20 C
New York
Sunday, September 21, 2025
Home Blog Page 53

McDonald’s CEO faces challenges of a ‘two-tier economy’ while reducing prices on value meals

0

McDonald’s is banking on burgers and fries to tell a bigger story about the American economy. Chief Executive Chris Kempczinski is slimming down the cost of the fast-food giant’s value meals as he grapples with what he calls a “two-tier economy”—a widening divide between consumers who are still spending freely and those who are pulling back.

For years, dating back to the 2022 inflation wave, McDonald’s and its fast-food rivals have contended with shopper frustration over rising menu prices, with combo meals increasingly breaking into double digits. Customers at the higher end of the income spectrum continue to order premium products and use delivery apps at healthy rates. Lower-income diners, however, are cutting back, Kempczinski argued in an interview on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” treating fast food less as a daily convenience and more as an occasional splurge. He told the anchors that McDonald’s has been on a “value journey” over the last year or so.

“Particularly with middle and lower-income consumers, they’re feeling under a lot of pressure right now,” Kempczinski told the CNBC anchors. ”There’s a lot of commentary around, ‘What’s the state of the economy, how’s it doing right now?’ And what we see is, it’s really kind of a two-tier economy. If you’re upper-income, earning over $100,000, things are good … what we see with middle and lower-income consumers, it’s actually a different story.” He cited traffic for these demographics being down double digits and they’re skipping breakfast or eating at home.

Kempczinski was pressed on some political issues by the CNBC anchors, including whether McDonald’s fits with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy’s MAHA, or “Make America Healthy Again,” and the policy around no taxes on tips. Kempczinski said he personally supported the no taxes on tips issue but clarified that it didn’t help McDonald’s much, as it doesn’t allow tips. A tips restaurant requires a minimum wage of just $2.13 per hour, he added, which hasn’t been changed since 1991, calling this an “uneven playing field” as “you’re essentially getting the customer to pay for your labor,” plus the tax-free benefit. He called for one federal minimum wage for all kinds of restaurants and then said McDonald’s was “open” to raising the federal minimum wage beyond that, adding that the company was “in dialogue” with the White House about several issues including this one.

The current federal minimum wage in the United States is $7.25 per hour, a rate that has been unchanged since July 24, 2009. This long-standing rate marks over 16 years without a federal increase, making it the longest period in U.S. history without an update to the minimum wage. However, many states and localities have adopted higher minimum wage rates, some reaching as high as $18 per hour in the District of Columbia.

In 2025, significant new legislation called the Raise the Wage Act of 2025 was introduced in Congress. This proposed law would incrementally increase the federal minimum wage to $17 per hour by the year 2030, phasing out subminimum wage rates for tipped workers, workers with disabilities, and youth workers. Additionally, a Senate bill was proposed to raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour starting January 1 of the first year after its passage. These legislative efforts indicate active momentum at the federal level to increase the minimum wage after more than a decade of stagnation.

Different from the Great Recession

Kempczinski added that this isn’t like what McDonald’s saw during the Great Recession, “when everyone traded down.” And so McDonald’s has to be creative to play both sides of the issue. Increased accessibility for lower-income consumers now comes in the form of a revamped $5 meal bundle, along with more aggressive price promotions in flagship markets. Advertising campaigns are leaning heavily on the theme of value, a message designed to resonate with cost-conscious families forced to make sharper trade-offs in their daily spending.

The strategy underscores a balancing act for McDonald’s. As one of the few global chains with the size and procurement power to cut prices without immediately crippling profitability, the company can play offense where smaller rivals cannot. Still, franchisees—who operate most U.S. locations—are wary that thinner price points could turn into margin squeezes just as wages, rent, and insurance remain high. Still, Kempczinski told the CNBC anchors that the move toward more value was “almost unanimous” among franchisees, to a surprised reaction.

The broader retail picture

McDonald’s dual-track strategy echoes a broader split visible across much of the U.S. economy. Big-box retailers like Walmart and Target report a similar trend that Dollar General CEO Todd Vasos put his finger on in March: “Many of our customers report that only have enough money for basic essentials.” Delta Air Lines, a proxy for demand among the affluent consumer cohort, has largely gone from strength to strength as America’s most profitable airline, although it has lowered guidance during 2025, owing to uncertainty from the Trump tariff regime.

