21.9 C
New York
Friday, September 19, 2025
Home Blog Page 304

Search for Madeleine McCann in Portugal continues into third day

0

Phil Mackie

Midlands correspondent

Reporting fromAlgarve, Portugal
BBC News Investigators arriving at the police checkpoint in an area between the cities of Lagos and Praia da Luz to begin the third day of their searchBBC News

Searches for Madeleine McCann resumed on Thursday near to where the three-year-old disappeared from Praia da Luz, Portugal 18 years ago.

German and Portuguese investigators have until Friday to look for evidence relating to her disappearance but there has been no obvious sign of any major discovery so far.

Officers are scouring a 21 sq km (8.1 sq miles) site between where she went missing and where the German investigators’ prime suspect, Christian Brückner, had been staying at the time.

The 48-year-old is serving a prison sentence in Germany for an unrelated rape case, however could be released as early as September.

Three-year-old Madeleine McCann vanished from an apartment in the Algarve while on holiday with her family in May 2007.

Her disappearance is one of the highest-profile missing person cases in the world.

Madeleine’s case was initially handled by the Portuguese authorities with the aid of the Metropolitan Police.

However German police took the lead in 2020 when they identified Brückner as a suspect.

He is known to have spent time in the same part of Portugal between 2000 and 2017.

German police suspect him of murder. British police continue to treat the case as a missing persons investigation.

Brückner has repeatedly denied any involvement and no charges have been brought against him relating to Madeleine’s disappearance.

A European warrant has been approved by Portuguese prosecutors to allow German teams to conduct the latest searches on private land.

Diggers and specialist equipment were brought in to help scour scrubland and abandoned buildings on Wednesday.

Searches were last carried near the Barragem do Arade reservoir in 2023 as Brückner had photographs and videos of himself in the area.

On the night Madeleine disappeared, her parents had been at dinner with friends at a restaurant a short walk away while their three-year-old daughter and her younger twin siblings were asleep in the ground-floor apartment.

Last month, Kate and Gerry McCann marked the 18th year anniversary of her disappearance, saying their “determination to leave no stone unturned is unwavering”.

However they would not comment during the “active police investigation”, staff at the Find Madeleine Campaign said.

A thin, grey banner promoting the News Daily newsletter. On the right, there is a graphic of an orange sphere with two concentric crescent shapes around it in a red-orange gradient, like a sound wave. The banner reads: "The latest news in your inbox first thing.”

Get our flagship newsletter with all the headlines you need to start the day. Sign up here.

Sharon Osbourne’s Music Industry Tips: Managing Ozzy and More

0

MBW’s World’s Greatest Managers series profiles the best artist managers in the global business. Sharon Osbourne is a star in her own right, but for more than four decades, she has also managed her husband, and true rock revolutionary, Ozzy. Here she discusses that relationship, their success, and Black Sabbath going out on a high in July. This interview originally appeared in the Q1 issue of Music Business UK, printed in March. World’s Greatest Managers is supported by Centtrip, a specialist in intelligent treasury, payments and foreign exchange – created with the music industry and its needs in mind.


Let’s take this opportunity to settle one of the biggest debates in music.

Black Sabbath were the first heavy metal band. They are, thematically and sonically, pioneers. Very few acts scheduled to headline a stadium in 2025 can claim to have defined a genre of music and paved the way for over a dozen other musicians on the same line-up.

In July, Black Sabbath’s original four members return to their hometown of Birmingham, the birthplace of heavy metal, to play their final concert at Villa Park with support from giants of the metal world: Slayer, Metallica, Pantera, Lamb Of God, Mastodon and more.

According to the concert’s musical director Tom Morello, the final reunion of Ozzy Osbourne, Tony Iommi, Geezer Butler and Bill Ward, will be “the greatest heavy metal show ever”.

For Sharon Osbourne, Ozzy’s wife and manager of more than four decades, the planning of Back To The Beginning – as the charity event has been dubbed – is “very bittersweet”.

“It’s been our lives together for 45 years,” she says of hers and Ozzy’s storied careers in music. “It’s great, but it’s sad at the same time,” she adds of her feelings about the final show.  “But it’s definitely time to say goodnight. It’s time for Ozzy to do whatever he wants and not have to plan anything or be anywhere at any particular time.”

