pursue that route. It’s the ideal outcome, but it may require ultimately a concise military operation to eliminate them.

S&P 500 and Nasdaq Reach All-Time Highs before Federal Reserve Meeting; Tesla Surges

0

S&P 500, Nasdaq hit record highs ahead of Fed meeting; Tesla jumps

Israel orders families to evacuate within minutes before demolishing tower

0

NewsFeed

Families were filmed throwing their belongings out of windows in panic as they tried to salvage what they could after Israel gave them ‘minutes to flee’ the Mahna Tower in Gaza City before it was bombed and destroyed.

Chair of OpenAI reaffirms CEO Sam Altman’s assertion of an AI bubble: ‘Many individuals will face financial losses’

0

OpenAI chairman Bret Taylor is not naive to the potentially mammoth consequences of a tech bubble, but he said the prospect isn’t without its benefits. The former Facebook CTO and current CEO of AI business platform Sierra shares the opinion of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman that we’re in an AI bubble—but that’s not entirely a bad thing.

“It is both true that AI will transform the economy, and I think it will, like the internet, create huge amounts of economic value in the future,” Taylor said in the most recent episode of The Verge’s “Decoder” podcast. “I think we’re also in a bubble, and a lot of people will lose a lot of money. I think both are absolutely true at the same time, and there’s a lot of historical precedent for both of those things being true at the same time.”

Altman echoed Taylor’s sentiments last month, warning of big winners and big losers from an AI hype cycle.

“Someone is going to lose a phenomenal amount of money,” Altman said during a dinner for journalists, The Verge reported. “We don’t know who. And a lot of people are going to make a phenomenal amount of money.”

Taylor and Altman join the chorus of industry giants and economists warning about how the astronomical rise of AI has led investors to overhype companies, inflating them beyond their actual worth—with significant financial consequences. Apollo Global Management chief economist Torsten Sløk warned in July that the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 are more overvalued today than they were during the dotcom era 25 years ago. Alibaba’s chair Joseph Tsai and C3.ai CEO Tom Siebel have both warned in the last year that we’re entering an AI bubble. 

The fallout of the dotcom bubble burst in 2000 was weighty: In March, the NASDAQ rose to its peak of 5,048 units, only to plummet to 1,139.90 units in October, a 77% plummet. The downturn, by the time it ended in 2002, had wiped out about $5 trillion in market capitalizations.

Bubble beneficiaries

According to Taylor, it’s worth paying attention to the big winners of the dotcom era when drawing conclusions about the impact of a bubble burst and what it would mean for the tech industry.

“There’s a lot of parallels to the internet bubble,” he said.

Looking at the successful companies that emerged from the early dotcom era is evidence that just because scores of internet companies were overhyped doesn’t mean the hype wasn’t justified for others, according to Taylor. The dotcom bust had famous flops such as Pets.com, a pet-supplies retailer that went belly-up prioritizing rapid growth, and Webvan, a grocery-delivery company that filed for bankruptcy in July 2001—but it also produced Amazon and Google, which have growth to be some of the world’s largest companies, Taylor pointed out. Amazon’s share price has grown nearly 15,000% since October 2000, and Google, which was not a publicly traded company in 2000, has similarly grown, reaching a more than $2.9 trillion market cap

Moreover, even failed companies like Webvan made their mark on the tech work, Taylor said, paving the way for companies like Instacart and DoorDash to build upon the retail delivery companies of the turn of the century.

“You start to look and you say, ‘Actually, if you look at the GDP of the world, how much has actually been created or influenced by the existence of the internet?’ One could argue that all the people in 1999 were kind of right,” he said. “It was as impactful on pretty much every measure.”

Taylor indicated there will be winners of the AI boom, but it’s difficult to say what these wins will look like. He pointed to fiber companies, many of which went under as a result of the dotcom bust, but not before making their mark on improving the speed of data. Most famously, Global Crossing, which had a value of $55 billion in its heyday, went bankrupt in 2002 after failing to find customers to make it profitable. 

“Because of the amount of economic opportunity, you just end up with a ton of investors, and some companies will fail and some will succeed,” Taylor said. “If you look at the people who built out fiber in the early days of the internet, a lot of them went bankrupt, but that fiber ended up getting used, just by the next person or the private equity firm or whatever entity bought it.”

