-5.1 C
New York
Thursday, February 5, 2026
Home Blog Page 19

Drake challenges rejection of ‘Not Like Us’ lawsuit against UMG, claims court established risky precedent for rap diss songs

0

Three months ago, a federal judge dismissed Drake’s defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group over Kendrick Lamar’s Not Like Us.

Now, the superstar rapper is appealing the decision.

Drake filed a 117-page appellate brief on January 21 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, seeking to overturn Judge Jeannette Vargas’s October ruling that dismissed all of his claims.

He originally filed the lawsuit in January 2025, about eight months after Not Like Us was released in May 2024. Drake alleged that UMG “intentionally published and promoted” the song, while knowing that the song’s lyrics “were false and defamatory”.

Lamar’s Not Like Us was part of what Judge Jeannette Vargas described as “perhaps the most infamous rap battle in the genre’s history.”

Over 16 days, Drake and Lamar released eight diss tracks with increasingly inflammatory rhetoric.

Not Like Us achieved extraordinary commercial success, accumulating over 1.8 billion streams on Spotify alone to date, and winning Record of the Year at the 2025 Grammys. It was performed during the 2025 Super Bowl Halftime Show to 133.5 million viewers.

Judge Vargas ruled that the diss track “constitutes protected opinion rather than actionable defamation”.

Drake’s appeal directly challenges that conclusion.

The brief argues that “The District Court Created a Dangerous Categorical Rule that rap diss tracks can never be actionable.”

It also claims that “millions of people understood the Recording and Image to convey factual information, causing countless individuals around the globe to believe that Drake was a pedophile.”

Drake’s brief filed this week contends that Judge Vargas made an error by considering the song only within the context of the entire rap battle between Drake and Kendrick Lamar.

His lawyers argue that “of all the songs published during the rap beef, the Recording is the only one that ‘broke through the noise’ and achieved cultural ubiquity.”

By contrast, the next-most-popular song in the feud, Euphoria, had “just 4.1%” of the streams and views achieved by Not Like Us, according to data cited in the filing.

The brief argues the song was repeatedly “republished” to massive new audiences who had no knowledge of any rap battle, including at the Democratic National Convention and the Grammy Awards, where it won Record of the Year.

“Millions who tuned in to the ‘Big Game’ – including young children and people whose religious or cultural beliefs, or simply their taste in music, leave them with no interest in or exposure to rap battles – were unaware of the feud and ‘had never before heard the [Recording] or any of the songs that preceded it,’” the filing states.

Drake’s lawyers argue that the district court “effectively created an unprecedented and overbroad categorical rule that statements in rap diss tracks can never constitute statements of fact.”

The appeal also revives Drake’s claim that UMG used deceptive business practices to artificially boost the song’s success.

The brief alleges that “notwithstanding its knowledge of the falsity of the allegations and the threats to Drake and his family’s safety, UMG waged an unrelenting campaign to spread the Recording as widely as possible.”

Following the dismissal in October, a UMG spokesperson said: “From the outset, this suit was an affront to all artists and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day. We’re pleased with the court’s dismissal and look forward to continuing our work successfully promoting Drake’s music and investing in his career.”

In May, when the company filed its motion to dismiss, UMG characterized Drake’s allegations as “wild conspiracies” and described the lawsuit as “Drake’s attempt to save face for his unsuccessful rap battle with Lamar.”

MBW has reached out to UMG for a response to the most recent filing.Music Business Worldwide

National All-American Teams for High School in 2025

0

Congratulations to MAX Field Hockey’s 2025 High School National All-American Teams!
[View the 2025 High School All-Region First and Second Teams]


FIRST TEAM


 