The trends recall an economic pattern established during the pandemic: the “K-shaped” economy. As Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon, explained to Fortune in 2023, this means that middle and lower-income consumers are one leg of the “K,” pointing down and to the right, while the upper-income cohort is doing better and better.

McDonald’s, though, has to master the “K” to get the most out of its consumers. That means fighting to maintain its decades-old position as the go-to spot for an affordable meal, even as it courts higher-margin opportunities to keep shareholders satisfied. Whether that balancing act proves sustainable may depend on just how long America’s two-track consumer economy sticks around.

For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. 

Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

Three people killed in Lisbon historic funicular railway accident

0

At least three people have been killed and 20 others injured after Lisbon’s famous Gloria funicular derailed and crashed, emergency services said.

The head of Portugal’s Civil Protection Authority said that several people remained trapped at the scene and nine people were in a serious condition.

Footage shared widely on social media showed the yellow tram-like structure overturned and almost entirely destroyed. People could be seen fleeing the area on foot as what appears to be smoke filled the air.

Portuguese President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa has issued a statement expressing his “sympathy and solidarity with the families affected by this tragedy”.

It is unclear how many people were on board at the time of the cable railway crash, which occurred near the Avenida da Liberdade around 18:05 on Wednesday evening.

It is not known whether those killed are Portuguese nationals or foreigners.

Portuguese newspaper Observador reported that a cable came loose along the railway’s route, causing it to lose control and collide with a nearby building.

Sixty-two emergency service personnel and 22 vehicles are at the scene, according to the civil protection website.

The Gloria Funicular is one of the most famous sights and tourist attractions in Lisbon. It was opened in 1885 and electrified three decades later.

The iconic yellow trams are a crucial part of a city as hilly as Lisbon. They snake their way up many of the cobbled streets.

This particular tram that crashed travels some 275m (900ft) from Restauradores, a square in the middle of Lisbon, up to the picturesque, cobbled streets of an area called Bairro Alto – or high neighbourhood – taking just three minutes to make the journey.

It, and the other funiculars, are used by Lisbon residents but they are also extremely popular with tourists – and at the end of the summer, the Portuguese capital is very busy indeed.

The Lisbon authorities say it is too early to determine the cause of this incident – and how many people were caught up in it.

In 2025, Sabrina Carpenter’s ‘Man’s Best Friend’ sets new Spotify record for single-day streams by a female artist

0

Sabrina Carpenter’s seventh studio album, Man’s Best Friend, has broken the record for the most-streamed album on Spotify in a single day by a female artist this year.

The achievement was announced by Spotify on its social media pages on Tuesday (September 2).

Commenting on the achievement in a post on social media platform X, Carpenter wrote: “I can’t believe this :’) thank you so much for listening.”

Man’s Best Friend, which dropped on Friday (August 29), spent 11 weeks on Spotify’s Countdown Page ahead of its release.

“I can’t believe this. thank you so much for listening.”

Sabrina Carpenter

The record includes Manchild, which marks Carpenter’s first debut at No.1  on the Billboard Hot 100, her second No.1 US hit overall (after Please Please Please) and her fourth Hot 100 Top 10.

The new record follows Short n’ Sweet, her sixth studio album in 2024 that produced hits like Espresso and Please Please Please, which both topped the Billboard Global 200 chart.

Short n’ Sweet received eight nominations at the 2025 Grammy Awards including Album of the Year. It won Best Pop Vocal Album and Best Pop Solo Performance for Espresso.

The former Disney star worked again with producers Jack Antonoff and John Ryan in Man’s Best Friend, blending disco-pop, funk, R&B and synth-rock elements.

The record draws inspiration from 1907s artists including Donna Summer, ABBA and Dolly Parton, Carpenter revealed during an Instagram Live in June.

Music Business Worldwide

A Close Look at China’s Newest Missiles, Drones, and Submarines

0

At its military parade on Wednesday, China showcased hypersonic missiles to sink ships, drones that serve as wingmen and nuclear-capable ballistic missiles that can strike the continental United States.