After guiding heavy music’s original provocateur to solo megastardom, Sharon Osbourne built an empire across music management, festivals (Ozzfest between 1996–2018) and television (The Osbournes, The Sharon Osbourne Show etc). She’s also a best-selling author and was a judge on multiple series of hit talent shows America’s Got Talent and the UK’s The X Factor.

Osbourne was, in her own words, “born into the industry”.

She witnessed the birth of the rock‘n’roll business in London in the 1960s as the daughter of infamous music executive Don Arden – who worked with stars from Gene Vincent to Jerry Lee Lewis, and later Electric Light Orchestra, Black Sabbath and more.

“I just saw something in Ozzy. I saw that spark that he had. It was electric.”

“I watched my father go from an artist himself, to an agent, to a manager to running his own record label [Jet Records]. I worked for him for several years,” Osbourne says.

“I learned everything I knew from my father. I watched him make terrible mistakes, and I learned a lot of good things and also things that you just don’t do in the industry. I was like an apprentice. I learned it all from him, good and bad, because I definitely have my father’s temper, but I don’t take other people’s money!”

The first artist Sharon managed on her own was guitar player Gary Moore, but would later go on to manage Ozzy’s solo career by herself after his split from Black Sabbath in 1979.  “I started with Gary, and I was doing day-to-day management for ELO at the time,” she explains.

“And I just saw something in Ozzy. I saw that spark that he had. It was electric. Ozzy would walk into a room, and everybody would look at him. In two minutes, he had everybody laughing on the floor.  He was a very charismatic young man. I just believed in it.”

That belief manifested into significant success. Ozzy’s first solo album Blizzard Of Ozz (1980), featuring the classically trained late great Randy Rhoads on guitar and co-songwriting duties, has sold over six million copies worldwide, hit No.21 on the US album chart and included iconic tracks like Crazy Train and Mr. Crowley.

“It just exploded,” Sharon recalls of Ozzy’s transition from Sabbath frontman to solo star in 1980. “As soon as Crazy Train came out on the radio, it was just instant. Ozzy was blessed.”

Ozzy has since sold over 100 million albums worldwide across his work with Black Sabbath and his 13 solo studio albums. His most recent LP, the Andrew Watt-produced Patient Number 9 (Epic), hit No.3 on the US album chart and won the Grammy for Best Rock Album in 2023. He also won Best Metal Performance that year for Degradation Rules (feat. Tony Iommi).



Asked about the legacy she hopes to leave in the music business as she prepares for Ozzy’s last ever live performance, Osbourne responds: “I’m not important. Managers are on the coat-tails of their artists. It’s about what Sabbath leaves, and what Ozzy leaves. That’s the important thing.”

But first, Osbourne takes MBW back to the beginning of Ozzy’s solo career and weighs in on the modern music industry, superfans, big-money catalog deals and more…


How did the idea come together for Back To The Beginning?

Since Ozzy’s illness, which has been six years, he’s said his one regret is that he never got the chance to say goodbye to his fans and everybody that he’s ever worked with.

And then it was like, ‘Ok, how do we do this without Ozzy just performing for two-and-a-half hours?’, because Ozzy can’t perform for two-and-a-half hours anymore.


Credit: Dom Slike / Alamy
Black Sabbath: guitarist Tony Iommi, drummer Bill Ward, bassist Geezer Butler and vocalist Ozzy Osbourne

So then I thought of having all the bands he’s ever had relationships with perform and maybe do Sabbath songs and Ozzy songs. I started to ask really close friends, and they were like, ‘Sure, yeah.’

It became a celebration of the music. All the generations are going to be there that Sabbath and Ozzy have passed the torch down to. The only place that we could do it would have been Aston, because that’s where Ozzy was born and grew up, which is right where the Villa ground is.

There are two bands that we would have loved to have been there, but they couldn’t because they’re working that day. And that was Judas Priest, a local band, and Angus [Young] from AC/DC, because he’s always been a huge supporter of Ozzy’s.


Going back to your early career as a manager after Ozzy left Black Sabbath and you took over managing his solo career, what was your strategy for developing him as an artist?