ELLA BEACH
Glenbrook North High School (IL)
Senior – Midfield

REBECCA BLOCK
The Episcopal Academy (PA)
Senior – Midfield

KATY CHAPMAN
John Burroughs School (MO)
Senior – Midfield

LILLY CIMAROLI
New Trier High School (IL)
Senior – Midfield

CAITLIN CONNELL
Villa Maria Academy (PA)
Senior – Forward

ADELAIDE COSSE MINNELLA
West Essex High School (NJ)
Senior – Forward

GRACEY CRAWFORD
St. John’s School (TX)
Senior – Midfield

SOFIA FERRI
The Hill School (PA)
Senior – Defense

AIDA IERUBINO
Central Bucks West High School (PA)
Senior – Forward/Midfield

ANNA CLAIRE KOSEK
Sacred Heart Academy (KY)
Senior – Midfield/Forward

MORGAN LALA
Christian Academy of Louisville (KY)
Senior – Goalkeeper

MAEVE MCGINLEY
Academy of Notre Dame de Namur (PA)
Junior – Forward/Midfield

LILLY MCMAHON
Oak Knoll School (NJ)
Senior – Midfield/Forward

REESE MILONE
Academy of Notre Dame de Namur (PA)
Senior – Forward/Midfield

BREE MOFFETT
Smyrna High School (DE)
Senior – Midfield

KIERA SACK
Academy of Notre Dame de Namur (PA)
Senior – Forward/Midfield

JACK SHAW
Villa Maria Academy (PA)
Junior – Midfield

CHASE STROHM
Lower Dauphin High School (PA)
Junior – Forward/Midfield

KIRA TRADER
Tabb High School (VA)
Senior – Forward

MELINA VOLIOTIS
Oak Knoll School (NJ)
Junior – Midfield/Defense


SECOND TEAM


AMELIA BLOOD
Uxbridge High School (MA)
Senior – Midfield

SOPHIA BORGHESE
Thomas Worthington High School (OH)
Senior – Forward

ALEXANDRA CURTIS
Collegiate School (VA)
Junior – Forward

HALEY ELLIOTT
The Hill School (VA)
Junior – Midfield

ADRIANA ENSANI
Cardinal Gibbons High School (NC)
Senior – Forward/Midfield

MONTGOMERY FERGUSON
St. John’s School (TX)
Senior – Midfield

ELLA GANDY
Clearview Regional High School (NJ)
Senior – Midfield/Forward

KENDALL GILMORE
Uxbridge High School (MA)
Senior – Midfield

PHOEBE LAFERRIERE
Oak Knoll School (NJ)
Junior – Forward

LILAH-GRACE LOGAN
Trinity Episcopal School (VA)
Senior – Midfield

CAMILLA LUTTE
Academy of Notre Dame de Namur (PA)
Sophomore – Forward/Midfield

JOSEFINA MOLINARI
Connelly School of the Holy Child (MD)
Junior – Forward/Midfield