The jets that screamed across the sky and the columns of missiles and armored vehicles that rolled past Tiananmen Square in Beijing provided a rare look at China’s new weapons.

All military hardware paraded

Note: Only equipment paraded on the ground is shown, excluding three support and logistics formations.

The massive military parade, presided over by China’s leader Xi Jinping, was a warning to his country’s prospective foes.

The anti-ship missiles seemed tailor-made to menace American forces in the Asia-Pacific region. Long-range rocket launchers magnified Beijing’s threat to Taiwan, the self-governed island democracy. The armored vehicles that can be dropped from planes appeared to extend China’s ability to defend its growing global interests.

If one theme stood out, analysts said, it was that the People’s Liberation Army is betting on unmanned systems to gain a potential edge in battle.

New Missile Threats to U.S. Navy Ships

One of the parade’s strongest warnings to U.S. forces was in four new models of anti-ship missiles, three of which were hypersonic, according to state media, meaning they travel at least five times the speed of sound and can maneuver to evade defenses.

“Beijing’s decision to showcase these weapons sends a not-so-subtle message to Taiwan and Washington that China has the ability to threaten American warships,” said Timothy R. Heath, a senior researcher at the global policy institute RAND who studies the Chinese military.

For China, having more advanced hypersonic missiles bearing down at different speeds and angles on enemy warships may make it harder for an enemy navy to avoid or counter attacks.

The most notable of the anti-ship missiles might be the YJ-19, a cruise missile that appears to use a “scramjet,” which burns its fuel in an airflow moving at supersonic speed, a design that helps give the missile its high speed.

Hypersonic anti-ship missile

Photo by Tingshu Wang/Reuters

The missile’s features suggest that it could have both a highly unpredictable flight path and the ability to fly its last leg at a lower altitude than ballistic missiles, albeit at a slower speed, said Eric Heginbotham, a principal research scientist in the security studies program of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

It was unclear whether the YJ-19 and other new missiles were already in service. The potential impact on U.S. Navy ships’ vulnerability will depend on how many of the missiles China can make and deploy, Mr. Heginbotham said.

“Not all of what they will show will be operational,” he said of the parade. “That’s been true in the past, and it remains true now.”

New Weapons for Ground Troops

The parade showcased new armored ground vehicles that could be dropped from transport planes. The vehicles had what appeared to be periscope-like viewers to allow troops to observe their surroundings from inside the vehicles.

New airborne combat vehicles

Photo by Maxim Shemetov/Reuters

The new vehicles showed that China was investing in possible rapid deployment to Taiwan or even far beyond China, said Joshua Arostegui, the research director of the China Landpower Studies Center at the U.S. Army War College.

“Adding such advanced armor to the airborne corps will give these light infantry forces much more firepower and protection when they are dropped behind enemy lines or rapidly responding to dangerous situations abroad,” he said.

Also featured were remote-controlled armored buggies that can clear mines and pick up wounded soldiers. “The biggest issue with these systems is going to be cost and repair,” Mr. Arostegui noted.

A Glimpse of Future Sea and Air Combat

Two sleek submersible drones made their debut, signaling China’s ambitions to compete with the United States beneath the waves using “extra-large uncrewed undersea vehicles.”

One was a 60-foot, torpedo-shaped vessel with a smooth hull, while the other had small masts that could be used for communications.

Source: U.S. Army ODIN

Photo by Ng Han Guan/Associated Press

Little is publicly known about China’s new undersea vehicles, or how they stack up against similar vehicles being developed by the United States, Russia and other naval powers. What stands out is the sheer number of undersea vehicles that China is developing, said Jennifer Parker, a former anti-submarine warfare officer in the Australian Navy.

“The range of types indicates they may be more advanced in this endeavor than other countries,” said Ms. Parker, now an expert at the National Security College of Australian National University.

China may also be looking to arm some of its models, Ms. Parker suggested, pointing to the features of the AJX002 model shown at the parade. “Given the lack of masts and its size, it looks like it’s weaponized,” she said. “Could be some sort of self-propelled mine or torpedo-like capability.”