Do you know what it was? Blind ignorance. It was like, ‘We’re gonna make it,’ And that’s it. We did whatever we had to do.  In the beginning, when we were booking Ozzy in America, the album hadn’t even come out yet. Promoters were booking him without the success of his first album.

We were talking to people in the fall, and he would be planning to tour the [following] summer. It was a long wait for these promoters, and most of them were shitting because they [were] blindly booking him.

It was fun to see it all happen. I mean, so many dates went up on sale and just sold instantly. And all of the promises that you make to a promoter, ‘Don’t worry, we’ll promote the show. We’ll do every bit of promotion to help you sell out.’ And then it just exploded. It was very organic.


Blizzard Of Ozz obviously became a huge success. You’ve written about how the sound was more commercially accessible than some of the heavier Sabbath music. Apart from the songwriting and musicianship, how much of the lore around Ozzy’s stage persona at that time played into the success of his career in those early days? And how challenging was it as his manager to handle the business side of it all?

Oh, yeah. Well, it just went from, ‘Ozzy’s the wild man’, to ‘Ozzy’s insane and kills animals’ and all of that shit. And you know all the stories: Ozzy’s cut his finger; no, he bit the head off a bat!

And so it just kind of spread. It had a life of its own. It just got bigger and more exaggerated; anything he did at that time in the industry.

We were told by our record company: one more incident in their building, one more misbehaviour, and he would be dropped. It was very funny to watch it all play out!


So that was CBS, before they became Sony?

Yeah, and the head of legal [at CBS] called me and warned me.  We used to laugh because it was so funny, going into radio stations and gigs. It was just hysterical, because people take everything literally.

Then, of course, at that time, Judas Priest had the same thing going on about the lyrics, the content of the album. You know, it’s got to be [censored]. Can you imagine today if you had to [censor] an album, every album would be fucking [censored]!


Ozzy ended up having a really long association with CBS and then Epic after CBS was sold to Sony in 1988. You presumably had a good relationship with them over the years after that?

Yeah. The thing was, the heads of the companies would change, but Ozzy’s only ever been on Epic as a solo artist. Well, Sony, and the same as Sabbath, were only on Warner Bros. We don’t like chopping and changing. It’s been the same with agents and people who work with us.

It’s the same crew of people. I’m not one of those who will go and do an album here and an album there, and shop every record company.


What’s some of the best music business advice you’ve ever been given?

Oh, God, hold on to your publishing! Never let your publishing go, until you get to the stage where you think you want to bail, and then you sell it all for a fortune.

You look at where your songs could end up; you could get a couple of million each time your song is used in an advertisement.

Other people could cover your song and have a hit with a song that wasn’t a hit for you. It’s something which, now, I know a lot of artists, they go in, and they want deals, [and the] record companies want their publishing. It’s like, ‘Fuck you, no way.’


You mentioned those who choose to sell their catalogues for a fortune. What do you think about the trend of big money deals struck by legacy artists and would you ever consider that for Ozzy’s music?

Everybody’s life is different. Artists who have worked and built a great body of work, it’s like, ‘Hey, sell it. It’s your big payday. Go for it.’ And there’s some that want to say, ‘No, I want to hand it over to my children.’


Photo: Randall Slavin

It’s whatever is right for you at that time in your life. But if you had 100% of it, you can imagine what it would be worth, instead of giving it to a publisher, and you get your whatever it is, 40-50% and they still retain the rest. It’s like, ‘Fuck them’, because publishers usually just sit there and wait for it to happen.


Have there been any deals that you either regret making or regret not making during your career?

Yeah, the biggest mistake I ever did with Ozzy was that they asked him to go and read for Pirates Of The Caribbean. I said, ‘Fuck off’. Can you imagine? He would have been so perfect in it.


Ozzfest became a big challenger in the festival market in the 1990s. I’ve read you came up with the idea because you approached Lollapalooza to book Ozzy, and they said no. What happened?

Yes, that’s right. I thought it would be so much fun [to book] him [at Lollapalooza]. And they were like, ‘No, not at all. Not for us.’ It gave me the idea of, ‘Fuck it [then], we’ll do our own metal festival’, because it didn’t exist. There were no touring metal festivals. It was the beginning; all the rest [followed]. And I’m so proud of that. We did it first, and it was an opportunity for so many younger bands to play in front of a huge crowd.