MOLLY NUSSBAUMER
Cardinal Gibbons High School (NC)
Senior – Forward

JACKIE O’DONNELL
The Kinkaid School (TX)
Senior – Midfield/Defense

MORGAN O’DONNELL
Avon Grove High School (PA)
Senior – Midfield

ANNA RIESSER
Trinity Episcopal School (VA)
Senior – Defense

EMERSON ROSS
Notre Dame Prep (MD)
Senior – Defense

CATHERINE ROSSER
The Kinkaid School (TX)
Senior – Goalkeeper

SOPHIA STAZI
Camden Catholic High School (NJ)
Junior – Forward/Midfield

MARIN STEFANELLI
Shore Regional High School (NJ)
Junior – Defense


THIRD TEAM


ANNA ARNOLD
St. John’s College High School (DC)
Senior – Midfield/Forward

AVA BOLAND
St. Mary’s Annapolis (MD)
Junior – Midfield/Forward

MAREN BOYLE
Phillips Academy Andover (MA)
Senior – Forward

LOLA CONWAY
The Bishop’s School (CA)
Sophomore – Midfield

KARYS CRAVER
Warwick High School (PA)
Senior – Forward/Midfield

ABIGAIL GIUSTO
Independence High School (VA)
Junior – Forward/Midfield

GENEVIEVE HUSTON
Whitney Point High School (NY)
Senior – Forward/Midfield

MADISON LENIG
Emmaus High School (PA)
Junior – Midfield

LILY MCCLAY
Fairfield Ludlowe High School (CT)
Sophomore – Midfield

LILLIAN MITCHELL
Dexter High School (MI)
Senior – Midfield

LILY MITCHELL
Leonardtown High School (MD)
Senior – Midfield/Defense

LIBERTY OLIVETTI
Mechanicsburg Area High School (PA)
Junior – Midfield/Forward

MORGANN OROBONO
Emmaus High School (PA)
Senior – Defense

MONICA PICCIOLI
Assumption High School (KY)
Senior – Defense/Midfield

EMILY ROMANO
Emmaus High School (PA)
Junior – Goalkeeper

MADELYNN STAHL
Palmyra Area High School (PA)
Sophomore – Forward/Midfield

LILA STILLEY
Moses Brown School (RI)
Senior – Defense/Midfield

CATE TORTOLANI
Bryn Mawr School (MD)
Junior – Midfield

ELIZABETH TRANT
Poquoson High School (VA)
Senior – Midfield/Forward

HOLLAND WILKINS
Charlotte Country Day School (NC)
Junior – Forward/Midfield

The post 2025 High School National All-American Teams appeared first on MAX Field Hockey.

Trump confirms US monitoring Iran as large fleet moves towards Gulf region | Latest update on Donald Trump’s stance on Iran

0

US president says ‘big force going towards Iran’, but he would ‘rather not see anything happen’ as tension with Tehran ratchets up.

United States President Donald Trump said a US naval “armada” was heading towards the Gulf region, with Iran being the focus, as officials said an aircraft carrier strike group and other assets would arrive in the Middle East in the coming days.

“We’re watching Iran,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One on Thursday as he flew back from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

“We have a big force going towards Iran,” Trump said.

“I’d rather not see anything happen, but we’re watching them very closely,” he said.

“And maybe we won’t have to use it … we have a lot of ships going that direction, just in case, we have a big flotilla going in that direction, and we’ll see what happens,” he added.

Trump’s announcement on the US naval buildup comes after he appeared to back-pedal last week on his threats of military action against Iran after, he said, receiving assurances that no executions of protesters would be carried out by Tehran.

Trump’s confirmation of continuing military preparations in the region follows after US media reports in the past week that the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier and its strike group of vessels were ordered to divert from manoeuvres in the South China Sea to the Middle East.

Speaking on Thursday, Trump reiterated that his earlier threats to use force against Tehran had stopped authorities in Iran from executing more than 800 protesters, and he again said he was open to talking with the country’s leadership.

 

Iranian officials have denied plans to execute people who had taken part in the widespread antigovernment protests that began in late December and which Iranian state media said left 3,117 people dead, including 2,427 civilians and members of the security forces.

Speaking to US broadcaster CNBC on Wednesday, Trump said he hoped there would not be further US military action against Iran, but also said the US would act if Tehran resumed its nuclear programme.

“They can’t do the ​nuclear,” Trump told CNBC in an interview in Davos.

“If they do it, it’s going to happen again,” the president said, referring to US air ‌strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities in June 2025 when Washington joined Israel’s 12-day war on the country.

Washington last ordered a major military build-up in the Middle East in advance of ‍its attacks in June, and officials later boasted about how it had kept its intention to strike Tehran’s nuclear programme a secret at the time.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal newspaper on Tuesday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned the US that Tehran will be “firing back with everything we have” if attacked.

“Our powerful armed forces have no qualms about firing back with everything we have if we come under renewed attack,” the minister wrote.

Araghchi said his warning was not a threat, “but a reality I feel I need to convey explicitly, because as a diplomat and a veteran, I abhor war”.

“An all-out confrontation will certainly be ferocious and drag on far, far longer than the fantasy timelines that Israel and its proxies are trying to peddle to the White House,” he said.

“It will certainly engulf the wider region and have an impact on ordinary people around the globe,” he added.