Jet fighters, bombers and other air force planes also roared through the sky, while on the ground, trucks carried large drones that looked like small fighter jets. It was a sign of China’s plans to pair manned and unmanned aircraft in future wars.

Photo by Maxim Shemetov/Reuters

China and other powers are betting that artificial intelligence will make it possible for piloted jets to fly alongside such so-called “loyal wingmen” drones, which may help surveil and attack enemy aircraft and block missiles from hitting the manned fighters.

The number of large drones and unmanned planes in the parade showed that China is heavily committed to this new field, said Andreas Rupprecht, an expert on Chinese military aviation who is based in Germany. “In many technological areas, it is in the fast lane — sometimes on par with, or even ahead of, leading powers,” he said.

None of the unmanned planes were shown in flight, though. They may still be a work in progress.

Nuclear Expansion

Among the most closely watched weapons were China’s nuclear forces. That included the missiles labeled “DF-31BJ” that rumbled past Tiananmen Square, hinting at the country’s plans to expand its intercontinental force, which could strike the United States.

The label indicated that the missile may be a version of China’s road-mobile DF-31 intercontinental nuclear missile, adapted for silo launch, said Ankit Panda, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and author of “The New Nuclear Age.”

Photo by Tingshu Wang/Reuters

China displayed nuclear-capable missiles for submarines and aircraft at the parade, but it does not disclose how many nuclear weapons it has. The Federation of American Scientists estimates that China has about 600 warheads. China has also upgraded the missiles, submarines and bombers that can carry the warheads.

In recent years, China built three missile silo fields in its northern deserts, and the appearance of the DF-31BJ missile at the parade seemed to bolster U.S. military assessments that the missile would be installed in at least some of the 320 or so silos, Mr. Panda said.

About 10 of the silos in each field may have already been loaded with missiles, the Federation of American Scientists said in a recent report. But the Chinese government has said little in public about the silo fields.

“For now, parading the DF-31BJ is likely the closest we’ll come to China acknowledging new silos,” Mr. Panda said.

Challenging Client Situation

0



Client Challenge



JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

The origins of the US strike on a Venezuelan boat: Exploring the implications | Conflict News

0

President Donald Trump has released a video showing a United States military strike on a boat in the Caribbean that he says was smuggling drugs out of Venezuela for the Tren de Aragua gang, stoking fears of a possible clash between the Venezuelan and US militaries.

In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump said 11 people were killed on Tuesday. He wrote: “No US Forces were harmed in this strike. Please let this serve as notice to anybody even thinking about bringing drugs into the United States of America. BEWARE!”

The strike, apparently carried out in international waters, marks an escalation in tensions between the Trump administration and Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, whom Trump has repeatedly accused of assisting international drug gangs.

The incident is the first known attack the US has made against alleged smugglers since the Trump administration began increasing its military presence in the Caribbean last month to counter drug cartels designated as “narcoterrorist organisations”.

What happened?

The Trump administration dispatched warships to the southern Caribbean in August in a bid, it said, to counter threats to US national security posed by criminal organisations operating in the region.

The New York Times reported that Trump had signed a secret directive ordering the Pentagon to use military force against certain Latin American drug cartels that the US considers “terrorist organisations”.

On Thursday, the Reuters news agency reported that seven US warships and one nuclear-powered fast attack submarine were headed for the Caribbean. More than 4,500 sailors and Marines are on board the vessels.

Then on Tuesday, Trump announced the strike on the Venezuelan boat he said was transporting drugs.

(Al Jazeera)

Trump identified the people on board the Venezuelan boat as “narcoterrorists” who were “at sea in International waters transporting illegal narcotics, heading to the United States”.

The Tren de Aragua is one of Venezuela’s most notorious criminal organisations with operations spreading across Latin America.

Originating in the early 2000s among prison inmates in the state of Aragua, the gang initially controlled contraband and extortion networks inside jails before expanding outwards.

Today, it runs a diversified criminal empire spanning drug trafficking, human smuggling, extortion, illegal mining and contract killings.