Were all the bands, labels and agents on board with the idea straight away? Or did it take some convincing?

It took a little convincing for the first one. We actually started out by doing two in one week. And everybody said, ‘Come back next year. This is huge. This is fantastic.’ And it just built and built and we did it for 20 odd years. It was amazing.


How did you approach Ozzy’s touring and live deals, especially in the early years?

We had a policy that Ozzy was never going to open for anyone. If you go out with that mindset, you better know what you’re doing.

“We had a policy that Ozzy was never going to open for anyone.”

You don’t have the cushion of saying, ‘It didn’t sell out. It’s not me, it’s them, it was badly run, and the sound system was shit!’ You’ve got to know what you’re doing because it all comes down to you.


What can the wider music business learn from rock and metal when it comes to superfans?

Longevity. You look at what goes on in our industry today, and you think, I wonder if I’m going to be hearing this music in five years’ time? It’s very disposable. You look at all the artists, and you go, ‘Ok, who’s going to be like the next Diana Ross that will be still relevant when they’re in their late seventies?’

I think half of them won’t be, I really do. I don’t think they could stand the test of time. Who is going to be the next Madonna from this lot that’s out there right now? Who’s going to be the next Rolling Stones?



Those bands you were speaking about, as far as merch goes, their logos, their names, will be on T-shirts decade after decade.

Are we gonna see a Coldplay T-shirt in 50 years walking down the road like the Stones? You know that tongue and lips will go on forever. It’s like, which one of you lot today is going to be that?

But that’s what artists have to think of with their career.  It’s not just now, now, now. It’s about the future. It goes so quick. Before you know where you are, you’re in another decade, and it’s like, ‘Am I still relevant? Am I doing too much?’

I think that a lot of the artists today are being badly managed, badly advised [and] doing too much. [They] don’t know when to take a break, take a breath, back off for a year, or two years.


On that note, do you think there is enough long-term artist development in the music industry, across management, labels, publishing?

There is no development currently at record labels. They take everything. Record labels developing [artists] doesn’t exist. A&R departments just go on the internet. That’s it. They’ll take your publishing, your merchandise and everything else, and all they do is press and distribute and stream you.

Most of the record companies own the streaming anyway and all of this about, ‘Oh, I’ve got a billion streams, it’s amazing.’ Well, you’re getting less than a fucking penny for a stream. It’s absolutely bastardising an artist’s music.


How does this all impact the role of the manager in terms of discovering and developing artists, and the risk that managers take?

Listen, managers in my day would support an artist so they didn’t have to support themselves, so they were able to write and hone their craft. You would literally put them in an apartment or a house, if it was a band, and you’d pay everything. You would invest your own money in an artist. That doesn’t happen today!

It’s a whole different way of breaking artists because of social media. You get a lot of managers out there wheeling and dealing, and a lot of managers out there that also [act as] agents, and lie about the fact that they don’t own the agency because it’s illegal to do that.

Artists used to have to gig. You used to learn your performance skills by constantly gigging to build your fanbase. And you don’t have to do that anymore. You can do it from your back garden. Just sit there and play to the dogs. And if you’re good, people pick up on it, and it’s instant.

The years of trailing around the world, trying to break territories. It’s just instant now, which is fantastic for the artists, but then you have to wait for the artist to develop their performance skills, because they didn’t have to tour and know how to work with an audience and all of that.

Even mic techniques, you get young kids today that don’t understand how to even work with a microphone. They just stand in front of it.


If there was one thing you could change about the music business, what would it be and why?

The word perpetuity should be taken out of the music industry. No record company should be allowed to take an artist’s work and own it for life. No publisher should be able to do that. Look at it this way, you go to a bank because you want to buy a house, so you get a mortgage. Now you finish paying that mortgage and then the bank says to you, ‘You’re never going to own your house.’


Photo: Ross Halfin

That is the thing that happens to an artist. You go to a record company, they’ll upfront you the money to make an album. If it’s a hit, you pay back the record company, and they’ve got all their money back that they gave you for making that album, and then they owned it for life. Now, how does that work? You’ve paid them back. Everybody’s made a profit, the artist, the record company, but yet you still own my work.