Taylor did not respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

US and China agree on framework for future ownership deal of TikTok

0

The US treasury secretary has said Washington has reached a “framework” deal with China on the ownership of TikTok’s American operations.

Scott Bessent said the framework was set in trade talks in Madrid to pave the way for US ownership. He added that US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would “complete” the deal on Friday. China has not commented.

Trump said on Truth Social that talks in Madrid had “gone very well”, with a deal reached “on a certain company that young people in our country very much wanted to save”.

A deadline is looming for the Chinese owner of TikTok to find a buyer for its American operations or face a ban in the US.

In January, the US Supreme Court upheld a law passed in April 2024, banning the video-sharing app unless its parent company ByteDance sold its US division.

The US Justice Department has said that TikTok’s access to data on American users poses “a national-security threat of immense depth and scale”.

ByteDance has repeatedly insisted that its US operations are fully independent and no data has been shared with the Chinese government. The company argued that the ban would violate free speech protections for its 170 million US users.

TikTok went dark for a day in January after the law came into effect, before Trump intervened and issued a 75-day postponement.

The deadline for a sale has since been extended three times, and the latest delay to the ban is due to end on 17 September.

Various figures have previously been touted as potential buyers of the platform, including Tesla owner Elon Musk, YouTube creator MrBeast and billionaire investor Frank McCourt.

Bessent announced the “framework” deal on the second day of trade talks between the US and China aimed at ending a trade war between the world’s two biggest economies.

Transfers and Graduates Impact Florida Women’s College Team in 2026

0

By Madeline Folsom on SwimSwam

It’s that time of the year again. SwimSwam will be previewing the top 12 men’s and women’s teams (and then some) from the 2025 NCAA Championships. Follow along with the College Swimming Preview Channel. Want to read even more? Check out the latest edition of the SwimSwam magazine.

Women’s #6: Florida Gators

Key Losses: Bella Sims (34 NCAA Points, 4 NCAA Relays), Emma Weyant (19 NCAA Points, 1 NCAA Relay), Mabel Zavaros (17 NCAA Points), Olivia Peoples (11 NCAA Points, 3 NCAA Relays), Micayla Cronk (4 NCAA Relays)

Key Additions: #6 Grace Rabb (TX – back/IM) #9 Lilla Bognar (SC – IM/back), HM Lynsey Bowen (IN – free), BOTR Zuri Ferguson (MA – back), Maria Fernanda Garcia (Mexico – diver), Alexa Fung (Canada – diver), Beatriz Bezerra (Brazil — fly/free), Sylvia Statkevicius (Lithuania — free)

GRADING CRITERIA

Over the years, we’ve gone back and forth on how to project points, ranging from largely subjective rankings to more data-based grading criteria based on ‘projected returning points.’ We like being as objective as possible, but we’re going to stick with the approach we’ve adopted post-COVID. The “stars” will rely heavily on what swimmers actually did last year, but we’ll also give credit to returning swimmers or freshmen who have posted times that would have scored last year.

Since we only profile the top 12 teams in this format, our grades are designed with that range in mind. In the grand scheme of college swimming and compared to all other college programs, top 12 NCAA programs would pretty much all grade well across the board. But in the interest of making these previews informative, our grading scale is tough – designed to show the tiers between the good stroke groups, the great ones, and the 2015 Texas fly group types.

  • 5 star (★★★★★) – a rare, elite NCAA group projected to score 25+ points per event
  • 4 star (★★★★) – a very, very good NCAA group projected to score 15-24 points per event
  • 3 star (★★★) – a good NCAA group projected to score 5-14 points per event
  • 2 star (★★) – a solid NCAA group projected to score 1-4 points per event
  • 1 star (★) –  an NCAA group that is projected to score no points per event, though that doesn’t mean it’s without potential scorers – they’ll just need to leapfrog some swimmers ahead of them to do it

We’ll grade each event discipline: sprint free (which we define to include all the relay-distance freestyle events, so 50, 100 and 200), distance free, IM, breaststroke, backstroke, butterfly and diving. Use these grades as a jumping-off point for discussion, rather than a reason to be angry.

Also, keep in mind that we are publishing many of these previews before teams have posted finalized rosters. We’re making our assessments based on the best information we have available at the time of publication, but we reserve the right to make changes after publication based on any new information that may emerge regarding rosters. If that does happen, we’ll make certain to note the change

2024-25 Season Review

The Gators dropped in the SEC and NCAA standings last season, though their drop at the conference championships was a result of Texas joining the SEC.