The group is especially active along migration routes, exploiting vulnerable refugees and migrants through kidnapping, forced labour and sex trafficking.

The Trump administration has repeatedly claimed there is a direct link between groups like Tren de Aragua and Venezuela’s government. According to Trump, Maduro controls the gang as part of a “narcoterrorism” ploy to destabilise the US.

On August 7, the US Departments of State and Justice doubled their reward for information leading to the arrest of Maduro to $50m, accusing him of being “one of the largest narcotraffickers in the world”.

For his part, Maduro denies any connection to the group. At least two reports from the US intelligence community also contradict the Trump administration’s claim.

In May, a declassified National Intelligence Council report found that Maduro’s government “probably does not have a policy of cooperating with” Tren de Aragua.

The report also said Maduro is “not directing” the gang’s operations in the US although it did concede that Venezuela offers a “permissive environment” that allows Tren de Aragua to operate.

Maduro
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro said at a news conference on September 1, 2025, in Caracas that his government has been targeted by eight military ships and 1,200 missiles, calling it the greatest threat to Venezuela for 100 years [Jesus Vargas/Getty Images]

What does the US strike mean for Venezuela-US relations?

The US deployment piqued concerns over spiralling tensions with Venezuela after Maduro urged millions of Venezuelans in August to join nationalist “militias” to defend Venezuela in response to Washington’s aggressive new antidrug operations in the Caribbean.

In the run-up to the US strike on the Venezuelan boat this week, Maduro said on August 25: “No empire will touch the sacred soil of Venezuela.”

The Venezuelan president has long accused the US government of interfering in his country’s politics on behalf of the political opposition. In last week’s remarks, he also accused Trump of “seeking a regime change through military threat”.

Trump, meanwhile, has adopted the same “maximum pressure” campaign that defined his foreign policy towards Venezuela during his first term. It included heightened sanctions on the Latin American country.

In spite of this, the US energy group Chevron returned to Venezuela in July after a three-month hiatus after Trump’s decision in February to rescind a US Treasury licence that allowed the oil giant to export crude from Venezuela despite US sanctions.

Trump revoked the existing licence, which was issued during President Joe Biden’s administration in 2022, over what he saw as a “failure” by Maduro to implement electoral reforms and accept Venezuelans deported from the US, forcing Chevron to pause operations and wind down its activities.

But after intense lobbying, Chevron was granted a new restricted licence by the Department of the Treasury to export Venezuelan crude. That decision was considered to amount to an easing of sanctions on Venezuela’s oil sector.

While the precise licence conditions remain unknown, experts said the agreement will bring benefits to Venezuela’s debt-strapped economy as Chevron is expected to send 200,000 barrels of oil per day from Venezuela to international markets.

Christopher Sabatini, senior research fellow for Latin America at Chatham House, said the Trump administration is facing “competing objectives” in Venezuela.

Sabatini told Al Jazeera that the Treasury’s recent move to reinstate Chevron’s (albeit restricted) licence “is a recognition, in part, of the failure of past sanctions” insofar as they ceded control of Venezuelan oil assets from Chevron to “governments opposed to US interests, … China, Russia and Iran”.

He added that “by mobilising this fleet [in the Caribbean], the administration is also trying to scare Maduro into potential regime change.” The upshot, Sabatini said, is that Trump’s two-pronged policy approach “risks causing an unintended conflict with Venezuela”.

How are US relations with the rest of the region?

In talks with leaders from Mexico and Ecuador, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio will make the case this week for broad cooperation on migration and drug trafficking, which the Trump administration views as crucial for security across the Americas.

Rubio’s trip on Wednesday and Thursday is likely to be complicated by the fact that Trump has rattled many leaders across the region with sweeping tariffs for not complying with his geopolitical aims, experts said.

The main problem, Sabatini said, is that US “demands are a moving target and prone to the whims of Donald Trump”.

In the case of Brazil, for instance, Trump slapped 50 percent tariffs on the country’s goods in August partly in retaliation for the government’s pursuit of criminal charges against former President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally.

Looking ahead, Sabatini expected countries in Latin America to “slow-walk their responses to Trump without cravenly buckling to his pressure, … [likely resulting in] geopolitical instability”.