Have you not seen deal terms improve a lot from the 1980s to the 1990s to the 2000s to now?

Yes, of course. But you will always get kids that come along who have got the dream. They don’t care about the money, they don’t care about anything. They don’t understand the business. They just want to release their music.

They want to be a true artist. Record companies [and] publishers will always take advantage of them. Look at all these boybands that have come and gone in the past. Look at how they were all abused and taken advantage of. It can be a really tough business.


What does the future hold for the traditional record industry?

They’ve all got to stop being so arrogant and realise that it is very easy for artists to do it themselves. They’ve just got to think for their futures. Some of my best friends are still at record companies. But you look at what [some] record companies are doing today, they’re hideous.

I’ve heard certain people [at] some of the biggest record labels in the world turn around and say, ‘We have to fuck the artist before they fuck us.’

It’s such huge instant money that you can make in this industry, and it’s very cut-throat. But more power to those kids that want to go out there and do it all themselves.


A specialist in intelligent treasury, payments and foreign exchange, Centtrip works with over 500 global artists helping them and their crew maximise their income and reduce touring costs with its award-winning multi-currency card and market-leading exchange rates. Centtrip also offers record labels, promoters, collection societies and publishers a more cost-effective way to send payments across the globe.Music Business Worldwide

Security Forces Kill Mehran Samak for Celebrating Iran’s World Cup Elimination

0

The Iranian national team has toed a fine line between expressing support for protesters back home and risking serious repercussions from the regime for doing so. They have been criticized for not being more vocal about the regime’s violent suppression of dissent on the world stage, the Associated Press reported. Some also called out Ezatolahi for failing to mention that Samak was killed by security forces.

The team also faced criticism early on for meeting with and bowing to President Ebrahim Raisi before they traveled to Qatar for the World Cup. During the competition, however, the players appeared to cautiously express solidarity with protesters back home.

Ahead of its first match, team captain Ehsan Hajsafi acknowledged the oppression of Iranians back home, saying the “conditions in our country are not right.”

“We are here, but it does not mean that we should not be their voice or we must not respect them,” he said.

The teammates also stayed silent as the Iranian national anthem played at their first match against England, in what many interpreted as a show of support to protesters.

They were later threatened by the members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and told their families would face “violence and torture” if they participated in any political protest against the government, CNN reported, citing an anonymous source.

The team joined in singing the national anthem in their other two games, against Wales and then the US.

UK fintech Wise to move primary listing to New York

0

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

UK fintech Wise plans to switch its primary listing to New York in an attempt to attract more investors and boost its valuation, dealing a fresh blow to the London market.

The company, which listed to great fanfare in London in 2021, said the move would increase its appeal to US investors and enhance its expansion plans in the world’s biggest economy.

Announcing the decision on Thursday, Wise said: “We believe the addition of a primary US listing would help us accelerate our mission and bring substantial strategic and capital market benefits to Wise and our owners.”

Founded in London in 2010 by Estonians Kristo Käärmann and Taavet Hinrikus, about a fifth of the company’s staff are based in the UK. Its decision to go public in London rather than New York was hailed as a rare coup for the UK market.

Wise began as a provider of money transfers that undercut banks but has recently expanded its services to include interest-yielding investment products and a debit card.

Wise said the decision to shift its primary listing to New York would be put to a shareholder vote. The company intends to retain a listing in London.

The decision by Wise is likely to fuel anxieties over the appeal of the London market, which has historically struggled to compete with Wall Street.

Construction equipment rental group Ashtead in December announced plans to move its listing to New York, saying that the US was its biggest market.

Women’s 4x200m Freestyle Relay: The Breakdown

0

2025 U.S. NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS

WOMEN’S 200 Freestyle – Final

Results:

  1. Claire Weinstein (SAND) – 1:54.92
  2. Katie Ledecky (GSC) – 1:55.26
  3. Torri Huske (AAC) – 1:55.71
  4. Anna Peplowski (ISC)/Erin Gemmell (TXLA) – 1:55.82
  5. Bella Sims (SAND) – 1:57.18
  6. Simone Manuel (TXLA) – 1:57.44
  7. Isabel Ivey (GSC) – 1:58.05

Five women broke 1:56 tonight, as Claire Weinstein out-touched Katie Ledecky for the second time in three years. Torri Huske was out fast through 150, and managed to set a huge best time as she skipped the 1:56s entirely.