Challenging Client

0



Client Challenge



JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

Trump’s claim that Nato troops avoided Afghanistan front line ignites controversy and anger

0

Watch: Labour and Conservative MPs criticise Trump Afghanistan remarks

Donald Trump has sparked fresh outrage in the UK after saying Nato troops stayed “a little off the front lines” during the war in Afghanistan.

Labour MP Emily Thornberry, the chair of the foreign affairs committee, called it an “absolute insult” to the 457 British service personnel killed in the conflict, while Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: “How dare he question their sacrifice?”

Conservative MP Ben Obese-Jecty, who served in Afghanistan, said it was “sad to see our nation’s sacrifice, and that of our Nato partners, held so cheaply”.

The UK was among several allies to join the US in Afghanistan from 2001, after it invoked Nato’s collective security clause following the 9/11 terror attacks.

The US president told Fox News on Thursday that he was “not sure” the military alliance would be there for America “if we ever needed them”.

“We’ve never needed them,” he said, adding: “We have never really asked anything of them.”

“They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan,” he said, “and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines”.

He said the US had “been very good to Europe and to many other countries”, adding: “It has to be a two-way street.”

Getty Images Donald Trump arriving at Zurich airport ahead of Davos visit on 21 January 2026 Getty Images

Thornberry told the BBC’s Question Time that the remarks were “much more than a mistake”.

“It’s an absolute insult… How dare he say we weren’t on the front line, how dare he?

“We have always been there whenever the Americans have wanted us,” she said, calling Trump “a man who has never seen any action” but was now “commander in chief and knows nothing about how it is that America has been defended”.

She said the US was the UK’s “friend” but its leader had “behaved in a way that is bullying, rude, that has deliberately been trying to undermine us, which has been trying to undermine Nato.”

On the same programme, Conservative shadow cabinet member Stuart Andrew also called the comments “disgraceful” and “appalling”.

“There are many people in this country who served both in Iraq and Afghanistan, many of whom lost their lives, but also many more who came back with life-changing injuries and we should say thank you to them.”

He added that the UK-US special relationship was important for both defence and security, and that in recent weeks Trump had directed conversation to the security of the Arctic – where he said there was a “very serious threat”.

PA Media UK troops dressed in uniform and walking in a line while leaving Camp Bastion in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 27 October 2014.PA Media

457 British service personnel were killed in the conflict in Afghanistan

Sir Ed wrote on social media that Trump had “avoided military service”, adding: “How dare he question their sacrifice?”

Speaking to BBC’s Newsnight programme, Dutch foreign minister David van Weel rejected Trump’s remarks as “false”, saying “Europeans shed blood” in support of US troops in Afghanistan.

He said Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte had rebuffed similar comments Trump made earlier, during a joint press conference the pair held at Davos on Thursday.

Asked about the US president repeating the claim, van Weel, said: “We should speak out for the truth as Mark Rutte did. And if he repeated it, we need to repeat it again because that’s not how history went.”

Meanwhile, former British Army officer Obese-Jecty said it was “sad to see our nation’s sacrifice, and that of our Nato partners, held so cheaply by the president of the United States”.

“I saw first hand the sacrifices made by British soldiers,” he wrote on X.

“I don’t believe US military personnel share the view of President Trump; his words do them a disservice as our closest military allies.”

Calvin Bailey, a Labour MP and former RAF officer who served alongside US special operations units in Afghanistan, said the president’s claim bore “no resemblance to the reality experienced by those of us who served there”.

“As I reminded the US Forces I served with on 4 July 2008, we were there because of a shared belief, articulated at America’s founding, that free people have inalienable rights and should not live under tyranny,” he told the PA news agency.

“That belief underpinned the response to 9/11, and it is worth reflecting on now.”

The BBC approached the Ministry of Defence for comment.

A spokesperson pointed to comments made by Defence Secretary John Healey while visiting Nato ally Denmark on Wednesday – before Trump’s comments.

He said: “In Afghanistan, our forces trained together, they fought together, and on some occasions, they died together, making the ultimate sacrifice.”