Florida finished 6th at the 2025 NCAA Championships with 232 points thanks to an exceptional performance from Bella Sims and double-digit points from Emma Weyant, Mabel Zavaros, Julie Brousseau, and Olivia Peoples.

Sims brought in two second-place finishes in the backstroke events to rack up 34 points in her sophomore season for the Gators. This was slightly off the 56 points she brought in the year before, but she still scored 15 more points than anyone else on the roster.

Senior Weyant brought in 19 points with her 2nd-place finish in the 400 IM and 15th-place finish in the 1650 free. She was joined in the double-digit point club by fifth-year Mabel Zavaros, who scored 17 points with her 13th-place finish in the 500 free and her 6th-place finish in the 400 IM.

Julie Brousseau, a freshman, and Olivia Peoples, another senior, also brought in more than 10 points at 12 and 11, respectively. Brousseau was the only Florida swimmer to score in all three of her events, finishing 10th in the 500 free, 13th in the 400 IM, and 16th in the 1650 free. Peoples, on the other hand, only scored in one, but she brought in 11 points with her 8th place finish in the 100 fly.

They also saw points come in from freshman Anita Bottazzo (9), sophomore Catie Choate (7), sophomore Michaela Mattes (6), freshman Addison Reese (4), and sophomore Lainy Kruger (3).

The Gators also had some very strong relay performances, finishing top three in the 800 freestyle and 400 medley relays and top 10 in the 400 free and 200 medley. The only relay they didn’t score any points in was the 200 freestyle relay, which they have historically struggled with. They had a stronger showing at the SEC Championships, scoring 1,179 points to finish just nine points ahead of Tennessee, which went on to outscore them by more than 60 points at NCAAs.

Sims and Weyant were at the top of the point leaderboard at the SEC Championships as well, scoring 91 and 82 points, respectively, but they were joined by more than 80 points by sophomore diver Camyla Monroy, who scored 80 points in the diving events.

Sprint Freestyle: ★

Florida has historically struggled in the sprint freestyle events. They did not have a single athlete in the 50 or 100 freestyle events at the 2025 NCAA Championships, and the 200 freestyle relay was the only relay in which they did not score points.

Their fastest 50 and 100 freestyler from last season was Bella Sims, and she transferred to Michigan, leaving Addison Reese as the fastest returning sprinter at 22.39 and 48.48, respectively. Neither of these swims is under the NCAA cutline, and Reese focuses on the butterfly events, and would need to see significant drops to score points.

They picked up two international sprint freshmen in Beatriz Bezerra and Sylvia Statkevicius. Bezerra’s LC times convert to 22.26 and 49.21, and Statkevicius comes in slightly slower in the 50 at 22.53, but faster in the 100 at 48.69. None of these swims are under the cutlines of 22.01 and 48.11, but they will be helpful on the sprint relays. Statkevicius also has a 200 freestyle time that converts to 1:45.20, which is about half a second over the 1:44.74 cutline.

The 200 free is the only place they are returning any NCAA scorers from last season, with current junior Lainy Kruger bringing in three points at the 2025 NCAA Championships with her 14th-place finish in the 200. They also have Julie Brousseau, who scored 12 points at NCAAs, coming in under the cutline with her 1:44.18. She did not swim the event last season, competing in the 400 IM instead, where she finished 13th. It seems likely she will make this decision again, but if she chooses to swim the 200, she could be a ‘B’ finalist.

JoJo Ramey also swam the 200 freestyle at NCAAs, finishing 49th in 1:48.05, but her lifetime best in the event would have been 20th. While this is still outside of scoring position, a half-second drop could get her in the ‘B’ final.

Incoming freshman Lynsey Bowen will be another potential swimmer in the 200 freestyle with her best time sitting at 1:45.30, about half a second over the cutline. She hasn’t dropped in the event since 2022, though, and would need a very strong swim to find herself in scoring position.

Distance Freestyle: ★★★

This group received five stars last season, and even though Bella Sims and Emma Weyant will not be returning, the group is still one of their strongest.

Brousseau was their highest finishing swimmer in the 500 last season, touching 10th at the NCAA Championships, and she will be back in the event this year along with Michaela Mattes, who was 45th.