With Ariarne Titmus sitting out Worlds this season and Mollie O’Callaghan nursing a slight knee injury, they could well be the favourites to reclaim their World crown from 2022.

The top four from tonight will be guaranteed a spot, whilst fifth and sixth will need to wait to see how the team shapes up elsewhere.

So, what does all this mean for Team USA’s 4×200 free relay this summer?

The Past Is History, the Future Is a Mystery?

Last year’s Trials were only the third-fastest ever – the first one we’ve seen so far that was not the fastest. The 200 free add-ups in 2016 and 2023 were faster, although their fastest two relay times have come in 2021 and 2024.

Here was what the gaps looked like between the add-up from the top four at Nationals and the relay times swum later that summer since 2000.

We love to predict how relays will perform before a major summer meet. There are almost no other real opportunities for a top-tier long course relay team to compete, so there’s limited data to go off.

Based on the U.S. Nationals results we’ve built a rough model to predict the final time for the American 4×100 free relay this summer. To calculate this we’ve considered the National Championship results (top four), previous history of the drops from Nationals to the relay in the summer, and the raw times themselves.

The past four years look something like this:

Year Trials Add-up Predicted Time Range (90% confidence band*) Range (50% confidence band) Actual Relay Time
2021 7:45.86 7:43.66 7:42.53 – 7:44.87 7:43.14 – 7:44.12 7:40.73
2022 7:47.20 7:44.68 7:43.61 – 7:45.91 7:44.18- 7:45.09 7:41.45
2023 7:42.85 7:41.46 7:39.80 – 7:42.60 7:41.00 – 7:42.11 7:41.38
2024 7:44.51 7:42.67 7:41.36 – 7:43.87 7:42.15 – 7:43.20 7:40.86

*This defines the upper and lower limits of a range in which we would be 90% sure that the result would fall – if this was raced 100 times, in 90 of those we’d expect a time in this range.

First things first, the model does have some limitations. It is only intended as a ballpark figure and the 90% and 50% confidence bands are too confident, especially for the last few years where the actual drops have ranged anywhere from 0.88 seconds to 2.92 seconds.

Overall though, we’re not looking for this to give us an absolute relay time to hold ourselves to for the summer – just a range which we (or you) can debate. Without further ado, here are all the numbers from this year’s trials you need to worry about.

The Numbers

 

Fastest three flat-start times of the top-six:

 

Fastest senior international three relay splits of the top six:

 

Fastest flat-start add-up:

 

Fastest flat start + relay split add-up:

Katie Ledecky is unlikely to be at 1:53 pace, and Bella Sims was a little off her 1:55-mid best from 2022, so these are not wholly representative. However, the relays have seemed to step up big over the last Olympic quad, so potentially a Sub-7:40 is not out of the question

As a final look ahead, here are the U.S. Nationals/Trials to summer relay drops since 2000 based on location. The circles get darker as the year gets later, and any hollow circles indicate a negative drop – that is, an increase.

 

 

Vietnam Abandons Two-Child Policy in Effort to Address Declining Birthrate | Demographics Update

0

Vietnam’s declining birthrate is most pronounced in urban areas, while nationally, male births still outnumber female.

Vietnam has scrapped its longstanding two-child policy as it aims to reverse its declining birthrate and ease the pressure from an ageing society.

All restrictions were removed this week, and couples will be free to have as many children as they choose, according to Vietnamese media.

Minister of Health Dao Hong Lan said that a future shrinking population “threatens Vietnam’s sustainable economic and social development, as well as its national security and defence in the long term,” the Hanoi Times reported.

Between 1999 and 2022, Vietnam’s birthrate was about 2.1 children per woman, the replacement rate needed to keep the population from shrinking, but the rate has started to fall, the news outlet said.

In 2024, the country’s birthrate reached a record low of 1.91 children per woman.

Regional neighbours like Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong all have declining birthrates, but their economies are more advanced than Vietnam’s.

Vietnam’s working-age population is expected to peak around 2040, according to the World Bank, and it aims to avoid the trap of “getting old before it gets rich”.