The US invaded in October 2001 to oust the Taliban, whom they said were harbouring Osama Bin Laden and other al-Qaeda figures linked to the 9/11 attacks. Nato nations contributed troops and military equipment to the US-led war.

More than 3,500 coalition soldiers had died as of 2021, when the US withdrew from the country – about two-thirds of them Americans.

The UK suffered the second highest number of military deaths in the conflict behind the US, which saw 2,461 deaths.

The US is the only country to have invoked the collective security provisions of Nato’s Article 5, which states that “an armed attack against one Nato member shall be considered an attack against them all”.

Air Lease Corporation Form 13G Filed on 22 January

0


Form 13G AIR LEASE CORPORATION For: 22 January

US Threatens Action Against Haitian Council for Not Complying with Regulations | Government News

0

The United States has issued a warning to Haiti’s Transitional Presidential Council, writing that it would consider action should the temporary governing body compromise the Caribbean nation’s security.

In a sternly worded social media post on Thursday, the US embassy in Haiti maintained that its goal was the “establishment of baseline security and stability”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“The US would regard any effort to change the composition of the government by the non-elected Transitional Presidential Council at this late stage in its tenure (set to expire on February 7) to be an effort to undermine that objective,” Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau wrote.

He added that the US would respond if such changes to the council were to occur. His statement, however, failed to identify the precise circumstances that prompted the warning.

“The US would consider anyone supporting such a disruptive step favoring the gangs to be acting contrary to the interests of the United States, the region, and the Haitian people and will act accordingly,” Landau said.

Haiti continues to struggle with the ravages of widespread gang violence, instability and corruption in its government.

But the US threat is likely to send shudders throughout the region, particularly in the aftermath of the January 3 attack on Venezuela.

The administration of President Donald Trump has repeatedly advanced the notion that the entire Western Hemisphere falls under its sphere of influence, as part of a policy it dubbed the “Donroe Doctrine”, a riff on the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine.

Trump has referenced that premise to justify the use of US military force to abduct Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, as well as to claim the US needs to control Greenland.

A political crisis

Located some 11,000 kilometres (800 miles) southeast of the US, Haiti has long struggled with instability. It is considered the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere, as it continues to suffer from the legacy of foreign intervention, dictatorship and natural disasters.

But in 2021, the country faced a new crisis when President Jovenel Moise was assassinated in his home in the capital, Port-au-Prince.

Federal elections have not been held since, leading to a crisis of confidence in the government. The last federally elected officials saw their terms expire in 2023.

Experts say the lack of leadership has allowed Haiti’s gangs to flourish, and since the Moise assassination, they have taken control of vast stretches of the territory, including up to 90 percent of the capital.

The resulting violence has forced more than 1.4 million Haitians from their homes. Millions more suffer from food insecurity, as thoroughfares are often restricted by gang-led roadblocks.

This week, a United Nations report found that, between January and November of last year, an estimated 8,100 people were killed in the violence. That marks an escalation from 2024, when the yearly total was 5,600.

But efforts have been made to restore the country’s stability. The Transitional Presidential Council was designed as a temporary governing structure to set the framework for new federal elections. Established in 2024, it has nine members who rotate to serve as chair.

Very quickly, however, the council faced criticism for its membership – largely selected from the country’s business and political elite – and allegations of corruption swirled. Infighting has also broken out among the members.

The US too has added to the tensions on the council. In November, it announced visa restrictions against an unnamed government official, later identified in the media as one of the council’s members, economist Fritz Alphonse Jean.

While the council had been slated to hold tiered elections starting last November, it failed to meet that benchmark, and the first vote has been postponed to August.

In the meantime, the council’s mandate is set to dissolve on February 7, and the panel’s future remains unclear.

UN calls for action

In this week’s report on Haiti, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres linked Haiti’s ongoing humanitarian crisis to the vacuum in its government.

“Violence has intensified and expanded geographically, exacerbating food insecurity and instability, as transitional governance arrangements near expiry and overdue elections remain urgent,” Guterres said.