Bowen has a best time of 4:39.51 in the event, which would be just a tenth back of the NCAA cutline in the event, but again, she hasn’t dropped in the event since December of 2023, and she would need to get a full second faster if she wants to beat the 16th-place time from the prelims of 4:38.76.

In the 1650, they have Mattes and Brousseau both returning as NCAA scorers, having finished 11th and 16th last season, respectively, in the event to total seven points for the Gators.

Backstroke: ★★

The Gators saw Bella Sims score 34 points in the backstroke events last season with her 2nd place finish in both the 100 and 200, and they will be hurting with her transfer. They did pick up a few strong freshmen, and they have some of their top backstrokers returning.

Catie Choate is their top returning backstroker, having scored seven points with her 10th-place finish in the 200 backstroke. She did not score in the 100 backstroke, finishing 24th overall, and her best time of 51.54 would still have sat just outside of scoring position at 22nd. She sits just three tenths out of scoring position with 16th place in prelims coming in at 51.20.

Zoe Dixon and JoJo Ramey also swam the 200 backstroke at NCAAs, finishing 26th and 29th, respectively. Both added from their lifetime bests in the event, but their best times would have still been outside scoring position, with Ramey coming the closest with her 1:52.02, which would have been 17th.

Incoming freshman Grace Rabb was their highest-ranked recruit and will bolster the backstroke group as well with her time of 1:52.13, placing her just outside of NCAA scoring in the event. Her 100 backstroke of 52.09 is just over the NCAA cutline of 51.68, but a four-tenth drop isn’t unheard of for a college freshman.

Also joining the backstroke group are Zuri Ferguson, who has times of 52.65 and 1:53.31, and Lilla Bognar, who has been 53.28 and 1:53.29. Ferguson’s 200 backstroke time exactly ties the NCAA cutline in the event, and would make her the potential fifth Gator in the event at this season’s NCAAs. Bognar is not quite as fast in the 100, but her 200 backstroke comes in under the NCAA cutline, and will likely be one of her three events. However, Bognar has not swum a meet in 2025, so we don’t know where her times will be.

Breaststroke: ★★★

Anita Bottazzo was the top breaststroker for the Gators last year, with her best time of 57.49 in the 100 breast ranking her 6th in the NCAA last season. She ended up finishing 9th at the 2025 NCAA Championships after she swam 58.44 in the prelims. Her time in the ‘B’ final (57.84) would have been 4th overall and scored 15 points for the team.

Bottazzo also swam the 200 breast, finishing 20th in prelims. Her best time of 2:08.66 would have been one spot out of finals position at 17th overall, just a tenth behind Letitia Sim’s 2:08.56.

She will be joined by Molly Mayne, who was 37th in the 100 breaststroke and scratched out of the 200 breaststroke after being seeded 25th overall. Her best time in the 200 of 2:08.50 would have been 15th in prelims and finals of the event, scoring two points.

Sofia Plaza was another 200 breaststroker, finishing 41st at the 2025 NCAAs in 2:11.64. Her lifetime best in the event of 2:10.17 was about half a second over the NCAA cutline, but she qualified in the 400 IM.

Butterfly: ★★

Florida graduated their top butterfly swimmer, Olivia Peoples, last season after she scored 11 points in the 100 with her 8th place finish at NCAAs. They will return Addison Reese, who brought in four points with her 13th-place finish in the 200 fly. Reese also finished 39th in the 100 fly at 52.30, just a hundredth off the 52.29 mark she set at the SEC Championships.

Lainy Kruger is another potential finalist in the 200 fly after she finished 24th last year. It took 1:54.16 in prelims to qualify for the final, which is about a second faster than Kruger’s best of 1:55.08.

Incoming freshman Beatriz Bezerra will also make an impact in the fly events. Her 100 fly time of 58.99 converts to 52.80, which would have been 3rd on the team last season, behind Reese and Peoples. It is about a second over the NCAA cutline of 51.87, but she will likely be a conference scorer.

Reese is their only seeded scorer at the moment. Kruger or Bezerra could find their way into potential ‘B’ finals swims, but they would need to drop some significant time.

IM: ★★★½

Florida has a deep medley group, and despite losing their top IMer in Emma Weyant, they will still have a significant number of swimmers in the IM events. At last season’s NCAAs, they had six athletes in the 400 IM and four in the 200 IM.