US dollar weakens against major currencies, Euro strengthens following release of US jobs report

0

Dollar drops against peers, euro gains after U.S. jobs data

Xi, Putin, and Kim present unified front with unveiling of new weapons

0

Laura BickerChina correspondent , Beijing and

Thomas MackintoshBBC News

Watch: Key moments from China’s military parade

The leaders of China, Russia and North Korea have appeared in public together for the first time in a show of solidarity at a massive military parade in Beijing.

President Xi Jinping said the world faced a choice between peace and war as China unveiled a huge arsenal of weapons – including nuclear missiles with a global reach – to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two.

The display was not just a look at where China has been, or how far it has come – it was a showcase of where the country is going.

Xi played the role of a global leader prepared to stand alongside two of the most sanctioned leaders in the world: Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un.

And, at the Chinese leader’s feet, a military which is being built to rival the West.

The parade was a choreographed spectacle of precision, power and patriotism. Thousands of soldiers paraded equipment on Wednesday, demonstrating China’s military modernisation programme.

But, one of the most enduring images of the parade took place before the first cannon was fired.

President Xi welcomed Kim with a long handshake, then moved on to greet Putin, before all three walked together to watch the parade.

This was the first time all three leaders have been seen in public together, and they really picked their moment.

Later, on the sidelines, Putin and Kim met, with Putin praising Pyongyang for sending soldiers to fight in Ukraine.

Putin and Kim joined 24 other dignitaries who had been invited to the Beijing parade on behalf of Xi.

Former top leaders of China also stood at the Tiananmen viewing platform – but notably absent was former president Hu Jintao.

South Korea’s President Lee Jae Myung did get an invitation, but turned it down. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi – who met President Xi earlier this week – was also not present.

Getty Images Chinese female troops march during a parade to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War in Asia. Getty Images

The parade was a choreographed spectacle of precision, power and patriotism

Among the world leaders attending were Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian, Pakistan’s PM Shehbaz Sharif, Vietnam’s Luong Cuong and Zimbabwe’s Emmerson Mnangagwa.

Most Western leaders opted not to attend China’s “Victory Day” parade.

The two that did make the journey – Slovakia’s Robert Fico and Aleksandar Vucic of Serbia – posed for photos with Putin after the main event.

They all watched on as around 50,000 spectators – all vetted in advance – attended the parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square.

Reuters Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and heads of foreign delegations arrive for a military parade Reuters

It was President Vladimir Putin, President Xi Jinping and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un’s their first public appearance together

President Xi inspected thousands of soldiers from different branches of the Chinese military who had gathered on Changan Avenue.

Laser weapons, robotic “wolves” and giant underwater nuclear drones were among new weapons on display.

China also showed off its stealth attack drones, dubbed the “loyal wingman”, as they are capable of flying alongside a manned fighter jet and aid it in its attacks.

Thousands of doves and balloons were later released into the skies above Tiananmen Square to mark the end of the parade.

Guests then enjoyed a lunch reception at the Great Hall of the People where they could choose between a red or white Chinese wine.

President Xi gave a toast to say the world must “never return to the law of the jungle”.

He did not address any Western nations specifically in his five-minute speech, but Chinese officials have previously called the US a “bully” for its imposition of tariffs on countries around the world.

Xi added: “We sincerely hope that all countries will draw lessons from history, value peace and work together to… create a brighter future for humanity”.

He concluded by toasting to “common prosperity for all humankind”.

Putin and Kim then held bilateral talks at Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in a meeting which lasted two-and-a-half hours.

The pair discussed North Korea’s contribution in the Ukraine war and reflected on an agreement struck last June between the two nations.

It is now estimated that up to 15,000 North Korean troops have joined Russian soldiers on the front lines in Ukraine.

North Korea has also supplied Russia with ammunition. In exchange, North Korea is believed to have received money and help with weapons development.

Reuters Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un hug as they both left the meeting in BeijingReuters

Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un hug as they both left the meeting in Beijing

It was the meeting between Xi, Kim and Putin – not just the weapons and troops on show – that appears to have grabbed the attention of Donald Trump.