Another UN representative – Carlos Ruiz-Massieu, who leads the UN Integrated Office in Haiti (BINUH) – was also emphatic about the immediate need for transparent democratic processes and unified governance.

“Let us be clear: the country no longer has time to waste on prolonged internal struggles,” he said.

Still, in a speech on Wednesday to the UN Security Council, Ruiz-Massieu added that there have been “encouraging” signs ahead of this year’s scheduled elections. He applauded efforts to increase voter registration, including in Haiti’s diaspora, and encourage political participation among women.

But Ruiz-Massieu underscored that security concerns, including gang violence, could impede the democratic process, and that there was more work to be done before elections could be held.

“Achieving this goal will require sustained coordination among relevant institutions, predictable financing of the electoral process and security conditions that allow all voters and candidates to participate without fear,” he said.

The UN also signalled it would bolster its multinational security support mission in Haiti with more troops later this year.

Elon Musk argues that his $2.2 trillion tech empire is humanity’s best hope for survival as the only intelligent life in the universe

0

Despite Elon Musk’s multiple proclamations that he is an alien—something he reiterated on the stage of the World Economic Forum on Thursday—the billionaire SpaceX CEO thinks it’s very unlikely there is intelligent life beyond Earth.

In a conversation in Davos, Switzerland, with BlackRock CEO and World Economic Forum interim chair Larry Fink, Musk said this belief is the framework of his technology ventures and  $600 billion of wealth. Because there’s a small likelihood of life outside of Earth, Musk said the project of preserving humanity becomes more urgent.

I’m often asked, ‘Are there aliens among us?’ And I’ll say that I am one. They don’t believe me,” Musk said, unclear if he was joking or what particular point he was trying to make by asserting his alienness. 

“Or you’re from the future,” Fink responded, alluding to previous times Musk has called himself a 3,000-year-old time-travelling vampire.

“The bottom line is, I think we need to assume that life and consciousness is extremely rare and it might only be us,” Musk added. “And if that’s the case, then we need to do everything possible to ensure that the light of consciousness is not extinguished.”

Musk’s vision of protecting humanity manifested more than a decade ago, when he founded OpenAI alongside Sam Altman in 2015 with the hopes of addressing the existential risks and safety concerns associated with the budding technology. He told Fink that Tesla and SpaceX, worth $1.4 trillion and $800 billion, respectively, were an extension of this belief, with the purpose not only to create sustainable technology, but “sustainable abundance.”

Musk’s vision for the future of humanity

Musk reiterated his vision of an abundance of humanoid robotics that would make work optional, claiming technology would ease the burden of humans to have jobs or even have money.

“With robotics and AI, this is really the path to abundance for all,” Musk said. “People often talk about solving global poverty, or essentially, how do we make everyone have a very high standard of living? I think the only way to do this is AI and robotics.”

The billionaire describes a world with billions of robots—which would outnumber humans—and would serve to complete tasks including caring for children and elderly parents. He predicted that there would be functional humanoid robot technology by the end of the year, and said he expected those robots to be retail available in the next couple of years. 

To be sure, Tesla’s own Optimus robots have hit snags, continuously falling behind production schedule, with Musk saying as recently as Tuesday that manufacturing for the bots, as well as the Tesla Cybercab, would be “agonizingly slow” before production eventually ramped up.

Musk has previously said humans would be able to sustain themselves without work through a universal basic income, but did not provide details on the political steps needed to provide that income to humans.

These missions to preserve humanity extend beyond earth. Musk has described his goals as “Mars-shot,” alluding to his hopes to put human life on Mars, efforts he has even touched on in Tesla’s financial filings. The CEO has previously said he envisions Mars as an insurance policy for the future of humanity, wanting to use it as a jumping off point to expand resources to explore human consciousness.

“I’ve been asked a few times like, ‘Do I want to die on Mars?’” Musk said on Thursday. “And I’m like, ‘Yes, but just not on impact.’”