Brousseau will, yet again, be a major swimmer for the Gators, especially in the 400 IM, where she is their top returning swimmer after she finished 13th in the 400 IM at NCAAs. She is a potential ‘A’ finalist in the event, after she was slightly off at the NCAA Championships.

She touched in 4:05.83 in the final to come in just behind Princeton’s Eleanor Sun, but her lifetime best stands at 4:04.21, which she swam to finish 5th at SECs. That time would have qualified her 7th for the final, where she would have finished 8th, bringing in 11 points.

Brousseau will probably not swim the 200 IM as she is a ‘B’ finalist in the 500 freestyle, and she does not have a SCY time in the event since she never swam it last season.

Zoe Dixon was actually one of the fastest IMers on the Florida team last year, but she struggled last season. At the 2024 NCAA Championships, she finished 8th in the 200 IM and 7th in the 400 IM. At the 2025 NCAA Championships, she finished 17th in the 200 IM, touching in 1:55.59 to add about two seconds from her best of 1:53.73, and 20th in the 400 IM, swimming 4:08.59 to add five seconds from her lifetime best of 4:03.33. If she is able to get back down to her swims from 2024 this year, she is a potential ‘A’ finalist in both events.

Sofia Plaza and Michaela Mattes also swam the 400 IM at the NCAA Championships, finishing 24th and 40th, respectively. Plaza’s lifetime best of 4:07.23 would have qualified for the ‘B’ final in 16th overall, and makes her a potential scorer if she is able to replicate that swim.

Lainy Kruger and Molly Mayne were both entered in the 200 IM. Kruger finished 23rd in 1:56.13, a two-second add from the 1:54.08 mark she set at the SEC Championships, which would make her a ‘B’ finalist. Mayne no-showed the event, but her lifetime best of 1:57.69 would not have earned a finals swim.

The Gators are also bringing in freshmen IMers in the form of Grace Rabb and Lilla Bognar to each take one of the IMs. Rabb is coming in at 1:55.64 in the 200 IM, which would have been 18th in prelims at NCAAs, and Bognar’s time of 4:05.50 from 2022 would have comfortably made the ‘B’ final.

The IM group is deep, but it isn’t exceptionally fast, with only one athlete who scored last year returning. They have the potential to score a lot of points, though, if the athletes are in top form.

Diving: ★★★

The diving events are where Florida has the most potential for improvement. Last year, the Gators scored zero points at the NCAA Championships, despite their third-highest point scorer from SECs being a diver.

Camyla Monroy scored 80 points after winning the 1-meter and placing 6th on the 3-meter and platform. In 2024, she finished 7th on the 1-meter springboard, and clearly maintained that skill with her win at SECs last season. If she is able to perform at NCAAs, she is a potential three-event scorer. Last season, she narrowly missed out on platform (17th) and the 1-meter event (19th).

They are also bringing in three freshmen divers, including Alexa Fung and Maria Fernanda Garcia. Both athletes have international experience, with Fung winning the gold medal in the 1-meter springboard event in 2022 and Fernanda Garcia finishing 12th in the 3-meter and 15th in the 1-meter at the World Championships in Singapore. Both women could come in as NCAA point scorers.

Relays: ★★★

Relays are one of the places where Florida will struggle the most with the loss of Bella Sims. The only relay she did not swim on last year finished 23rd and brought in zero points for the team. Their freshmen will help some, but it is nearly impossible to replace Sims.

They are also having to replace four-relay swimmer Micayla Cronk, who graduated after last season, and was a cornerstone of the Gators’ relays.

Here is how the relays looked last year:

Relay 2025 NCAA Result (Time) Lineup Losing Potential Adds  Season-Best Time
200 FR 23rd (1:28.88) Reese, Choate, Peoples, Cronk Peoples, Cronk Bezerra, Statkevicius 1:28.24 (Sims, Cronk, Peoples, Reese)
400 FR 9th (3:10.82) Sims, Reese, Kruger, Cronk Sims, Cronk Bezerra, Statkevicius Same
800 FR 3rd (6:53.41) Sims, Brousseau, Weyant, Kruger Sims, Weyant Bognar, Statkevicius, Bowen Same
200 MR 5th (1:33.92) Sims, Bottazzo, Peoples, Cronk Sims, Peoples, Cronk Bezerra, Statkevicius, Rabb, Ferguson Same
400 MR 3rd (3:25.18) Sims, Bottazzo, Peoples, Cronk Sims, Peoples, Cronk Bezerra, Statkevicius, Rabb, Ferguson 3:25.78 (same order)

All the Florida relays are losing at least one athlete, though in many cases, there are swimmers coming up who are able to fill empty spaces. Addison Reese only swam two relays at last year’s NCAA Championships, but she will likely be on four this year, swimming the freestyle leg on both medleys as well as on both freestyle relays. Bezerra and Statkevicius are both coming in as well, with times that convert to faster than or right around the splits from last year’s 200 free relay.