The US president, who did not attend, took to his social media platform and accused President Xi of conspiring against the US with Russia and North Korea.

“Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against The United States of America,” Trump posted on Truth Social.

Kremlin spokesperson Yuri Ushakov rejected any suggestion of a conspiracy against the US, according to Russian state media.

Ushakov called Trump’s words “ironic” and said Putin, Xi and Kim are “not even thinking about a conspiracy against the United States” and that the three leaders understand Washington’s role “in the current international situation”.

Sean Quinn Named Competitor Coach of the Month

0

By James Sutherland on SwimSwam

Competitor Coach of the Month is a recurring SwimSwam feature shedding light on a U.S.-based coach who has risen above the competition. As with any item of recognition, Competitor Coach of the Month is a subjective exercise meant to highlight one coach whose work holds noteworthy context – perhaps a coach who was clearly in the limelight, or one whose work fell through the cracks a bit more among other stories. If your favorite coach wasn’t selected, feel free to respectfully recognize them in our comment section.

Mecklenburg Swim Association’s National Prep coach Sean Quinn lands Competitor Coach of the Month honors after placing three swimmers on the U.S. World Junior Championship team and earning a role on the American coaching staff as an assistant.

Quinn has been leading the National Prep group at Mecklenburg under head coach David Geyer since 2021, having spent three years as an assistant at UNC and then two at SwimMAC Carolina.

Qualifying for the U.S. World Junior team from Mecklenburg this year were Mike RiceKayda Geyer and Norvin Clontz, all of whom had strong performances.

Rice, 17, won a gold medal after leading off the winning U.S. mixed 4×100 free relay team in a time of 49.80, which was under his official personal best time of 49.84 set in mid-July.

Two days later, Rice set a new PB of 49.49 in the prelims of the boys’ 100 free, advancing 3rd into the semis. Despite adding just over a tenth and ultimately finishing 9th in the semis in 49.61, his new best time moved him into 27th all-time in the boys’ 17-18 age group.

Rice also recorded a pair of sub-49 relay splits for the U.S., including anchoring the boys’ 4×100 free relay in 48.85 en route to a bronze medal. He was also 48.95 in the prelims of the boys’ 4×100 free relay, and added 49.13 and 49.40 anchor legs on the boys’ 4×100 medley relay that finished 5th.

Geyer, also 17, earned a spot on the team after a standout summer that included a big personal best in the 100 breast (1:09.37) in mid-May and then cracking the ‘A’ final in the 200 breast at U.S. Nationals in June when she clocked 2:28.79 in the prelims.

At World Juniors, Geyer was again a finalist in the 200 breast, placing 8th in 2:29.58, and she made the semis in the 100 breast, finishing 14th in 1:09.73.

Clontz, 18, set a PB in the 200 free (1:49.32) and a season-best in the 400 free (3:51.26) at U.S. Nationals to earn a berth on the team, and went on to finish 9th in the 400 free (3:51.86) and 24th in the 200 free (1:51.25) at World Juniors. He also split 1:49.07 in the prelims of the 4×200 free relay before the U.S. team was disqualified for an early takeoff.

The U.S. team topped the medal table at World Juniors with 10 gold and 22 total medals, earning them the World Aquatics Team Trophy for the competition.

Mecklenburg also sent a number of swimmers to the U.S. Junior National Championships at the beginning of the month, including Eliza Wallace, who was an ‘A’ final in the 50 breast (31.99) and 100 breast (1:09.62), placing 5th and 6th, respectively.

About Competitor Swim

Since 1960, Competitor Swim® has been the leader in the production of racing lanes and other swim products for competitions around the world. Competitor lane lines have been used in countless NCAA Championships, as well as 10 of the past 13 Olympic Games. Molded and assembled using U.S. – made components, Competitor lane lines are durable, easy to set up and are sold through distributors and dealers worldwide.

Competitor Swim is a SwimSwam partner. 

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Competitor Coach of the Month: Sean Quinn

Comparison of AI Adoption: A Case Study of GM versus Toyota in the 1980s by 2 MIT Professors

0

On October 20, 1984, The New York Times ran an article headlined, “GM Factory of the Future Will Run with Robots.” In it, Roger Smith, then GM’s CEO, claimed that automation would save the company from increasingly formidable Asian competitors.