The Fermi Paradox, according to Musk

Musk’s philosophy regarding extraterrestrial life has previously engaged with the Fermi Paradox, a theory positing that there’s both a high change of intelligent life outside of earth—and scant evidence to prove it.

In 1950, Italian-American physicist Enrico Fermi, an architect of the atom bomb, asked a question in a conversation with colleagues at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico: “Where is everybody?”

The three-word inquiry launched a 1963 paper by American astronomer Carl Sagan and proliferated in the scientific community, and the popularized Fermi Paradox soon emerged.

Musk said in an X post in 2023 that humans “are the only tiny candle of consciousness in an abyss of darkness.”

“The scariest answer to the Fermi Paradox is that there are no aliens at all,” he said.

In 2022, Musk even commissioned a sculpture depicting the “Fermi Great Filter,” a potential resolution to the Fermi Paradox hypothesizing that intelligent life must face and overcome a series of challenges, including the Great Filter which only few evolved species are able to overcome. The statue shows a giant fork with two diverging paths, indicating the choices a civilization must make to survive: a fork in the road, a motive Musk has oft drawn on. 

Critiques of Musk’s philosophy

The high-stakes nature associated with Musk’s philosophy has drawn concern, with some arguing this effort to preserve humanity is actually threatening it. Rebecca Charbonneau, a historian at the American Institute of Physics, had a different interpretation of Musk’s philosophy as it pertained to work. In a piece published in Scientific American in February 2025, Charbonneau said Musk’s beliefs around preserving humanity reflected a bigger ideology in the world of tech. 

Roots in vestiges of Cold War anxieties (the same time period in which the Fermi Paradox emerged), tech leaders often saw a false binary of either limitless prosperity or complete societal collapse, Charbonneau argued. As a result, many in the field, including Musk, are willing to go to extreme measures in the name of avoiding what they perceive as humanity’s demise. 

“Proponents of this survivalist mindset see it as justifying particular programs of technological escalation at any cost, framing the future as a desperate race against catastrophe rather than a space for multiple thriving possibilities,” Charbonneau wrote.

She noted that Musk’s “Fork in the Road,” a strategy he employed both in culling staff at X and in the federal government as de facto leader of DOGE, was reflective of this. Musk called DOGE the “chainsaw of bureaucracy,” promising to shave $2 trillion in federal spending. Instead, the advisory eliminated about $150 billion in spending through headcount reductions and contract cancellations. Federal workers said the cuts made their jobs harder, eliminating valuable resources that resulted in their jobs taking longer, with the quality of the government’s work suffering.

Charbonneau argued Musk’s philosophy eliminates opportunities for nuance, making institutions—and humanity—vulnerable to often extreme responses to delicate situations.

“By framing humanity’s challenges as simple engineering problems rather than complex systemic ones, technologists position themselves as decisive architects of our future, crafting grand visions that sidestep the messier, necessary work of social, political and collaborative change,” she said.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Shooting in New South Wales leaves three dead

0

Three people have died and another injured after a shooting in a small town in New South Wales, Australia, police have said.

Emergency services were called to a residential area in Lake Cargelligo at about 16:40 local time (05:40 GMT).

The suspect is still on the run and is believed to have fled in a vehicle, NSW police confirmed.

A man and woman were found shot dead in a vehicle, a second shooting soon afterwards killed a woman and left a man in a “critical condition” in hospital, police said.

The Sydney Morning Herald reports that the incident was a suspected domestic violence attack.

Andrew Holland, NSW police assistant commissioner, declined to comment on the relationship between the gunman and the victims.

The public has been urged to remain indoors and multiple crime scenes have been established, he told reporters.

“Any death in a small country town is confronting, but again, a scene where you have people shot by firearms is obviously going to make people very, very tense and very concerned,” said Holland.

“The scene faced by the emergency services officers at that time would have been horrendous.”

Lake Cargelligo is located in the centre of New South Wales and has a population of about 1,500 people.

The incident comes after last month’s mass shooting at Sydney’s Bondi Beach which killed 15 people.