The 800 freestyle relay will also probably be okay, though they will struggle to replace Sims’ 1:42.55 from a flat start to lead off the relay. They could still end up in the top 10 with Bognar, Statkevicius, and Bowen all having times in the 1:45 to 1:46 range—though they’ll all need to step up and split sub-1:45.

Bezerra and Statkevicius could both swim on four relays as freshmen, with Bezerra taking over fly legs on the medley and Statkevicius swimming the 200 free, 400 free, and 800 free relays at a minimum.

The medleys are where the Gators will see the most turnover, with three of the four athletes on both relays not returning this year. Rabb and Ferguson are both potential options to take over the backstroke legs, with Ferguson being slightly more likely on the 200 medley and Rabb more likely on the 400 medley. Neither will be able to match Sims’ splits, but they have slightly more help on the back ends.

The freestyle and butterfly legs will be split in some combination between Bezerra, Reese, and Statkevicius, with Bezerra and Reese seeming as the likely fly/free combination right now. Micayla Cronk split 47.63 to come home on the 400 medley last year, with Peoples splitting 50.65 on the fly leg. Reese was 48.61 on the 400 free relay, but her best time of 48.48 from a flat start lends to the idea that she can be faster there. Bezerra comes in with a conversion more than two seconds back of Peoples in 52.80. While they probably won’t finish in the top 3 again, they have five seconds of cushion to remain in the top 10.

The Gators will have a hard time finishing in the top three, like they did twice last year, but they have the potential to still end up in the top 10 for most of the relays.

Total Stars: 20.5/40

2025/26 Outlook

The Florida women are in a tough spot this year, though a very strong recruiting class and some talented returning swimmers will help them as they try to maintain their spot in the NCAA’s top 10 (despite being just two years removed from placed 3rd in 2024).

Returners like Addison Reese, Lainy Kruger, and Julie Brousseau will be crucial in scoring points for the Gators, while the freshmen will come in with major relay duties from the outset. The divers will also need to be exceptional and bring in a significant number of points.

Bella Sims is an incredibly talented swimmer and a very difficult one to try to replace, especially with her wide-ranging abilities and ability to contribute in so many areas. There isn’t one individual swimmer who can take over her duties or make up for the loss of her points, but multiple swimmers could step up to the plate and take pieces.

As far as the SEC goes, the Gators were 2nd last year in a very close race with Tennessee, coming out on top by just nine points. The top three teams were far ahead of the rest of the conference, but Tennessee could overtake them this year, depending on both teams and their freshmen contingents.

WOMEN’S 2025-26 COLLEGE PREVIEW INDEX

RANK (2024) TEAM SPRINT FREE DISTANCE FREE BACK BREAST FLY IM DIVING RELAY TOTAL
1
Virginia Cavaliers
2
Stanford Cardinal
3
Texas Longhorns
4
Indiana Hoosiers
5
Tennessee Volunteers
6 Florida Gators ★★★ ★★ ★★★ ★★ ★★★½ ★★★ ★★★ 20.5/40
7 Louisville Cardinals ★★★★ ★★ ★★½ ★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★★★ 22.5/40
8 Cal Golden Bears ★★★½ ★★★★ ★★★½ ★★★ ★★★★ ★★½ ★★★★ 25.5/40
9 Michigan Wolverines ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★½ ★★★★★ 26.5/40
10 NC State Wolfpack ★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★ ★★ ★★★★ 23/40
11 USC Trojans ★★★★ ★★★ ★½ ★★★½ ★★ ★★★ 19/40
12 Wisconsin Badgers ★★ ★★½ ★★ ★★ 12.5/40

Read the full story on SwimSwam: 2026 College Previews: #6 Florida Women Hit Hard By Transfers and Graduates

Spotify eliminates shuffle limitation for free tier users

0

Spotify just announced a major upgrade to the on-demand playback controls available on the free version of its app.