But that didn’t happen. Smith’s robotic factories struggled to match the productivity of their human-run counterparts. Robots sometimes painted each other instead of cars or welded doors shut. And they carried much higher costs.

Today, the assembly of automobiles and countless other products is done primarily by robots. Smith had the right idea; he just went about it the wrong way. Artificial intelligence poses a similar challenge.

A recent report by our colleagues at MIT suggests that despite the $30 billion-$40 billion currently being invested in enterprise AI, 95% of pilots are getting zero return. Just as automation ultimately changed manufacturing, AI will undoubtedly reshape how companies operate; however, GM’s experience highlights the pitfalls of not thinking about its implementation carefully. Throwing technology at problems without understanding how work gets done day-to-day is a surefire way to waste money and breed cynicism.

Take a cue from Taiichi Ohno, the engineer known as the father of the Toyota Production System. He argued for “autonomation:” or automation with a human touch. Here’s how leaders can put his insight into practice with AI:

Step one: understand how work actually gets done

One of the students we taught at MIT Sloan School of Management likes to say, “There are few ways to lose money faster than automating a process you don’t understand.” That was Smith’s first error.

Automotive assembly plants are complex environments. Every process combines formal procedures and countless local refinements to get work done. Most of these tweaks, while necessary, are invisible to people one level up, let alone the CEO.

Knowledge work is even harder to map and is often shaped by thousands of micro adjustments. Consider all the emails and hallway conversations needed to move any decision forward. Leveraging automation requires understanding both the way work is supposed to be performed and how it’s actually done.

Successfully using AI requires a similar approach. You have to understand the work, otherwise you risk creating tools that, as the MIT report concluded about current AI applications, are “…brittle, overengineered, or misaligned with actual workflows.”

Next, run targeted trials

Smith’s second mistake was going too big, too fast—trying to replace entire systems overnight rather than proceeding incrementally with small, focused experiments.

Toyota pinpointed jobs where robots could make the work better by doing things like eliminating unsafe activities and physically taxing jobs. Then they ran experiments. Safety and productivity improved without upending the whole system, which allowed them to learn how to design work that robots could do repeatably. With this knowledge in hand, using robots for the next round of changes was easier and less disruptive.

The AI analogy is clear: repetitive tasks are dull and create the mental equivalent of repetitive stress injuries. Look for processes that are predictable and repeatable. Start where boredom is high and variability is low then use these simpler automation successes as learning experiences toward automating more sophisticated, complex work.

AI will never grasp the full context of your organization or the surrounding social and political dynamics. AI only knows what it has learned from experience. You still need employees who know the work and the organization to oversee AI to make sure its learning is headed in the right direction.

Then, redeploy, don’t just reduce

There’s little doubt that AI will eventually eliminate jobs, but if your company hopes to grow and thrive, choose this as a last resort. Smith didn’t think this way. His tenure was marked by plant closures and job losses. He famously told auto workers, “Every time you ask for another dollar in wages, a thousand more robots start looking practical.”

This is misguided. The “machines versus people” dynamic has fueled labor tensions, slowed technology adoption, and hurt organizational performance for over a century. It’s also bad business. Technology should improve productivity and fuel growth, not just slash costs.

AI frees up capacity. Use this newly available bandwidth to dust off ideas that have been sitting on the shelf: new services to offer, new markets to enter, and nagging problems to finally solve. Position employees where their skills are strongest; you know them, and they know the business.

Our approach requires a strong stomach, at least initially. At first, it’ll feel too small and too slow, especially when competitors boast about “doing AI everywhere.” But as you clear away work that is easily automated, building skills along the way, and delivering returns on the AI investment, more complex challenges will appear. Rinse and repeat with the next opportunity, ensuring that AI is not just cutting costs, it is helping you redesign and grow the business.

Much as robots are everywhere in factories now, AI will find a permanent place in most organizations. Your company will get there faster and with less heartache if you understand how work gets done, start with small experiments and prioritize growth over cuts.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.