The country’s communist government introduced the two-child policy in 1988 to ensure it had adequate resources as it transitioned from a planned to a market economy. At the time, Vietnam was also still overcoming the effects of decades of war.

Newborn babies at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Hanoi, Vietnam, in 2022 [Nhac Nguyen/AFP]

Vietnam’s two-child policy was most strictly enforced with members of Vietnam’s Communist Party, according to the Associated Press, but families everywhere could lose out on government subsidies and assistance if they had a third or fourth child.

As well as a declining birthrate, Vietnam is also facing significant imbalances across different regions and social groups, the Ministry of Health said.

The declining birthrate is most pronounced in urban areas such as Ho Chi Minh and the capital Hanoi, where the cost of living is highest. But there are also significant disparities in gender. Last year, Vietnam’s sex ratio at birth was 111 boys to every 100 girls.

The disparity between male and female births is most pronounced in North Vietnam’s Red River Delta and the Northern Midlands and Mountains, according to the World Bank, and lowest in the Central Highlands and Mekong River Delta.

Vietnam prohibits doctors from telling parents the sex of their children to curb sex-selective abortions, but the practice continues, with doctors communicating via coded words, according to Vietnamese media.

Left unchecked, the General Statistics Office warned there could be a “surplus of 1.5 million men aged 15-49 by 2039, rising to 2.5 million by 2059”.

In a bid to reverse this trend, the Health Ministry separately proposed tripling the fine for “foetal gender selection” to about $3,800.

Akkodis at the Paris Air Show 2025: Leading the Way in Sustainable and Digital Innovation with AI

0


AI and Sustainability: Akkodis showcases the future of sustainable and digital innovation at the Paris Air Show 2025

Musk denounces Trump’s tax bill as a ‘disgusting abomination’

0

Elon Musk hit out at President Donald Trump’s signature tax and spending bill again on Wednesday, calling on Americans to tell their representatives in Washington to “kill the bill”.

The budget, which includes huge tax breaks and more defence spending, was passed by the House of Representatives last month and is now being considered by senators.

The tech billionaire posted on X earlier this week that the bill would add to the US budget deficit and saddle Americans with “crushing” debt.

On Tuesday, he described it as a “disgusting abomination”, in a widening rift between the two.

The bill has the backing of President Donald Trump and would be the legislative linchpin of his second-term agenda if it passes Congress.

“Shame on those who voted for it,” said Musk on Tuesday, hinting that he may try to unseat the politicians responsible at next year’s midterm elections.

Musk left the administration abruptly last week after 129 days working to cut costs with his team, known as Doge. The comments mark his first public disagreement with Trump since leaving government, after having previously called the plan “disappointing”.

Soon after Musk’s tweet on Wednesday, the White House sent out a “myth buster” statement, calling any assertion that the bill would lead to higher deficits a “hoax”.

“By every honest metric, President Donald J. Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill dramatically improves the fiscal trajectory of the United States and unleashes an era of unprecedented economic growth,” the statement reads.

It made no mention of Musk or his tweets. The BBC has contacted the White House for comment.

The South African-born tech billionaire’s time in the Trump administration came to an end on 31 May, although Trump said that “he will, always, be with us, helping all the way”.

In its current form, the bill – which Trump refers to as the “big beautiful bill” – has been estimated to increase the budget deficit – the difference between what the government spends and the revenue it receives – by about $600bn (£444bn) in the next fiscal year.

In a series of posts on X on Tuesday, Musk said that the “outrageous, pork-filled” spending bill will “massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America [sic] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt”.

In American politics “pork” refers to spending on projects in lawmakers’ constituencies.

Musk has previously vowed to fund campaign challenges against any Republican that votes against Trump’s agenda. But on Tuesday he fired a warning to those who backed the bill.

“In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,” he wrote.

Asked about Musk’s comments soon after the first post, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said “the President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill”.

“This is one, big, beautiful bill,” she added. “And he’s sticking to it.”

The legislation also pledges to extend soon-to-expire tax cuts passed during the first Trump administration in 2017, as well as an influx of funds for defence spending and to fund the administration’s mass deportations of undocumented immigrants.

To the dismay of fiscal conservatives, it would lift the limit on the amount of money the government can borrow, known as the debt ceiling, to $4tn.