The first in a trio of updates allows mobile ad-supported users to ‘pick and play‘ specific tracks in any playlist, and on any album track list.

The change, which rolls out globally today (September 15), marks a significant shift from the platform’s longstanding shuffle-only model for free users.

Spotify has added two other on-demand features for free users:

  • Search & Play: Free users can search for individual songs and play them on-demand.
  • Share & Play: Tracks shared by friends in a message, or artists via social media, can be played on mobile immediately (previously only available on desktop or tablet).

The streaming giant hopes that a more generous free tier will increase engagement, boost ad revenues, help retain free users, and ultimately convert those ad-supported users to Premium subscribers.

The freemium enhancements arrive alongside Spotify’s recent Premium upgrades, including a playlist mixing tool and the launch of lossless audio for paid subscribers – but not as part of a rumored higher-priced “superpremium” or “Music Pro” tier as suggested in reports earlier this year.

Spotify also launched a direct message feature inside its app for both Free and Premium users last month.

These free and premium updates raise questions about what this all means for Spotify’s long-awaited ‘Super Premium’ service and whether any of these tools could one day become ‘Super Premium’ perks.

“Together with our industry partners, we still have a job to do to come up with more interesting and exciting products that we could layer on top of the current subscription landscape,” said Gustav Gyllenhammar, VP of Markets and Subscriptions at Spotify, commenting on the platform’s subscription tier roadmap.

“But we have no news to share just now about what those products would be,” he added, speaking exclusively with Music Business Worldwide.

“Together with our industry partners, we still have a job to do to come up with more interesting and exciting products that we could layer on top of the current subscription landscape.”

 Gustav Gyllenhammar, Spotify 

The higher-priced subscription concept has been tested in China by Tencent Music Entertainment, whose Super VIP tier recently surpassed 15 million subscribers. These SVIP users generate five times the revenue of regular subscribers.

Bloomberg reported in February that Spotify was considering charging up to $5.99 more per month on top of a Premium subscription for access to a so-called ‘Music Pro’ tier, which would include various ‘superfan‘ perks.

An individual Spotify Premium subscription is currently priced at $11.99 in the US, following the most recent price rise in June 2024. This would bring the combined cost of a Premium subscription plus the Music Pro add-on to around $18 per month.

Spotify’s freemium “Glow up” (in Gyllenhammar’s words) comes as the platform faces intensified competition from platforms like YouTube and TikTok for younger audiences.

Gyllenhammar explained that the decision to give more on-demand control to free users was in part driven by Gen Z user behavior, which showed retention challenges with the existing free mobile experience.

“Young users felt like the old Spotify free experience on mobile was almost broken,” he said. “They tried to tap on things, and it didn’t work. The behavior that young users have in their media consumption models today – they really expect this to work.”

He added: “Obviously we saw retention challenges with an experience that is not living up to users’ needs.”

“Young users felt like the old Spotify free experience on mobile was almost broken.”

Gustav Gyllenhammar, Spotify

The Search & Play feature in particular fundamentally changes the free user experience from passive consumption to active discovery.

Users can now search for and instantly play any specific song they hear about via TikTok, word of mouth etc.

“Maybe our friend Ed Sheeran releases a new song today, and he has some new songs that you’ve heard about. You can search for the song name, and you can play that song,” said Gyllenhammar.

With the Share & Play feature, Spotify seeks to address what it says was a user frustration with the previous version of the free app.

Mobile ad-supported users weren’t able to tap and immediately play a track shared with them via a private messaging app (or Spotify’s new DM service), or through an artist’s social channels.

Spotify is keen to highlight how today’s update addresses that latter point.

“Artists who now share links on social can be reassured that everyone on Spotify, Free or Premium, will be able to listen,” the company said in a statement.


While more on-demand access is being introduced, Gyllenhammar confirmed there are still limitations on usage, though he declined to specify the exact number of daily on-demand minutes available to free users.

A spokesperson for Spotify confirmed “on-demand time is calculated as the time a user spends listening to music that has started playing due to an ‘on-demand’ action, either Pick & Play or Skipping”.