The comments from Musk reflect wider tensions among Republicans over the plan, which faced stiff opposition from different wings of the party as it worked its way through the House.

The Senate has now taken it up, and divisions are already emerging in that chamber, which is also narrowly controlled by Republicans.

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has said over the last few days he will not support the bill if it raises the debt ceiling.

“The GOP [the Republican Party] will own the debt once they vote for this,” he told CBS News, the BBC’s US partner, over the weekend.

Trump responded to Paul with a series of social media posts, accusing him of having “very little understanding of the bill” and saying that the “people of Kentucky can’t stand him”.

“His ideas are actually crazy,” Trump wrote.

Republican lawmakers pushed back on Musk’s comments, with Senate majority leader John Thune saying the party plans to “proceed full speed ahead” despite “a difference of opinion”.

Thune and other senators met Trump for a “positive discussion” on Wednesday, he told reporters at the White House.

He downplayed Musk’s posts, saying it would do little to scupper the work of lawmakers.

“We are moving forward,” he said, also adding that “the wheels are in motion,” and that “failure is not an option”.

Mike Johnson – the Republican Speaker who has ushered the legislation through the House – told reporters on Capitol Hill that “my friend Elon is terribly wrong”.

“It’s a very important first start. Elon is missing it,” Johnson said.

Johnson said he had a 20-minute phone call with the tycoon about the bill on Monday, adding that its phasing out of electric vehicle tax credits could “have an effect” on Tesla, Musk’s firm.

“I lament that,” Johnson said, expressing surprise that Musk criticised the bill despite their call. “I just deeply regret he’s made this mistake.”

Among the issues that upset Musk involved air traffic control at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), according to Axios.

Musk was hoping it would be run on his Starlink satellite system, but he was denied because of issues relating to the technology and the appearance of a conflict of interest, the political outlet reported.

Some Democrats welcomed Musk’s comments despite their previous criticism of him and the work of Doge.

“Even Elon Musk, who’s been part of the whole process, and is one of Trump’s buddies, said the bill is bad,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. “We can imagine how bad this bill is.”

Trump and Republicans in Congress have set a deadline of 4 July to get the measure passed and signed into law.

Musk supported Trump in last year’s November election with donations of more than $250m.

To make peace with spending hawks, Trump is also asking Congress to pass a plan that would reduce current spending by $9.4bn, a figure derived from Doge’s work.

It would mainly slash funding for foreign aid, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and for broadcasters NPR and PBS.

Trump reinstates travel ban, preventing entry from Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iran, Sudan, Yemen and additional 7 countries

0

President Donald Trump is resurrecting the travel ban policy from his first term, signing a proclamation Wednesday night preventing people from a dozen countries from entering the United States.

The countries include Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.

In addition to the ban, which takes effect at 12:01 a.m. Monday, there will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.

“I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people,” Trump said in his proclamation.

The list results from a Jan. 20 executive order Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on “hostile attitudes” toward the U.S. and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk.

During his first term, Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries — Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travelers from those nations were either barred from getting on their flights to the U.S. or detained at U.S. airports after they landed. They included students and faculty as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family.

The order, often referred to as the “Muslim ban” or the “travel ban,” was retooled amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.

The ban affected various categories of travelers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families.

Trump and others have defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was aimed at protecting the country and not founded on anti-Muslim bias. However, the president had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

United States Blocks U.N. Resolution Calling for Gaza Cease-Fire

0

new video loaded: U.S. Vetoes U.N. Resolution for Gaza Cease-Fire

transcript

transcript

U.S. Vetoes U.N. Resolution for Gaza Cease-Fire

The U.S. was the only member nation to veto the U.N. Security Council resolution. The resolution also sought the release of all the hostages and the continuation of full-scale aid deliveries.

“The result of the voting is as follows: 14 votes in favor, one vote against, zero abstentions. The draft resolution has not been adopted owing, to the negative vote of a permanent member of the council.” “The United States has taken the very clear position since this conflict began that Israel has a right to defend itself, which includes defeating Hamas and ensuring they are never again in a position to threaten Israel. In this regard, any product that undermines our close ally Israel’s security is a non-starter.”

Recent episodes in Middle East