They added: “Though this update provides more control to listeners on free, there is still a limit to on-demand skips. Only Spotify Premium users have complete control to play and skip music without restrictions.” (Skipping for free users of the app was previously limited to six an hour).

The move represents a carefully calculated risk for Spotify, whose premium subscriptions generate 90% of the company’s revenue.

Gyllenhammar emphasized that 60% of premium subscribers start on the free tier, making free user engagement crucial for long-term growth.

“By opening up and widening the experience on free, we’re able to accelerate growth of our free tier, both from a number of users as well as engagement,” he said.

According to Gyllenhammar, testing across multiple emerging markets over 18 months prior to the global roll-out showed positive impacts on both free user retention and premium conversion rates.

Spotify’s global Premium Subscriber base at the close of Q2 reached 276 million paying users, which was up by +8 million net subs on the 268 million that the firm counted at the end of the prior quarter (Q1 2025).

Spotify’s total Monthly Active Users, which combine paying users and ad-supported users, grew 11% year over year to 696 million, up +18 million MAUs from the 678 million reported for the prior quarter (Q1 2025).



Gyllenhammar also highlighted the potential benefits of the new freemium functionality for the company’s ads business.

“With increased free engagement and increased free audience, as well as more time spent on platform for free users, and also more focused time spent for free users – because if you can go in and pick your songs and so on, it means that it’s a boon for our advertising business,” he said.

He added: “We can now have much higher-performing advertising units for our users. So we feel strongly that this should be something that can drive accelerated profitability and revenue generation on the free tier from advertisers. That’s another part of why this move is important for us.”

Spotify’s Ad-Supported Revenue in Q2 2025 was €453 million ($514m), up 5% YoY on a constant currency basis, reflecting growth across music and podcast advertising.


Today’s update marks the biggest adjustment to Spotify’s free tier in nearly six years.

The company rolled out more on-demand elements for ad-supported users in 2018, including the ability to select individual tracks in up to 15 different playlists such as Discover Weekly, Rap Caviar and Today’s Top Hits.

The ‘pick and play‘ addition announced today lets users of the ad-supported version of the app choose and play specific tracks in any playlist, and on any album track list.Music Business Worldwide

Kodak Charmera camera provides a fun and retro charm.

0

Kodak’s latest camera is an adorable little package of whimsy that can also make for a thoughtful gift. The Charmera is truly small enough to serve as a keychain, can shoot digital photos and video, and is mighty affordable at just $30 a pop.

Weighing just over 1 oz (30 g) and about the size of a film roll, the tiny Charmera features a viewfinder, an LCD screen, a Type-C port for charging and transferring your shots, a flash, and a microSD card slot for up to 128 GB of storage.

It shoots 1.6-megapixel JPEG photos at 1,440 x 1,440 resolution, and 30-fps video in AVI format. Don’t expect stellar output from the 1/4-inch-type CMOS sensor and 35-mm f/2.4 lens: this is made for lo-fi results that hark back to Kodak’s super-compact Fling camera from the 80s.

The bold yellow Charmera is a beauty, but I’m drawn to the translucent Secret Edition that’s harder to get

Kodak

In fact, it includes a small selection of photo filters and photo frames to apply to your shots and give even more of a retro look. They handily appear on screen as overlays to give you a preview as you compose your shot.

The Charmera is pretty functional for its size, with a viewfinder, LCD preview screen, and a flash
The Charmera is pretty functional for its size, with a viewfinder, LCD preview screen, and a flash

Kodak

There are seven different colorways inspired by Kodak’s design language from the late 80s to collect. You can either purchase an individual blind box for US$30 – which means you won’t know which colorway is inside until you receive and open it – or you can pick up a set of six. Good luck getting the ‘secret edition’ with a transparent case though, which has a lower chance of randomly being included in your order.

Naturally, you’ll be able to get higher fidelity images out of the camera in your phone than with this. But if you’ve ever used an instant or disposable camera, you’ll know that there’s something special about shooting with an imperfect device built for capturing fun moments. And if you’re a fan of the brand, there are a lot of design elements and details – including a photo border that resembles old photo editing software – in the Charmera package to nerd out on.

The Charmera is hands down the cutest camera of 2025
The Charmera is hands down the cutest camera of 2025

Kodak

Find the Charmera on Kodak’s Reto Pro site; it’s currently sold out but is expected to be restocked soon.

Product page: Kodak